The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for May 06, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 59 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Baby bell mushroom from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 133 – The University of Texas at Austin, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Type One Energy Group Are Working on An Improved Process for Finding Holes in Magnetic Fields

    Nuclear Fusion 133 – The University of Texas at Austin, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Type One Energy Group Are Working on An Improved Process for Finding Holes in Magnetic Fields

    For decades, fusion energy has held the promise of a revolutionary power source that is clean, safe, and virtually limitless.

    Unlike fossil fuels or even traditional nuclear power, nuclear fusion mimics the energy production of the Sun. Atomic nuclei fuse together to release massive amounts of energy without greenhouse gas emissions or long-lived radioactive waste.

    However, one serious problem has kept this dream out of reach. That is the inability to reliably contain high-energy particles inside fusion reactors.

    These particles are essential to keeping the plasma hot enough for sustained fusion. However, they tend to escape through holes in the reactor’s magnetic field, draining energy and halting the reaction.

    Now, a team of researchers from The University of Texas at Austin, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Type One Energy Group have developed a faster, more accurate way to fix those magnetic flaws. This could accelerate the development of stellarators, one of the most promising fusion reactor designs, by a factor of ten.

    Fusion reactors require a superheated plasma confined within strong magnetic fields. An important issue has been the escape of high-energy alpha particles, which are supposed to help maintain the plasma’s heat and pressure. When these particles leak, they weaken the reaction which prevents the conditions necessary for sustained fusion.

    However, these magnetic fields often contain ‘holes’ through which alpha particles escape. Finding and correcting these flaws using traditional methods based on Newton’s laws is computationally intensive and slow. The design process becomes cumbersome as engineers need to simulate and test hundreds of variations in the configuration of the coils.

    To make the process more manageable, scientists have used a faster but far less accurate technique called perturbation theory, which often leads to serious errors.

    The new method, developed by the research team and detailed in their recent paper, uses symmetry theory to locate and eliminate magnetic holes while requiring just a tenth of the computational power.

    Josh Burby is an assistant professor of physics at UT and first author of the paper. He said, “What’s most exciting is that we’re solving something that’s been an open problem for almost 70 years. It’s a paradigm shift in how we design these reactors.”

    Although the method was designed for stellarators, its applications also extend to tokamaks which are the more widely studied cousin of stellarators.

    In tokamaks, the danger lies in runaway electrons, which can puncture the walls of the reactor if not properly contained. The new technique can help find the weak spots in magnetic fields, potentially improving reactor safety and durability.

    Burby said, “There is currently no practical way to find a theoretical answer to the alpha-particle confinement question without our results. Direct application of Newton’s laws is too expensive. Perturbation methods commit gross errors. Ours is the first theory that circumvents these pitfalls.”.

    This breakthrough not only solves a specific technical bottleneck but also provides an important tool for companies racing to commercialize fusion power.

    Type One Energy Group contributed to the research. It is working to construct next-generation stellarators for energy production.

    Type One Energy Group

  • Geiger Readings for May 05, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 95 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 60 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for May 04, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 118 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 75 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 77 nanosieverts per hour

    Yellow bell pepper from Central Market = 133 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 82 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 71 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for May 03, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 112 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 107 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    White onion from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 78 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 117 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 880 – Tensions Rise Between Pakistan and India Over Kashmir

    Nuclear Weapons 880 – Tensions Rise Between Pakistan and India Over Kashmir

    Javed Ashraf Qazi is the former Director General of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and Military Intelligence, and a former senator during the Musharraf administration. He voiced grave concern over the rapidly deteriorating relationship between India and Pakistan, especially in the aftermath of the deadly attack on Hindu pilgrims in Kashmir.

    Qazi warned that the ongoing increase of hostility between the two nuclear-armed neighbors risks triggering a catastrophic conflict. He stated, “India had been threatening Pakistan with unrest in Baluchistan. After a train was hijacked in Baluchistan, it was confirmed that Baluch insurgents had been funded and instigated by India.”.

    He further noted that Pakistan had long been dealing with cross-border terrorism, particularly through Afghanistan. “We have been constantly facing the Taliban terrorists hitting our civilian population.”. Qazi pointing to a pattern of sustained external aggression.

    He continued that the relations between the two countries had significantly worsened following India’s unilateral move to absorb Kashmir into its territory, in defiance of UN resolutions. He emphasized, “Kashmiris have been fighting India for the last twenty years. There have been killings on both sides. India blames Pakistan for supporting the Kashmiri population, which is a Muslim-majority state forcibly absorbed by India.”.

    Qazi pointed out that many small groups of Kashmiris continue to resist Indian forces, fighting them in forests and mountains. Referring to the April 22nd attack in Pahalgam, he said, “A small group of five or six Kashmiris attacked passengers of a bus carrying Hindu pilgrims to a shrine. Reportedly, 26 Hindu passengers and two Muslim drivers were killed.”. He said that within minutes of the incident in Kashmir, India had blamed Pakistan and vowed retaliation.

    He had serious concerns over India’s immediate military response, “Pakistan’s river water was threatened to be blocked despite an international treaty. Indian forces have taken an offensive posture. Their Air Force is flying round-the-clock over the border.”.

    Qazi lamented the lack of serious dialogue between the two sides. “Pakistan has asked for proof, even just one terrorist shown to the media — but India has shut the border crossings and ordered all Pakistanis in India to leave. They are preparing to attack and refusing to talk.”.

    Highlighting the nuclear dimension of the conflict, the former ISI chief warned, “Both countries are nuclear weapon states. A war could lead to nuclear devastation — not just of our two nations, but of the entire region. The nuclear cloud can spread beyond hundreds of miles. In Japan, only two bombs were dropped and the consequences are visible even today. India and Pakistan have more than 170 bombs each. It is horrible to imagine a war with such an arsenal.”.

    Qazi believes that India is using the current situation in Kashmir to assert itself as a regional hegemon. He also said that the global community cannot remain a bystander. “This incident of Pahalgam — 26 tourist killings — pales when compared to the ongoing Muslim killings in India over the past many years,” he said. “The UN Security Council must take immediate notice and defuse the situation before it leads to a nuclear winter. Time is running out.”.

    Kashmir