The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1485 – Texas Legislature Working on a New Agency to Support Deployment of Small Modular Reactors

    Nuclear Reactors 1485 – Texas Legislature Working on a New Agency to Support Deployment of Small Modular Reactors

    Nuclear power expansion is on the mind of the Texas Legislature, and now a priority bill has been filed in the lower chamber with the intention of jumpstarting the state’s small modular reactor (SMR) footprint.

    State Representative Cody Harris (R-Palestine) filed House Bill (HB) 14, the “Texas Advanced Nuclear Deployment Act,” which would create an agency within the Office of the Governor tasked with attracting advanced nuclear power projects and facilitating their movement through the approval process.

    It also details the disbursement of state funds for the reimbursement of certain costs incurred, such as for technology development, design and siting, permitting work, and construction work. The third tier of the funding is the drawn from the Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Fund, a per-megawatt financial award for those who build and operate a SMR. The proposal would also provide for a completion bonus similar to that associated with the Texas Energy Fund (TEF).

    Harris said, “The purpose of House Bill 14 is to make Texas the nuclear Capital of the world. The United States must win the nuclear renaissance. It is imperative that the United States become the leader in the development of advanced nuclear technology and the exporter of that technology to the developing world — not Russia or China. Stimulating the deployment of advanced nuclear reactors in Texas will not only bring needed safe, reliable energy to the State of Texas, but also make Texas a worldwide leader in nuclear development.”

    The nuclear industry believes that SMR technology has solved the economic problem that caused a decades-long stagnation of the nuclear power industry in America, making a return on investment easier to achieve both in cost and construction time.

    Many parties seem bullish on this shakeup of the nuclear game, so much so that Texas Governor Greg Abbott declared in his 2025 State of the State address that “It’s time for Texas to lead a nuclear power renaissance in the United States.”

    Abbott spokesman Andrew Mahaleris said, “Texas is the energy capital of the world, and we are ready to lead a nuclear power renaissance in the United States. By utilizing advanced nuclear energy, Texas will enhance the reliability of the state grid and provide affordable, dispatchable power to Texans across the state. Governor Abbott looks forward to reviewing any nuclear deployment bill that the legislature sends to his desk.”

    Reed Clay is the President of the Texas Nuclear Alliance. He said, “House Bill 14 would represent the biggest step taken by any state in the United States to deploy advanced nuclear reactors. The creation of the Texas Advanced Nuclear Energy Program will bring reliable, dispatchable power to Texas and ensure Texas’ place as the economic hub for the future of nuclear. The Texas Nuclear Alliance applauds Representative Harris, Speaker Burrows, and Gov. Abbott for their leadership on this issue and for recognizing the immense potential nuclear power has to keep Texas strong, prosperous and secure.”

    The blueprint differs from that which was filed by state Senator Tan Parker (R-Flower Mound) and state Representative Drew Darby (R-San Angelo), who chairs the Energy Resources Committee, that’s intended to achieve the same general objective.

    One difference is that under the Harris’ plan, the Public Utility Commission (PUC) is charged with depositing money from the TEF into the nuclear fund. Parker and Darby’s version does not include transfer of funds to the TEF.

    Given the low number of the bill, Harris’ legislation appears to be the preferred version in the lower chamber. And differences over details aside, both chambers are ready to pass something that creates a nuclear power regulatory authority.

    The program is scheduled to expire on September 1st, 2040.

    Texas Office of the Governor

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 10, 2025

    Ambient office = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 133 nanosieverts per hour

    White onion from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 65 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 09, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Mar 09, 2025

    Ambient office = 77 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 74 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 08, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Mar 08, 2025

    Ambient office = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Shallot from Central Market = 81 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 64 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 108 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 118 – University Of Kentucky Researchers Are Working On Developing New Alloys For The Walls Of Fusion Reactors

    Nuclear Fusion 118 – University Of Kentucky Researchers Are Working On Developing New Alloys For The Walls Of Fusion Reactors

         A team of scientists has just acquired a massive grant to create materials strong enough to withstand the blistering heat and radiation inside a fusion reactor, where temperatures soar beyond one hundred and eighty million degrees Fahrenheit.
         The U.S. Department of Energy’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) allocated two million three hundred thousand dollars to the University of Kentucky to lead the development of next-generation materials that could make commercial fusion power a reality.
         The project will tackle one of the biggest hurdles in the quest for limitless clean energy. It will be managed by Dr. John Balk, Director of the Materials Science Research Priority Area and W.T. Bryan Professor of Materials Engineering at the University of Kentucky’s Stanley and Karen Pigman College of Engineering.
         Balk said, “This is a great opportunity for the expertise of our team behind the Materials Science Research Priority Area to solve one of the key challenges in radiation-heavy industries: how to enhance thermal conductivity without sacrificing material strength.” His team aims to make fusion power commercially viable.
         To achieve this, their goal is to develop a class of first wall materials that form the inner wall of a fusion reactor and contact the plasma, which will maintain performance over the lifetime of a fusion power plant. They will explore promising alloy formulas and manufacturing processes to enhance the strength and resilience of this critical barrier.
         No existing materials can endure the extreme conditions required for commercial fusion power. The project will focus on developing advanced composites for high-radiation environments.
         Balk emphasized the challenge of working with tungsten (W) which is a metal with one of the highest melting points on Earth but is also prone to brittleness. By combining tungsten with other metals like chromium (Cr) or tantalum (Ta), he intends to create a high-melting alloy that is significantly more durable and better suited for fusion reactor conditions.
          Balk revealed that “We’re going to make materials that are based on porous tungsten-based alloys, but they’re optimized for the mechanical and thermal properties we want. We’re going to backfill them with a high-thermal-conductivity ceramic at small length scales so that the radiation damage can be shed more easily to the interfaces.”
         Balk added, “Materials research is critically important and underpins many other science and engineering efforts, and this project is a good example of that impact.”
         Dr. Beth Guiton is the Frank J. Derbyshire Professor of Materials Science and professor of chemistry at the College of Arts and Sciences. She emphasized the importance of the research and how the team intends to use machine learning to improve the material’s strength and radiation resistance.
         Guiton explained, “Keeping the plasma contained without accidentally stopping the fusion reaction or damaging your reactor materials is a challenge and a huge roadblock in this work. The temperatures involved are sufficient to vaporize the structure should they come into contact with it, yet we need to be able to extract the enormous amount of energy evolved so that it can be useful.”
         The chemistry expert said in a news release, “Balk’s work is important for Kentucky science; it’s important for fusion energy and for advancing U.S. energy technology. If a commercial fusion power plant is successfully created, you’ve solved cheap, clean, safe and abundant energy production.”
         Evelyn Wang is the ARPA-E Director. She said, “ARPA-E is a leader in supporting technologies that could make commercial fusion a reality on a much shorter timescale,” adding that the project is one of thirteen selected by the agency for nearly thirty million dollars in combined funding.
         Wang concluded, “CHADWICK expands our focus to making fusion power plants operationally and economically viable by developing a high performance and durable first wall.”

    University of Kentucky

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 07, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Mar 07, 2025

    Ambient office = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 93 nanosieverts per hour