Author: Burt Webb

  • Geiger Readings for Feb 01, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Feb 01, 2025

    Ambient office = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 137 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 136 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 100 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 109 – Artificial Intelligence And Nuclear Fusion – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 109 – Artificial Intelligence And Nuclear Fusion – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         AI can help narrow the range of candidate materials for testing, characterize them based on their properties, and carry out real-time monitoring of those installed in fusion reactors. These capabilities allow the rapid screening and development of radiation-tolerant materials, reducing reliance on current time-intensive approaches.
         AI also offers improved control of the plasma in fusion reactors. As discussed above, a key challenge in magnetic confinement fusion is to shape and maintain the high-temperature plasma within the fusion reactor.
         However, the plasmas in these fusion reactors are inherently unstable. A control system needs to coordinate the tokamak’s many magnets, and adjust their voltage thousands of times per second to prevent the plasma from touching the walls of the vessel. This could lead to the loss of heat and potentially damage the materials inside the fusion reactor.
         Researchers from the U.K.-based company Google DeepMind have utilized a form of AI called deep reinforcement learning to keep the plasma stable and to accurately sculpt it into different shapes. This allows researchers to understand how the plasma behaves under different conditions.
         A team at Princeton University in the U.S. has also used deep reinforcement learning to forecast disturbances in fusion plasma known as “tearing mode instabilities,” up to three hundred milliseconds before they occur. Tearing instabilities are a major form of disruption that can occur, halting the fusion process. They happen when the magnetic field lines within a plasma break and create an opportunity for that plasma to escape the control system in a fusion reactor.
         Work at the U.K. Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) is addressing critical challenges in materials performance and structural integrity by integrating a variety of techniques. These include machine learning models, for evaluating what’s known as the residual stress of materials. Residual stress is a way to measure performance that’s locked into materials during manufacturing or operation. It can seriously affect the reliability and safety of fusion reactor components under extreme conditions.
         A key outcome of this work is the development of a technique that integrates data from experiments with a machine learning-powered predictive model to evaluate residual stress in fusion components.
         This new technique has been validated through collaborations with leading institutions, including the National Physical Laboratory and UKAEA’s materials research facility. These developments provide efficient and accurate assessments of materials performance and have redefined the evaluation of residual stress. They have unlocked new possibilities for assessing the structural integrity of components used in fusion reactors.
         This research directly supports the European Demonstration Power Plant (EU-DEMO) and the Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) projects. These projects aim to deliver a demonstration fusion power plant and prototype fusion power plant, respectively, to scale. Their success depends on maintaining the structural integrity of critical components under extreme conditions.
         By using many AI-based approaches in a coordinated way, scientists can ensure that fusion reactors are physically robust and economically viable, accelerating the path to commercialization. AI can be used to develop accurate simulations of fusion reactors that integrate insights from plasma physics, materials science, engineering, and other aspects of the process. By simulating fusion systems within these virtual environments, scientists can optimize reactor design and operational strategies.

    Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 31, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 31, 2025

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 95 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 15 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 108 – Artificial Intelligence And Nuclear Fusion – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 108 – Artificial Intelligence And Nuclear Fusion – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         The pursuit of nuclear fusion as a clean, sustainable energy source is one of the most challenging scientific and engineering goals of our time. Commercial fusion power promises nearly limitless energy without carbon emissions or long-living radioactive waste.
         However, achieving practical fusion power requires solving significant challenges. These challenges come from the heat generated by the fusion process, the radiation produced, the progressive damage to materials used in fusion reactors, and other engineering problems. Fusion systems operate under extreme physical conditions, and they generate data at scales that surpass the ability of humans to analyze.
         Nuclear fusion is the process that powers our Sun and other stars. Existing commercial nuclear power relies on a process called fission, where a heavy chemical element nucleus is split to produce lighter ones. Nuclear fusion works by combining the nuclei of two light elements to make a heavier one.
         While physicists have been able to initiate and sustain fusion for short periods of time, getting more energy out of the process than the energy supplied to power the fusion device has been a serious challenge. So far, this has prevented the commercialization of this hugely promising energy source.
         Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a powerful and critical tool for managing the challenges of fusion research. It holds promise for dealing with the complex data and convoluted relationships between different aspects of the fusion process. This development not only enhances our understanding of fusion but also accelerates the development of new reactor designs.
         By addressing these challenges, AI offers the potential to significantly compress timelines for the development of fusion reactors. It will pave the way for the commercialization of nuclear fusion.
         AI is reshaping fusion research across academic, government, and commercial sectors which is driving innovation and progress toward a sustainable energy future. It can play a transformative role in addressing the challenges of developing materials for fusion reactors. These new materials must be able to withstand extreme thermal and neutron environments while maintaining structural integrity and functionality.
         By connecting datasets from different experiments, simulations, and manufacturing processes, AI models can generate predictions and insights that can be acted on. Machine learning is a form of AI that can significantly accelerate the evaluation and optimization of materials that could be used in fusion reactors.
         These include the doughnut-shaped fusion reactors called tokamaks used in magnetic confinement fusion (where magnetic coils are used to guide and control hot plasma, allowing fusion reactions to occur). The extremely hot plasma can damage the materials used in the interior walls of the tokamak, as well as irradiating them.
         Machine learning involves the use of algorithms (a set of mathematical rules) that can learn from experimental data and apply those lessons to unseen problems. Insights from this form of AI are extremely critical for guiding the selection and validation of materials able to endure the harsh conditions inside fusion reactors. AI has allowed scientists to develop detailed simulations that permit the rapid evaluation of materials performance and their configurations within a fusion reactor. This approach helps ensure long-term reliability and cost efficiency.
    Fusion Reaction
    Please read Part 2 next
     

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 30, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 30, 2025

    Ambient office = 58 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Purple onion from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1472 – Australian Political Parties Disagree About The Need For Nuclear Power – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1472 – Australian Political Parties Disagree About The Need For Nuclear Power – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Other Australians at COP29 say it is important not to overstate nuclear’s presence, and its place in the global net-zero carbon effort.
         Tennant Reed is the Director of Climate Change and Energy at the Ai Group, and he is a veteran of COP climate summits. He said the arrival of nuclear energy in the climate change scene had certainly been noticeable.
         Reed added, “When I was at the 2018 climate summit in Poland, there was something of a fuss and surprise when a person in a giant inflatable polar bear costume burst into the cafeteria, accompanied by pro-nuclear youth and an opera singer singing pro-nuclear songs. That was very unusual but there’s a lot more visibility for the nuclear power industry, and nuclear advocates, in the trade show element of these conferences these days.” He continued that growth in nuclear power wasn’t a feature of the main negotiations at Baku, but neither was scaling up any other particular energy source.”
         Reed went on to say that nuclear advocates were hosting events on the sidelines, and they were very sensitive to one criticism in particular. He said, “They’re all conscious that they have to show that they can deliver new projects ‘on time and on budget’. I must have heard that phrase fifty times from nuclear people.”
         Reed added, “I think that they’re conscious that this is an ambition that the last wave of nuclear development in Western countries certainly did not meet. But they are very focused on making sure that this time is different.”
         The IAEA is forecasting a few big decades for nuclear power, expecting global production to more than double by 2050. However, Reed said much of the growth in nuclear power was coming from countries with established industries. While other countries were expressing interest in setting up an industry, few had recently broken ground. He said there was a much more momentum in the roll-out of renewables. He added that “Wind and solar deployment, and especially solar at the moment, is taking off like a rocket. It took the world a very long time to deploy its first total terawatt of solar energy production. We are now doubling every couple of years. And so there’s a vast amount of on-the-ground deployment of wind and solar that is happening.”
         Some conservation groups have tried to push back on the rising prominence of nuclear power, seeing it as a threatening distraction in efforts to combat climate change. The Australian Conservation Foundation’s (ACF) Dave Sweeney attended the COP29 conference in Baku. He cast some doubt on nuclear’s future, at least compared to renewables. Sweeney said, “It’s one thing to have agreements and aspirations, it’s another to have projects and power. The industry is having some very good rhetoric, but it’s having a very poor reality. We’ve seen thirty countries say that they will triple nuclear (power) by 2050; we’ve seen one hundred and twenty-five say that they will triple renewables by 2045.”
         Sweeney argues that part of the nuclear industry’s ambition is attracting public funding, in an effort to “de-risk” its projects. He added, “At meeting after meeting, they’ve spoken about the need for market reforms to de-risk nuclear projects. I think that is very bold code for ‘no-one wants to fund us, so we’re looking for the public purse’.”

    Australian Conservation Foundation

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 29, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 29, 2025

    Ambient office = 57 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Roma tomato from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour