Author: Burt Webb

  • Geiger Readings for Feb 08, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Feb 08, 2025

    Ambient office = 08 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Yellow bell pepper from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 110 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1474 – EDF Is Managing The U.K. Fleet of Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1474 – EDF Is Managing The U.K. Fleet of Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         EDF said its goal is to help restore U.K. nuclear output back above sixty terawatts per annum by replacing the existing AGR fleet capacity through the installation of new EPRs at Hinkley Point C and Sizewell C and extending Sizewell B out to 2055.
         EDF added, “Beyond this major commitment, we will continue to support government and industry with any plans to deliver a fleet of small modular reactors (SMRs), further large-scale nuclear at Wylfa and elsewhere and investment in advanced technologies. In line with the U.K. government strategy, EDF has continued to explore options for the long-term future of our sites. We are open in terms of which designs are taken forward at our sites and look forward to the government’s revised nuclear roadmap and further direction on which technologies should be developed on which sites as part of a holistic UK new build program.”
         At the same time as EDF Energy released its annual nuclear fleet update, a new report was published by independent consultants Economic Insight highlighting the significant contribution that nuclear energy has made to economic growth in the U.K. over the last fifty years.
         The new report was commissioned by EDF. It shows that the current fleet of eight nuclear power plants have so far contributed more than one hundred fifty-three billion dollars to the U.K. economy since the two oldest plants started operating in 1976.
         The report said that the fleet supported thirty thousand jobs each year when all eight plants were generating. Five thousand of those jobs have been directly with EDF. The majority of the jobs came through supply chain and other induced impacts, like hospitality businesses supported by local wages. That means that there was an average of five point three additional jobs in the U.K. economy for every EDF job.
        The positive impact on the U.K. supply chain is also highlighted with a finding that more than ninety percent of supply chain spending is made domestically, with around fifteen hundred U.K.-based companies.
         The report also employed a new methodology for calculating the carbon the nuclear plants have prevented from entering the atmosphere. Instead of comparing the nuclear output with gas generation alone, the report examines the historical energy mix, when coal was the prevailing fuel. This reveals that the two thousand one hundred and twenty-six terawatts of electricity the nuclear fleet has generated has prevented the emission of one billion tons of carbon, the equivalent to sixty years of U.K. car emissions.
         Mark Hartley is the Managing Director of EDF’s Nuclear Operations business. He said, “Nuclear power stations do not just produce zero-carbon electricity, they have supported tens of thousands of livelihoods for decades. This is the first time the economic impact of the operating phase of the fleet has been analyzed in this way. Seeing how the combined value of the power, jobs and supply chain spend adds up over time really helps to throw into sharp relief the positive impact that these facilities have on economic growth. The investment made in these stations over nearly fifty years has paid dividends, and will continue to do so, not just for the people working and living close to the stations but also the millions who benefit from the zero-carbon electricity they produce.”
    Électricité de France

  • Geiger Readings for Feb 07, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Feb 07, 2025

    Ambient office = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    White onion from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1473 – EDF Is Managing The U.K. Fleet of Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1473 – EDF Is Managing The U.K. Fleet of Commercial Nuclear Power Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         EDF Energy said the performance of its U.K. nuclear power plants in 2024 was “very good”, with an output of thirty-seven terawatts. It intends to maintain the same level over the coming years. Meanwhile, a new report has highlighted the contribution that nuclear energy has made to economic growth in the UK.
         EDF manages eight U.K. nuclear power plant sites. Five of them are currently operating (Sizewell B, Torness, Heysham 2, Heysham 1 and Hartlepool) and three have entered decommissioning (Hunterston B, Hinkley Point B and Dungeness B). It took over the nuclear power plants sites when it acquired British Energy in 2009. The company is also constructing the new Hinkley Point C plant in Somerset as well as advanced plans for a replica of Hinkley Point C at Sizewell C in Suffolk.
         EDF Energy said, “U.K. nuclear output in 2024 totaled thirty-seven terawatts – the same as 2023 – and nearly four times more than was anticipated for 2024 at the point of acquisition in 2009. The U.K. imported twenty-one terawatts from France in 2024, the majority of which will have been generated by French nuclear reactors. The objective is to sustain output at around this level into 2027 and longer, if possible.”
         EDF noted it has invested about ten billion dollars in the U.K. fleet since it acquired it in 2009 and will invest a further one billion sixty-two million dollars over the next three years (2025-27) “to help sustain current levels of generation, boost energy security and cut carbon.”
         EDF continued, “While output has dropped from a high point in 2016 of sixty-five terawatts from eight power stations, the fleet still plays an integral part in supporting U.K. energy security. This is especially true when demand is high and renewables output is low due to weather conditions.”
         EDF Energy said it has set itself a number of priorities over the next ten years.
         EDF said that the Sizewell B pressurized water reactor in Suffolk, which started operations in 1995, provides three percent of the U.K.’s electricity demand, “making it important for energy security and the UK’s clean power goals”. EDF said it will invest to enable a potential twenty-year operating extension, taking the lifetime from 2035 to 2055. “This decision is subject to agreeing the appropriate commercial model to ensure such an extension is viable.”
         Last December, further short life extensions for the four generating Advanced Gas Cooled Reactor (AGR) plants were announced. Heysham 1 and Hartlepool will generate until 2027, and Heysham 2 and Torness would have their lifetimes extended by two years to 2030. EDF said it wants to generate beyond these dates, subject to plant inspections and regulatory oversight.
         An agreement to remove the fuel from all seven AGR plants was reached in June 2021. Once the spent nuclear fuel has been removed, each plant will be transferred to Nuclear Restoration Services (NRS), part of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA). There are three nuclear power plants currently in defueling (Hunterston B, Hinkley Point B and Dungeness B). EDF said its target is to make this transfer approximately nine to twelve months after each power plant is declared as ‘fuel free’. The first plant due to transfer will be Hunterston B in mid-2026. The  rest of the nuclear fleet is due to transfer on a rolling basis in the years that follow. This is dependent on actual end of generation dates and overall defueling performance at each station and at Sellafield.
    Nuclear Restoration Services
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Feb 06, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Feb 06, 2025

    Ambient office = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 155 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 157 nanosieverts per hour

    Garlic bulb from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 943 – Legacy Radioactive Contamination In Colorado – Part 3 of 3 Parts

    Radioactive Waste 943 – Legacy Radioactive Contamination In Colorado – Part 3 of 3 Parts

    Part 3 of 3 Parts (Please read Parts 1 and 2 first)
         Edwin Lyman is the director of nuclear power safety at the Union of Concerned Scientists in Washington, D.C. He has a list of serious concerns about current storage methods. Lyman said, “If there’s no long-term plan to transfer that spent fuel to a more durable structure that can last for geologic time, then we can have a problem. real challenge of nuclear waste disposal is finding a way to make sure that it doesn’t affect the environment over this very long time period, that it’ll remain toxic.” Lyman has also said that the nation’s track record in storing spent nuclear fuel is not perfect.
         In 2018, workers moving a canister of spent nuclear fuel in California made an error and almost dropped the canister eighteen feet onto the floor of a concrete bunker. Lyman called this accident a near miss. According to government reports, the risks will only increase if more spent nuclear fuel has to be moved. Lyman also has other concerns like transportation accidents, sabotage and terrorism. He said, “A deliberate attack is certainly one way where you could maximize the potential harm to the community from that facility.”
         Lyman said that any community that considers building a temporary storage facility for the spent nuclear fuel needs to understand they would be accepting this waste without a long-term storage plan in place. He continued, “Because right now, there’s no plausible indication that it’s going to be going anywhere else. So they know they need to consider the fact that their community will ultimately be tagged as that permanent nuclear waste repository.”
         After Jeri Fry tuned into some of the nuclear waste discussions taking place in Northwest Colorado on YouTube last fall, she said she was saddened. A newspaper clipping detailing Jeri Fry’s father’s battle to win a workers’ compensation claim over his cancer that was linked to radiation exposure at the Cotter mill near Canon City hangs in Fry’s home.
         “Because it’s the same old game, and it’s very opportunistic,” Fry said about the federal government’s efforts to manage spent nuclear fuel. She is concerned that a community might raise its hand for a storage facility without being given a complete picture of the risks and should be asking a lot of questions. “If, as a community, we’re going to have to host this, ‘How long is that going on?.’” The containers that this (spent fuel) is in, are the containers going to last the life of the contents?”
         Opportunities for the public to ask questions will likely come soon. Public meetings on the spent nuclear fuel storage idea are being planned in Northwest Colorado. The DoE plans to formally ask which communities around the U.S. are interested in the idea, this fall.
         There are many concerns about the expansion of the U.S. nuclear power fleet. One of the biggest is how to deal with dangerous spent nuclear fuel generated during operation of commercial nuclear power plants. Without a permanent geological storage facility for the U.S., the spent nuclear fuel in temporary storage will only increase and continue to threaten public health and the environment.
    Union of Concerned Scientists