The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1344 – The European Commission Supports The Development and Deployment of Small Modular Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1344 – The European Commission Supports The Development and Deployment of Small Modular Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         The European Commission has launched an Industrial Alliance dedicated to small modular reactors (SMRs). They are aiming to facilitate the development of SMRs in Europe by the early 2030s. The announcement came as part of the commission’s assessment for a 2040 climate target for the EU.
        The European Commission established a European SMR pre-Partnership in June last year with the primary objective of identifying enabling conditions and constraints, including financial ones, towards safe design, construction and operation of SMRs in Europe in the next decade and beyond. The pre-Partnership will be in compliance with the EU legislative framework in general and to the Euratom legislative framework in particular.
         Early last November, it announced that it would create an Industrial Alliance for SMRs early this year. Industrial alliances are a way in which to facilitate stronger cooperation and joint action between all interested partners. Industrial alliances can play a role in achieving important EU policy objectives through joint action by all the interested partners.
        The commission said in a statement on 6 February, “The commission is also launching an Industrial Alliance to facilitate stakeholder’s cooperation at EU level and to accelerate the deployment of SMRs and ensure a strong EU supply chain, including a skilled workforce. This will leverage EU’s manufacturing and innovation capacities to accelerate the deployment of first SMR projects in the EU by early 2030 under the highest standards of nuclear safety, environmental sustainability, and industrial competitiveness.”
         According to the commission, this Industrial Alliance will develop a Strategic Action Plan in order to identify the following. Technically mature and commercially viable SMR technologies that could be supported under the alliance must be selected. Potential gaps and solutions in the European supply chain for SMRs (including fuel and raw materials) must be identified. Investment barriers, funding opportunities and new financial blending options to support SMR development must be found. Finally, future needs for research on SMRs and advanced modular reactors (AMRs) must be identified and existing skills gaps along the supply chain must be addressed under the Euratom Research and Training Program, and at national level.
         A call for organizations interested in alliance membership will open shortly. All public and private legal entities which satisfy a set of eligibility membership criteria can apply for membership. In addition, next month, a dissemination event covering the scope, objectives and activities of the Industrial Alliance is expected to be organized in Brussels.
        The European nuclear trade body Nucleareurope has been instrumental in the creation of the SMR Alliance. It said, “Thanks to the work undertaken as Chair of the European SMR pre-Partnership Steering Committee and our outreach to Members of the European Parliament that culminated in the overwhelming adoption of an Own Initiative Report on SMRs.”
         Yves Desbazeille is the Nucleareurope Director General. He said, “The deployment of SMRs will bring significant benefits to Europe, including greater energy sovereignty, lower CO2 emissions, new jobs and economic growth. The European nuclear industry has been at the forefront of innovation and industrial excellence for decades and this Industrial Alliance will help maintain our industry’s world class position”.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for February 12, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 12, 2024

    Ambient office = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 123 nanosieverts per hour

    Green onion from Central Market = 75 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for February 11, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 11, 2024

    Ambient office = 116 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for February 10, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 10, 2024

    Ambient office = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 78 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 105 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 851- Australian National University Improves Accuracy of Nuclear Test Detection To Ninety Nine Percent

    Nuclear Weapons 851- Australian National University Improves Accuracy of Nuclear Test Detection To Ninety Nine Percent

         A groundbreaking achievement has emerged in the realm of earth sciences and statistical analysis. The detection of underground nuclear tests has been raised to unparalleled levels of precision and is boasting an astounding ninety nine percent accuracy. This remarkable advancement was led by a team of researchers from the Australian National University (ANU). It stands as a monumental stride towards curtailing clandestine nuclear activities on a global scale.
         The conventional methods utilized to detect underground nuclear explosions have long grappled with the problem of distinguishing them amidst the myriad of seismic phenomena, ranging from natural earthquakes to surface-level disturbances. Mark Hoggard is the lead author of this pioneering research effort in which the challenges of identifying underground nuclear tests are elucidated.
         Hoggard says that “The explosion goes off, and you have all this energy that radiates out, which we can measure on seismometers. So, the science problem becomes, how do we tell the difference between that and a naturally occurring earthquake?”
         The impetus for this important breakthrough stems from the serious inadequacies witnessed during the identification of North Korea’s underground nuclear tests, particularly underscored during the events of 2017.
         Despite mounting suspicions, the prevailing methodologies failed to conclusively confirm these events. However, through the application of refined mathematical models and sophisticated statistical analyses, the research team has achieved an extraordinary improvement in success rates, elevating them from a previous eighty two percent to an extraordinary ninety nine percent.
    View on Watch
        North Korea remains the only nation known to have conducted underground nuclear tests in the 21st century. However, recent satellite reconnaissance has unveiled renewed construction activities at nuclear test sites in major global powers such as Russia, the U.S., and China. There are no overt indications of impending tests from these formidable nations. However, geopolitical uncertainties, compounded by events such as the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, underscore the critical need for robust and foolproof detection mechanisms.
         The newfound ability to detect underground nuclear tests with an unprecedented 99% accuracy represents a watershed moment in fortifying global security architecture and buttressing non-proliferation endeavors.
         As nations navigate the complex web of evolving geopolitical dynamics, this breakthrough is critical for monitoring and deterring covert nuclear activities. Armed with carefully compiled seismic data and refined statistical methodologies, the global community is now better equipped to turn back the tide of nuclear proliferation and safeguard global peace and stability.
        This historic achievement serves as a testament to the collective prowess of collaborative scientific endeavors. It also reveals the pivotal role of innovation in addressing the most pressing global challenges. As the scientific community celebrates this important milestone, the trajectory towards a safer and more secure world is charted. It is fueled by the twin engines of innovation and international cooperation.
         In a world filled with uncertainties and existential threats, the significance of this breakthrough cannot be overemphasized. It underscores the resilience and ingenuity of the human spirit. It also highlights the indispensable imperative of investing in cutting-edge scientific research for the betterment of humanity.
         As the leaders of progress and enlightenment, the global scientific community marches toward a future of peace, security, and shared prosperity. As the world navigates through complex geopolitical landscapes, the assurance of enhanced detection capabilities for nuclear testing offers hope for a safer and more secure future.

  • Geiger Readings for February 09, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 09, 2024

    Ambient office = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 151 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 146 nanosieverts per hour

    Asparagus from Central Market = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour