The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for April 07, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 07, 2024

    Ambient office = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Mini cucumber from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for April 06, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 06, 2024

    Ambient office = 78 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 118 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Green onion from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 51 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 106 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1366 – Argonne National Laboratory Is Working On Alternative Cooling Schemes For The Columbia Generating Station

    Nuclear Reactors 1366 – Argonne National Laboratory Is Working On Alternative Cooling Schemes For The Columbia Generating Station

         The current fleet of commercial nuclear power reactors across the U.S. is cooled by water from a variety of sources. Rivers, lakes, and oceans are fed through systems that extract and dissipate heat from the reactor cores. However, the recent effects of climate change have been raising the temperature of bodies of water to the point where they cannot be used to cool reactors.
        Climate scientists and nuclear science and engineering experts at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DoE) Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) are collaborating to develop a plan B for nuclear power in Richland, Washington.
         Scientists at the ANL will use Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) funding from DoE to work with Washington’s Energy Northwest (EN) to guide the design and selection of future nuclear reactor cooling systems and their impacts on the cost of electricity in Washington state.
         Rick Vilim is the manager of the Plant Analysis and Control and Sensors department in Argonne’s Nuclear Science and Engineering division. He is leading the research project with the assistance of Rao Kotamarthi, senior scientist in Argonne’s Environmental Science division.
         According to Vilim, the most economical and best way to cool a reactor is to use a local, flowing waterway. These would include such sources of water as a lake or a river, for what is called “wet” cooling. Wet cooling makes it possible to easily conduct heat away from a reactor and its cooling rods. That is the current cooling design employed at Washington’s nuclear power plant, the Columbia Generating Station (CGS) in Richland, which produces nearly zero greenhouse gas emissions and eight percent of the state’s electricity. It relies on a steady flow of cold water from the Columbia River to keep its temperature down.
         However, when considering construction of future nuclear power plants, EN thought it wise to develop a contingency plan in case the river conditions change. Despite the well-established wet climate of its most populous city, Seattle, Washington state is quite temperate and dry east of the Cascade Mountain Range. If evolving climate models indicate that warmer, drier days lie ahead, more aridity will obviously affect the volume, flow, and temperature of the Columbia River.
        Vilima explains that there is an alternate dry cooling design which uses ambient air circulated across a reactor’s heat exchangers to conduct heat away from a reactor core. This would replace the reliance on a river or lake, or using fans or physics similar to those in a house chimney or car radiator.
         Vilim said, “Dry cooling is not quite as efficient or as economical as wet cooling. However, if wet cooling isn’t available, it is your best option.”
         Kotamarthi and his team are able perform impact analyses of risks from a changing climate, such as drought, heat waves and wildfire. The researchers can also provide translation of what that data means for local, immediate decisions. In addition, they can recalculate the data to demonstrate the effect 25 or 50 years from now. High performance computing resources at ANL give Kotamarthi and his group the capability to develop very high-resolution regional scale climate model projections. The current model resolution is about seven and a half miles. However, newer models in development are expected to get as specific as a two-and-a-half-mile area.

  • Geiger Readings for April 05, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 05, 2024

    Ambient office = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Garlic from Central Market = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 56 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 68 – Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Is Working On A New Design For A Stellarator

    Nuclear Fusion 68 – Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Is Working On A New Design For A Stellarator

         A team of scientists has achieved a major breakthrough in fusion energy technology. They have built a first-of-its-kind fusion experiment using permanent magnets. This is a surprisingly simple technique that could potentially dramatically reduce the cost of future fusion power plants.
         The team is based at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL). They have pioneered a new design for a type of fusion machine called a stellarator.
         Stellarators use complex magnetic fields to confine plasma which is the superheated state of matter needed to fuel the fusion reactions that power the Sun and stars. If it is possible to harness on Earth, fusion could offer an abundant source of clean energy.
         Stellarators and tokamaks are both devices designed to use magnetic fields to contain the incredibly hot plasma needed for nuclear fusion.
         The key difference between the two types of fusion reactors lies in how they create the magnetic field that keeps the plasma in place. Tokamaks utilize a powerful electric current flowing through the plasma itself, along with external coils. Stellarators rely solely on complex, twisted magnetic coils to shape the field. This makes stellarators inherently more stable than tokamaks. This means that they are suitable for continuous operation. However, tokamaks are currently better at maintaining high temperatures in the plasm. Scientists hope to use stellarators as power plants in the future if they can replicate the fusion process that occurs within stars like our Sun.
         Existing stellarators create their complex magnetic fields with precisely constructed and expensive electromagnets. However, the PPPL team’s innovative device, called MUSE, employs a different approach. Instead of electromagnets, the PPPL stellarators rely on permanent magnets. These magnets the same kind that adorn refrigerators. This approach drastically simplifies construction.
         Graduate student Tony Qian, whose research was key to MUSE’s development, said, “Using permanent magnets is a completely new way to design stellarators. This technique allows us to test new plasma confinement ideas quickly and build new prototypes easily,”
         MUSE’s clever design isn’t just about how much it costs. Scientists theorized that permanent magnets could be used in this way. However, it took decades for someone to pull it off. Michael Zarnstorff is a senior research physicist at PPPL. He first realized the potential in 2014. “I realized…permanent magnets could generate and maintain the magnetic fields necessary to confine the plasma so fusion reactions can occur,” he reveals.
         Stellarators hold a significant advantage over a popular alternative fusion machine design known as a tokamak. Tokamaks also use magnetic fields. However, they rely on electric currents flowing within the plasma itself. Those currents can be unstable which makes fusion reactions harder to sustain. Stellarators don’t have this issue and this allows them to run continuously.
         The problem is that the magnets currently used in stellarators’ have been notoriously difficult to design and manufacture. This engineering challenge has relegated the stellarator design to an underdog position despite its potential edge. MUSE could change the game entirely with its readily available, easily shaped magnets.
         MUSE’s design embodies a crucial property called quasi-symmetry. This means that even though the stellarator’s shape might look irregular, the strength of its magnetic field is very consistent throughout. This uniformity helps keep the plasma neatly contained. This, in turn, makes fusion more likely. MUSE is designed to be superbly quasi-symmetrical. This makes it far more stable than earlier stellarator models.

         The PPPL team is now preparing for experiments to study MUSE’s quasi-symmetry. They are hoping it will provide crucial insight into how well it will actually perform. Ultimately, MUSE’s success offers a glimpse into a future where fusion power plants are more affordable and accessible. Permanent magnets will play a starring role in this clean energy revolution.

  • Geiger Readings for April 04, 2024

    Geiger Readings for April 04, 2024

    Ambient office = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 133 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 59 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 60 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 51 nanosieverts per hour