The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Part Four of Four Parts (Please read Parts One, Two and Three first)
12) Too much or too little water: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has been criticizing the flood prevention measures of twenty old U.S. power reactors similar to the ones that melted down at Fukushima. Each reactor is downstream from a dam. If there was a break or major leak in the upstream dam, the reactor would be in danger of flooding. There is a major sink hole forming under one of the dams that has authorities worried.
Some major rivers in the U.S. and other parts of the world are no longer flowing into the ocean. Human use has drained all the water out before the rivers reach the coast. Levels of major lakes and reservoirs such as Lake Mead are dropping to historical low levels. It takes enormous amounts of water to cool a nuclear power reactor. Some power reactors may have to be shutdown if their source of water drops too low. The shut downs will be permanent if the water level is not restored.
13) Regulatory agencies are not competent or honest. Some of the national nuclear regulatory agencies in nuclear nations have an impossible task of simultaneously regulating and promoting nuclear energy generation. There have been charges that the U.S. NRC has been failing to enforce regulations on the operators of U.S. nuclear power reactors. In one case, the agency was accused of changing the rules with respect to earthquake reinforcement so that a nuclear power plant would qualify as being prepared. If there is a quake similar to previous quakes in that area, that plant may be seriously damaged.
14) Corporations are incompetent or deliberately negligent: There are many examples of the owners of nuclear power reactors failing to follow national nuclear regulation. There are cases of lack of training of staff, shoddy construction methods, failing to report or openly lying about problems, failure to replace worn parts, purchase of uncertified parts, etc. It has been established that TEPCO, the owners of the Fukushima power plant that had reactors melt down in 2011 were aware of the dangers of a tsunami causing flooding three years before the disaster but they did not report the danger until the week of the disaster. They ignored calls from the Japanese regulators to move a backup generator that was destroyed in the disaster. Since the disaster they have repeatedly failed to deal with contaminated water on the site and have lied about the release of radiation from the accident. Corporation that own and operate nuclear power reactors are a public threat when they place profits before safety.
15) Organized crime is involved in nuclear industry. In Japan, the Yakuza crime organizations have been deeply involved in the construction and operation of nuclear power plants. They have provided much of the staffing for Japanese power plants even though some of the staffing they have provided is inadequately trained. In Italy, the Mafia controls much of the garbage and waste disposal for large areas and their work has included illegally disposing of spent nuclear fuel from European nuclear power plants. The involvement of organized crime in the operation of nuclear power plants and spent nuclear fuel disposal is totally uncontrolled and a threat to public safety.
Japanese government officials say that Fukushima should be declared uninhabitable. enenews.com
Germany’s tax on nuclear fuel conforms to European Union laws, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled yesterday. world-nuclear-news.org
The French government said Wednesday that it would support a rescue of struggling nuclear power giant Areva that would include a merger between its nuclear reactor business with Eletricite de France, the utility that is Areva’s largest customer. nuclearstreet.com
Part Three of Four Parts (Please read Parts One and Two first)
8) A lot of nuclear waste has been casually dumped with no thought to safety around the world. At the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington State, millions of gallons of liquid nuclear waste from nuclear weapons manufacture was just poured into trenches dug in the dirt. Temporary underground storage tanks full of toxic chemicals and liquid nuclear waste are leaking into the ground. Drums of nuclear waste were just tossed into the English Channel. The Russians sank submarines with nuclear fuel and nuclear reactors from vessels into the sea near Murmansk off the northern coast of Russia. The Russians recently informed the Norwegians that Norwegian fishing grounds might be at risk.
9) There has been a lot of illegal dumping of nuclear waste around the world. In addition to the casual dumping on nuclear waste during the nuclear age, there has also been outright illegal dumping of nuclear waste. A Mafia informant told Italian authorities that a central Italian Mafia took a ship loaded with spent fuel from European reactors and deliberately sank it off the coast of Italy. They have also been dumping off the coast of Somalia. Nuclear waste from France and Germany was illegally smuggled to northern European ports for transport and illegal dumping in Russia. Illegal dumping of nuclear waste continues today.
10) Uranium mining devastates the environment. The process of mining uranium is terribly polluting. Acid is poured over piles of uranium ore to dissolve out the uranium and the acid often leaks out of the containment system. In the area of Spokane, Washington, decades of uranium mining have left toxic chemicals and radioactive isotopes in the groundwater, surface water and soil, threatening the health of the people who live there. In Canada, Australia and other locations around the globe, uranium mines have also ruined the environment. In Niger in Africa, dust from the local uranium mine blows through local villages and piles up in drifts. New uranium mines are being opened around the world which will severely impact the local environments.
11) The fund for a geological repository for spent nuclear fuel is threatened in the U.S. The U.S. government started collecting funds for a permanent disposal site for U.S. spent nuclear fuel from the nuclear industry decades ago. The site was suppose to open in 1999 but that did not happen. The U.S. was working on a site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada but that project was cancelled in 2009. There was around thirty billion dollars in the fund when the project was stopped. The best estimate now is that the earliest that the U.S. could possibly open such a facility would in 2050. Owners of nuclear power plants that have been paying into the fund have begun to take some of the money back from the fund through court proceedings. If the fund is depleted and the U.S. is unable to replenish it, there may be a lack of funds for the creation of a permanent spent fuel disposal facility in the U.S. by 2050. This will leave spent nuclear fuel in deteriorating temporary dry casks at U.S. nuclear power plants.
(See Part Four)
Ranger open pit uranium mine in Australia: