Tokyo has been hit by the worst earthquake since 3/11. enenews.com

The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Japanese drones come back with footage of Fukushima destructions three years after the earthquake. voiceofrussia.com
I have blogged before about small modular reactors (SMR). There are different definitions of SMRs but for the purpose of this post, they generate under five hundred megawatts. The intent is to mass produce them in factories and then transport them to sites where they will be used. SMRs are still being designed, with investors and customers being sought. The U.S. Department of Energy is sinking about five hundred million dollars into research in cooperation with commercial firms.
Babcock & Wilcox had an arrangement with DoE where each would put one hundred fifty million each year to support the development of their mPower SMR. A year after the deal was signed, B&W has announced that it is scaling back its investment to fifteen million a year because they have been unable to find investors and customers. Investors are just not eager to put billions of dollars into SMR development which could take a decade or more. B&W is one of two companies working on SMRs with the DoE.
An SMR company called NuScale has had a rough time over the past few years with the SEC investigating some of the principle investors and shutting down the plant. New investors have been found and NuScale is back in business. In 2013, NuScale was selected as the second SMR company to receive DoE funds to support SMR development.
Westinghouse was also working on a SMR development project but they recently scaled back funding for the project when they lost out to B&W and NuScale for support from the DoE. Westinghouse has joined other companies in a consortium to license and build the Westinghouse SMR design for startup in 2022. Delays in the licensing will push the project back several years.
While prospects for SMRs are dimming in the United States, China is moving forward with small thorium nuclear reactor development. While the press in China is generally enthusiastic about this development, there have been articles that point out problems such as intense pressure to succeed quickly, intractable design issues, technical problems with handling molten salts in the reactor, extremely high operating temperatures, and engineering difficulties India is also very interested in developing thorium reactors. The thorium reactors is favored by Australian proponents of SMRs.
In March of this year, the Australian Department of Industry submitted materials for inclusion in an official government White Paper on energy. The DoI is advocating the development of small modular reactors to provide electricity to remote area of Australia. The Grattan Institute has proposed a line of SMRs along Australia’s East Coast, connected to the national power grid.
There is current interest in placing SMRs on barges or vessels that can be towed to where the energy is needed. This could provide power for remote communities as well as oil exploration and drilling. The Russians are building a floating nuclear power station which is slated to be anchored in a harbor. MIT recently put forward a design for a nuclear power station on floating platform located six miles out to sea.
The cost of construction per kilowatt for SMRs are expected to be about the same as for the construction of a full sized conventional nuclear reactor. The electricity generated will cost about the same as convention nuclear power generation. The primary attraction is the convenience and uniformity of factory production and the ability to transport the finished reactors to remote locations. All in all, the global future of the development and operation of small modular reactors is highly uncertain.
Diagram of the NuScale Small Modular Reactor;
Japanese officials admit it may be impossible to stop leaking at Fukushima reactors. enenews.com
Locals feel that the damaged Fukushima plant could explode at any minute. enenews.com
The island of Taiwan currently has three nuclear power plants with a total of six reactors that generate about almost five gigawatts. The nuclear power plants provide about twenty percent of the electricity for Taiwan. The existing nuclear power plants are scheduled to be decommissioned between 2018 and 2025. The biggest semiconductor plants in the world are located in Taiwan. About half of the electricity on the island are used by the electronics and petrochemical industries.
In 2000, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) which controlled the government at the time made the announcement that the construction of a fourth plant would be abandoned. The political situation in Taiwan became turbulent and the Taiwan stock market plunged for months following the announcement. Eventually the Taiwan Supreme Court overturned the DPP decision. Construction then continued on the fourth power plant. The nuclear plant has two reactors. One of the reactors is ninety eight percent complete.
The Premier of Taiwan has just announced that the construction of the fourth nuclear power station will be suspended until a public referendum has been held on whether or not the work should be completed. The protest of twenty eight thousand Taiwanese in Taipei streets forced the Kuomintang party to give in to a demand for halting the work on the nuclear plant which had almost been completed. The Premier’s announcement resulted in a breakup of the big demonstration but some protestor remained and clashed with the police. The police, claiming that they were attacked by protestors, chased the protestors. Over forty people sustained minimal injuries during the melee. Some sit-in protestors were carried away by the police.
Critics complain that all existing and future nuclear plants in Taiwan are or would be at risk from earthquakes which are a regular occurrence in Taiwan. There was a 7.6 magnitude quake in Taiwan that killed two thousand four hundred people. The destruction of the Fukushima nuclear power plant in Japan in March of 2011 has increased the rejection of nuclear power in Taiwan.
The Premier may have ordered the suspension of work on the plant but refused to cancel the nine billion dollar project. He expressed the hope that public consideration and discussion before the referendum would lead to a change of opinion in favor of completing the plant. The Premier is also hoping to prevent a replay of the repercussions of the DPP announcement in 2000. If the fourth nuclear power plant is never completed, there are estimates that the cost of electricity may rise by forty percent in order to subsidize the use of wind, solar and natural gas for the generation of electricity.
Taiwan anti-nuclear protestors: