The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
I have often remarked in posts about Fukushima how lax the Japanese Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA). The Agency is entirely to friendly and forgiving of the industry that it is supposed to be regulating. This phenomena, known as “regulatory capture” is not limited to Japan. It seems to be endemic among the nations that have major nuclear industries. There have recently been several new stories about the failures of the JAEA.
I have posted articles about the problems at the Monju fast breeder reactor in Japan. Recently, the Japanese Nuclear Regulatory Authority (JNRA) instructed the JAEA to keep the Monju reactor shut down because fourteen thousand pieces of equipment had not been properly inspected. The JNRA is an administrative department of the Japanese legislature. It is part of the Department of Environment and it is charged with insuring nuclear safety in Japan.
The inspection failures were found as part of an investigation into whether the Monju site was being properly secured against possible terrorist attacks. In addition to the failute to inspect the equipment that records vehicles and people who enter the Monju site, the managers of the site also failed to document the identification of people who entered especially sensitive area, failed to conduct background checks on people who entered of the Monju site, and failed to fence off restricted areas. The JNRA said that “the levels of neglect witnessed at Monju were unprecedented” and laid the blame with the JAEA.
In October the Mainichi Shimbun, a daily newspaper in Tokyo, reported that almost half of the nuclear power plant equipment exported from Japan in the last ten years was not properly inspected by the Japanese government. Apparently, exported equipment was only inspected if the exporter got a loan from the Japan Bank for International Cooperation or applied for insurance from the Nippon Export and Investment Service. About one billion dollars worth of nuclear equipment were exported to twenty three countries and territories. Only about a half a billion dollars worth of the equipment was inspected by the Japanese government. The uninspected equipment includes such critical components as reactor pressure vessels and control rod system.
Japanese Prime Minister Abe has been promoting the nuclear industry in Japan as the corner stone of his ecomonic development plans. He has been traveling around the world trying to convince other countries to purchase Japanese nuclear technology, promoting it as the safest nuclear equipment in the world. This is bad enough when Japanese nuclear technology is offered to countries with major nuclear power installations but it is almost criminal when uninspected Japanese nuclear power equipment is being offered to third world countries such as Viet Nam. To sweeten the deal, Japan offer to take the spent nuclear fuel away from Viet Nam. Considering that Japan has no permanent nuclear disposal facility and that Japanese spent fuel pools are filling up, this may not be such a good deal for Japan. When uninspected Japanese nuclear equipment is installed in third world countries that are high on the corruption index, nuclear disasters are almost guaranteed.
Fukushima isotopes are nearing the U.S. west coast. enenews.com
Highest ever radiation levels detected outside reactor buildings at Fukushima. enenews.com
A leaching tank has failed at the Ranger uranium mine in Australia, releasing a large volume of acidic slurry mixture. world-nuclear-news.org
A moisture separator problem tripped the Hope Creek reactor in New Jersey for the second time in less than a week Thursday. nuclearstreet.com
The governments of Japan, America and Canada have covered up the severity of the Fukushima crisis ever since it started in March 2011. globalresearch.ca
Japan has adopted a more proactive approach towards addressing the many complex challenges posed by the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant, an international expert mission has concluded. world-nuclear-news.org
The Japanese government is planning to establish nuclear power as an “important base source of power” in Japan. fukuleaks.com
The Japanese secrets bill promoters have war criminals and wartime police officials in their family trees. japan-press.co.jp
The Fort Calhoun nuclear plant idled since flooding and a fire at the site during a refueling outage in 2011 has formally asked regulators to restart. nuclearstreet.com
A project backed by 43 organizations is preparing Europe to react and communicate effectively in case of a nuclear emergency, drawing on the lessons of the Fukushima accident. world-nuclear-news.org
Yesterday, I brought the story of the North Korean nuclear program up to May of 2013 and what is known as the North Korean Crisis. North Korea had just declared war on South Korea and was hurling threats at the U.S. and Japan too.
In June of 2013 N.K. refused the Chinese demand that they stop testing nuclear weapons. N.K. agreed to reopen talks with South Korea on the Kaesong Industrial Region (KIR) but then cancelled the talks in a disagreement over the delegate list. The Chinese President came to the U.S. to talk with the U.S. President about the N.K. situation. N.K. proposed high-level talks with the U.S. to end the crisis. China and N.K. proposed a restart of the six party talks. The U.S. President extended a state of emergency regarding N.K. declared by the previous administration. The U.S. sanctioned the Daedong Credit Bank because it has provided funds for N.K. nuclear weapons development. Russia announced that it would talk to N.K. about the six party talks. Japan pulled back on antimissile deployment and ended the standing order to shoot down N.K. missiles.
In July the N.K. Foreign Minister requested that the U.S. resume bilateral negotiations without any preconditions. N.K. reconnected the hotline between N.K. and S.K. Negotiations were called for to reopen the KIR. The Vice President of China started a visit to N.K. to celebrate the anniversary of the Korean War and to rebuild the China-N.K. relationship. S.K. makes an offer about reopening the KIR and encourages N.K. to accept the offer.
In August N.K. rescinded its ban on industrial operations at KIR. S.K. and N.K. sign a plan to restart KIR operations. N.K. called for a “new start” to the relationship between the two Koreas. In September a S.K. ministry issued a press release stating the there would be a test of KIR operations in mid-September. The N.K. Crisis seemed to be drawing to a close.
In October hostilities flared again. N.K. mobilized its army and threatened the U.S. with a “horrible disaster.” Then N.K. warned that there could be “retaliatory strikes” and an “all out war of justice” against the U.S. U.S. military exercises on the peninsula were called “nuclear blackmail.” N.K. prepared to launched more test missiles. S.K. leaflets dropped over N.K. prompted N.K. to threaten attacks. In November N.K. threatened the U.S., Japan and S.K. with a “nuclear catastrophe if S.K. “provocations” continued. U.S. intelligent sources reported that there has been new construction at the N.K. missile launching site to allow the handling of larger missiles.
In December Kim Jong-Un’s uncle of the N.K. dictator, who was the number two man in the N.K. government was purged in what has been seen as consolidation of power in the hands of the new leader, Kim Jong-un. So we have returned to the familiar situation of confusion over the intentions and future of N.K. in the community of nations.
North Korean missile site:
