The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
TEPCO released a brief report on the bent fuel assembly in unit 4′s spent fuel pool. fukuleaks.org
An environmental review of Duke Energy’s proposed Lee nuclear plant 40 miles southwest of Charlotte recommends that federal authorities issue it a construction and operating license. charlotteobserver.com
Last week the European Commission (EC) began an investigation into the support that the British government is giving to the project to construct a new reactor at Hinkley Point C in Somerset. The Chinese have bought into the project which has concerned some departments in the British Government that deal with foreign investment in British projects. Two Areva ERP reactor reactors are to be built by EDF, the French nuclear contactor. The new reactors are expected to be generating over three gigawatts of electricity by 2023.
The EC is questioning whether the involvement of the British Government in the project to ensure predictable revenues for EDF for the next thirty five years will violate European Union (EU) rules covering state aid for commercial ventures. The British government could end up providing as much as twenty seven billion dollars to EDF depending on actual capital costs that EDF incurs. EU law says that a member state can give support to a commercial venture only to the extent that that commercial venture could have gotten the same level of support from the marketplace.
The deal between the British government and EDF stipulates that if the future price of electricity drops below the agreed level, the British government will step in and pay EDF the difference. On the other hand, if the price of electricity rises above the market price, EDF will pay the difference to the British government. The British government explains that this will guarantee that the plant operator will “receive a fixed level of revenues and will therefore not be exposed to market risks for the duration of the scheme.”
The British government offers the same guarantee to low-carbon energy sources including renewables such as wind and solar. Each type has a set strike price which the government supports. However, nuclear power plants do not have the same sort of blanket guaranteed support. Each nuclear project has to considered individually.
The EC is worried that British governmental support could potentially distort the British energy market and even affect the entire EU energy market. This investigation is timely in that the British government has recently announced plans for a massive build up of nuclear power generation to bring sixteen gigawatts of new nuclear capacity online by 2030. If they provided the same sort of support for all the new reactors that they are planning for the Hinkley Point project, this could have a big impact on the EU energy market. In order to be successful, the investigation will need to have cooperation from all the public and private players involved in Hinkley Point.
In the United States and other nuclear countries, the sort of price support the British are offering EDF for Hinkley Point are being abandoned in favor of letting nuclear power compete in the open energy marketplace. This change is already making conventional investment source reluctant to bet on nuclear given that there is an oil glut in the international market and cheap natural gas is lowering the price of electricity. Even renewable electrical generation such as wind and solar are beginning to beat out nuclear in bids for new generation capacity. I have said it before and I will repeat it. Nuclear power is just not commercially viable.
Cutaway drawing of a U.K. ERP reactor:
Various religions and cults have predicted the imminent end of the world for thousands of years. Some have been content to merely comment while others have actively sought to prevent it and others work to make it happen. There has been a worrisome trend among Christians who believe that we are currently in what they call the End Times and that Jesus will soon return to judge mankind. The Christian Dominionists believe that the U.S. should become a theocracy before the world ends. They have members and supporters in the U.S. Congress. Some of the U.S. support for Israel is predicated on the idea that certain things have to happen in the Middle East before Jesus can return. The reason that I bring up the subject is that I recently read about a doomsday cult in Japan that believes that nuclear war will inevitably destroy the world.
The Japanese cult called Sukyo Mahikari is said to be the fastest growing doomsday cult in the world with over a million members. They believe in Jewish Freemasons are conspiring to take over the world. The holy book of the cult is called the Goseigen or the “Book of Warnings.” It was “revealed” by the “Creator God” to Yoshikazu Okada in the early 1960s. The book says that the “perishing , ending and collapse of civilization is imminent ” and that “the subhumans will be destroyed in nuclear fireballs. It says that “Earth must be burnt away with the Ball of Fire in order for God to descend from Heaven” and “the production of fireballs in the world cannot be stopped.” The chosen – members of the cult – will create a new holy Japanese empire after the necessary purging of the unworthy.
The cult enjoys the support of high level politicians such as the neo-nationalist Shintaro Ishihara who is featured in cult literature and referred to as a friend of Okada. In order for an organization to have legitimacy in Japan, it must be sponsored by influential people. Ishihara was the mayor of Tokyo and became a leader of the Japan Restoration Party which was founded in 2012. It is dedicated to “reasserting Japan’s correct place in the world.” They currently have fifty four seats in the lower house of the Japanese Diet and nine seats in the upper house. They are opposed to the close relationship of the U.S. and Japan.
Mixing politics and religions is a very bad idea. When doomsday religion intrudes into the halls of power, there is a danger that policy decisions might be aimed at bringing about the apocalypse, not avoiding it. Japan is a powerful industrial nation with mature nuclear industry. Their constitution forbids them from having nuclear weapons but there have been calls for that prohibition to end. With their plutonium reactor and their technological expertise, it would not take long for Japan to build nuclear weapons and delivery systems if they wanted to. Considering the unstable regime in North Korea which has been threatening Japan with nuclear attacks and the new belligerence of China in claiming control of disputed islands to the south of Japan, there is very real pressure on Japan to become a nuclear nation. If that should happen and the Mahikari cult continues to gain adherents and political power, the danger of a nuclear exchange in western Pacific increases.
Sukyo Mahikari Temple Number 2:
