The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for February 15, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 15, 2024

    Ambient office = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Redleaf lettuce from Central Market = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 86 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 852 – Russia Rumored To Be Working On An Orbital Nuclear Anti-satellite Weapon – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Weapons 852 – Russia Rumored To Be Working On An Orbital Nuclear Anti-satellite Weapon – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         “Starfish Prime was a high-altitude nuclear test conducted by the United States, a joint effort of the Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) and the Defense Atomic Support Agency. It was launched from Johnston Atoll on July 9, 1962, and was the largest nuclear test conducted in outer space, and one of five conducted by the US in space.
         A Thor rocket carrying a W49 thermonuclear warhead (designed at Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory) and a Mk. 2 reentry vehicle was launched from Johnston Atoll in the Pacific Ocean, about 900 miles (1,450 km) west-southwest of Hawaii. The explosion took place at an altitude of 250 miles (400 km), above a point 19 miles (31 km) southwest of Johnston Atoll. It had a yield of 1.4 Mt (5.9 PJ). The explosion was about 10° above the horizon as seen from Hawaii, at 11 pm Hawaii time.
         The Starfish test was one of five high-altitude tests grouped together as Operation Fishbowl within the larger Operation Dominic, a series of tests in 1962 begun in response to the Soviet announcement on August 30, 1961, that they would end a three-year moratorium on testing.” Wikipedia

         The effects of the Starfish Prime test were far more devastating than the Pentagon had estimated. It brought about a treaty that banned the deployment of nuclear weapons in space. In an instant, an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) knocked out hundreds of streetlights in Hawaii, some 900 miles away.
         However, it was in space where the most powerful effects were felt. Within minutes of the detonation, the blast had created a fire ball and a glowing red aurora was clearly visible to observers hundreds of miles below.
         Unexpectedly, energetic electrons released during the high-altitude nuclear blast became trapped by the Earth’s magnetic field. They formed radiation belts that lingered for several months after the detonation. As they travelled around the planet, these electrons destroyed or damaged one third of all satellites in low orbit at the time. This destruction included some satellites that were located on the other side of the Earth. Among the satellites damaged was the UK’s first orbital satellite, Ariel One.
         It is partly the result of Starfish Prime that has driven the current alarm at reports that Russia is developing a new space-based anti-satellite (ASAT) weapon. Insiders familiar with the classified information state that the weapon system is still under development and has not been deployed in orbit. The Russian ASAT is said to include a nuclear component.
         The precise nature of this nuclear component remains uncertain at this time. Two prevailing theories suggest that the Russia ASAT contains either a nuclear warhead or a nuclear-power system.
         The possibility of a nuclear-armed anti-satellite weapon raises questions as to what it could be used for militarily. Russia has demonstrated in the past its capability to conduct conventional strikes against satellites with ASATs. In November 2021, Moscow was widely condemned for carrying out a conventional ASAT test. It produced so much space debris that it posed a temporary threat to the International Space Station.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for February 14, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 14, 2024

    Ambient outside = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1345 – The European Commission Supports The Development and Deployment of Small Modular Reactors – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1345 – The European Commission Supports The Development and Deployment of Small Modular Reactors – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Yves Desbazeille continued, “There are several challenges which need to be tackled to ensure the smooth deployment of SMRs in Europe. Therefore, we are delighted that the commission is moving ahead with this alliance in order to work on viable solutions to overcome these challenges.”
         Urenco was actively engaged in the creation of the European SMR Pre-Partnership. It welcomed the launch of the Industrial Alliance. “The increased global demand to reduce emissions and strengthen energy security is increasing the focus on new nuclear technologies such as SMRs and AMRs, as well as the fuels needed to power them. The alliance will help to further increase confidence in the sector by facilitating the necessary conditions across the supply chain to accelerate the development of these new technologies in a safe, efficient, and secure manner, and Urenco looks forward to supporting the Alliance through the relevant working groups.”
         The announcement of the launch of the Industrial Alliance for SMRs followed the publication by the Commission of a detailed impact assessment on possible pathways to reach the agreed goal of making the European Union climate neutral by 2050. The EU’s 2030 climate goal is to reduce net greenhouse gas emissions by at least 55% relative to 1990 levels. Based on the latest impact assessment, the European Commission recommends a 90% net greenhouse gas emissions reduction by 2040 compared with 1990 levels, launching a discussion with all stakeholders. A legislative proposal will be made by the next Commission, after the European election. It must be agreed with by the European Parliament and Member States as required under the EU Climate Law.
         The commission said, “Today’s communication also sets out a number of enabling policy conditions which are necessary to achieve the 90% target. They include the full implementation of the agreed 2030 framework, ensuring the competitiveness of the European industry, a greater focus on a just transition that leaves no one behind, a level playing field with international partners, and a strategic dialogue on the post-2030 framework, including with industry and the agricultural sector.”
        The commission added, “Setting a 2040 climate target will help European industry, investors, citizens and governments to make decisions in this decade that will keep the EU on track to meet its climate neutrality objective in 2050. It will send important signals on how to invest and plan effectively for the longer term, minimizing the risks of stranded assets … It will also boost Europe’s resilience against future crises, and notably strengthen the EU’s energy independence from fossil fuel imports, which accounted for over 4% of GDP in 2022 as we faced the consequences of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine. The costs and human impacts of climate change are increasingly large, and visible.”
        The Commission noted that the energy sector is expected to achieve full decarbonization shortly after 2040, “based on all zero and low-carbon energy solutions, including renewables, nuclear, energy efficiency, storage, CCS, CCU, carbon removals, geothermal and hydro”.

  • Geiger Readings for February 13, 202

    Geiger Readings for February 13, 202

    Ambient office = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Mini cucumber from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 146 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 139 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1344 – The European Commission Supports The Development and Deployment of Small Modular Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1344 – The European Commission Supports The Development and Deployment of Small Modular Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         The European Commission has launched an Industrial Alliance dedicated to small modular reactors (SMRs). They are aiming to facilitate the development of SMRs in Europe by the early 2030s. The announcement came as part of the commission’s assessment for a 2040 climate target for the EU.
        The European Commission established a European SMR pre-Partnership in June last year with the primary objective of identifying enabling conditions and constraints, including financial ones, towards safe design, construction and operation of SMRs in Europe in the next decade and beyond. The pre-Partnership will be in compliance with the EU legislative framework in general and to the Euratom legislative framework in particular.
         Early last November, it announced that it would create an Industrial Alliance for SMRs early this year. Industrial alliances are a way in which to facilitate stronger cooperation and joint action between all interested partners. Industrial alliances can play a role in achieving important EU policy objectives through joint action by all the interested partners.
        The commission said in a statement on 6 February, “The commission is also launching an Industrial Alliance to facilitate stakeholder’s cooperation at EU level and to accelerate the deployment of SMRs and ensure a strong EU supply chain, including a skilled workforce. This will leverage EU’s manufacturing and innovation capacities to accelerate the deployment of first SMR projects in the EU by early 2030 under the highest standards of nuclear safety, environmental sustainability, and industrial competitiveness.”
         According to the commission, this Industrial Alliance will develop a Strategic Action Plan in order to identify the following. Technically mature and commercially viable SMR technologies that could be supported under the alliance must be selected. Potential gaps and solutions in the European supply chain for SMRs (including fuel and raw materials) must be identified. Investment barriers, funding opportunities and new financial blending options to support SMR development must be found. Finally, future needs for research on SMRs and advanced modular reactors (AMRs) must be identified and existing skills gaps along the supply chain must be addressed under the Euratom Research and Training Program, and at national level.
         A call for organizations interested in alliance membership will open shortly. All public and private legal entities which satisfy a set of eligibility membership criteria can apply for membership. In addition, next month, a dissemination event covering the scope, objectives and activities of the Industrial Alliance is expected to be organized in Brussels.
        The European nuclear trade body Nucleareurope has been instrumental in the creation of the SMR Alliance. It said, “Thanks to the work undertaken as Chair of the European SMR pre-Partnership Steering Committee and our outreach to Members of the European Parliament that culminated in the overwhelming adoption of an Own Initiative Report on SMRs.”
         Yves Desbazeille is the Nucleareurope Director General. He said, “The deployment of SMRs will bring significant benefits to Europe, including greater energy sovereignty, lower CO2 emissions, new jobs and economic growth. The European nuclear industry has been at the forefront of innovation and industrial excellence for decades and this Industrial Alliance will help maintain our industry’s world class position”.
    Please read Part 2 next