The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Radioactive Waste 924 – Hanford Vitrification Plant Will Be In Operation Soon – Part 1 of 2 Part

    Radioactive Waste 924 – Hanford Vitrification Plant Will Be In Operation Soon – Part 1 of 2 Part

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         The Hanford Nuclear reservation in Benton County, Washington is said to be one of the most radioactively contaminated installations in the World. The U.S. used the site to create weapons grade plutonium for the U.S. military. There are fifty-five million gallons of radioactive waste on the site. Currently there is an estimated timeline reaching into the 2080s for cleaning up the site.
         There is a complex assembly including several state and federal agencies, private contractors, tens of thousands of workers, local residents, and advocates who are all invested in a colossal effort to clean up Hanford. It is estimated to be the largest nuclear cleanup project in the world.
         The Hanford site is at a pivotal moment. It is set to finally transform the nuclear leftovers of a century past into glass that can be safely stored. This process is called vitrification. Last October, the first of two melters used to vitrify the waste were put into operation. The second melter is scheduled to launch this spring.
         Nikolas Peterson is the executive director of Hanford Challenge, a nonprofit watchdog. He said, “They’re doing something out there that has never been done before. I think I have to constantly remind myself of that even when I’m critical of the facility.”
         For staff at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), who are developing and testing the glass formulations for immobilizing radioactive waste, this moment in time feels significant.
         Tom Brouns is the lead of the environmental manager sector at PNNL. He has worked at Hanford for more than 30 years. He said, “It’s really exciting to see how far it’s come. It’s taking a long time but it’s so close.”
         Vitrification is not a novel technology. The same process is used in making pottery. High heat is applied to a material that leads to metamorphosis of the original substance.
         Researchers in France have studied the vitrification of nuclear waste since the 1950s. The country successfully built several facilities to tackle the cleanup of radioactive waste. Within this specialized industry, it’s considered one of the best methods to stabilize radioactive waste. It is expensive but it performs well over hundreds or thousands of years. Vitrification is an international standard when it comes to managing waste with high levels of radioactivity.
         The process being developed to vitrify radioactive waste at Hanford is highly complex and involves multiple steps.
         The process begins with a removal system that separates high-level waste that’s more toxic and radioactive from low-activity waste that is simpler to process and store. Separating the waste is critical to better management, treatment and disposal.
         According to a 2023 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), about 95% of the waste in storage tanks is low-level waste when it comes to the physical volume. High-level waste only compromises about 5% of the volume but includes more than 70% of the radioactivity.
         The low-level waste is pumped to a separate holding tank and is then pumped into another tank for mixing. Silica along with other additives are added to create the material that will ultimately be glass.
         That mixture is pumped into melters which are giant three-hundred-ton devices that are the “heart” of the vitrification process. These generate heat at 2,100 degrees Fahrenheit and will create a molten substance over several days. This molten material is poured into stainless steel canisters where it eventually cools enough to become solid glass.
        Brouns explained that “Glass is a superior matrix because the radio nuclei actually get trapped in the chemical matrix of the glass.”
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for February 26, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 26, 2024

    Ambient office = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 136 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 91 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for February 25, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 25, 2024

    Ambient office = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 107 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Crimini mushroom from Central Market = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 77 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for February 24, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 24, 2024

    Ambient office = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 107 nanosieverts per hour

    Ginger root from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 98 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 64 – Researchers At The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Are Using Artificial Intelligence To Control Plasma Instabilities In Real Time

    Nuclear Fusion 64 – Researchers At The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Are Using Artificial Intelligence To Control Plasma Instabilities In Real Time

         Scientists pursuing fusion energy say they have found a way to overcome one of their biggest challenges to date — by using artificial intelligence.
         Nuclear fusion has for decades been promoted as a near-limitless source of clean energy. That would be a game-changing solution to the climate crisis. However, experts have only achieved and sustained fusion energy for a few seconds, and many obstacles remain, including instabilities in the highly complex process.
         There are several ways to achieve fusion energy. The most common involves using hydrogen isotopes as an input fuel and raising temperatures and pressures to extraordinarily high levels in a donut-shaped machine, known as a tokamak, to create a plasma, a soup-like state of matter.
         But that plasma has to be carefully controlled and is vulnerable to “tearing” and escaping the machine’s powerful magnetic fields that are designed to keep the plasma contained.
         Last Wednesday, researchers from Princeton University and the Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) published a report in the journal Nature that they had found a way to use artificial intelligence (AI) to forecast these potential instabilities and prevent them from happening in real time.
         The team executed their experiments at the DIII-D National Fusion Facility in San Diego. They found that their AI controller could forecast potential plasma tearing up to 300 milliseconds in advance. Without that intervention, the fusion reaction would have ended suddenly.
         A Princeton spokesperson said, “The experiments provide a foundation for using AI to solve a broad range of plasma instabilities, which have long hindered fusion energy.”
         Egemen Kolemen is a professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering at Princeton University and an author of the study. He said that the findings are “definitely” a step forward for nuclear fusion.
         Kolemen said in a recent interview, “This is one of the big roadblocks — disruptions — and you want any reactor to be operating 24/7 for years without any problem. And these types of disruption and instabilities would be very problematic, so developing solutions like this increase their confidence that we can run these machines without any issues.”
         Fusion energy is the process that powers the sun and all the other stars, and scientists have been trying for decades to master it on Earth. It is achieved when two atoms are fused together, releasing huge amounts of energy. It’s the opposite of nuclear fission which relies on splitting atoms to generate heat. Nuclear fission is the current basis of nuclear power.
         Scientists and engineers near the English city of Oxford recently set a new nuclear fusion energy record, sustaining 69 megajoules of fusion energy for five seconds, using just 0.2 milligrams of fuel. That would be sufficient to power roughly twelve thousand households.
         However, that experiment still used more energy as input than it generated. Another team in California managed to produce a net amount of fusion energy in December 2022, in a process called “ignition.” They have replicated ignition three times since.
         Despite the promising progress, fusion energy is a long way from becoming commercially available. Some analysts say that it will arrive too late to provide the pollution free energy needed to stave off worsening impacts of the climate crisis. Climate scientists say those pollution cuts are required this decade.

  • Geiger Readings for February 23, 2024

    Geiger Readings for February 23, 2024

    Ambient office = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 120 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Green onion from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 80 nanosieverts per hour