The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Moab Cleanup and the Shape of Things to Come

                  In previous posts, I have talked about how uranium mining has been disastrous for indigenous peoples and the environment in remote and desolate areas of the world. I have also mentioned my concern that nuclear companies may go bankrupt and dump the costs of cleaning up nuclear waste on the government and the taxpayers. Today’s post brings both of these concerns together.

                  Near Moab, Utah, a uranium mine and mill operation started processing uranium in 1956 under the ownership of the Uranium Reduction Company. The mine and mill were purchased by the Atlas Uranium Corporation in 1962 and continued to operate until 1984. The mining operation covered over one half of a square mile that came within 750 feet of the Colorado River which provides drinking water for twenty five million people. By the time that the mine was shut down, about one third of the site was covered by a layer of radioactive uranium mine tailings over seventy five feet thick. There were sixteen million gallons of tons of tailings in that layer.  Since the mine and mill were closed in 1982 due to a soft market for uranium, the pile of tailings has been leaking contamination into the soil, the aquifer below the land, and the Colorado River. By the late 1990, the level of uranium in the soil beneath the layer of tailings was over thirty times the safe limit. It is estimated that nearly thirty thousand gallons of contaminated water from the tailings flow into the Colorado River every year.

                  The Atlas Uranium Corporation proposed that a “cap” of rock and clay be used to cover and seal in the tailings. After an extensive regulatory battle over whether the proposed cap would be sufficient to protect the environment, the Corporation declared bankruptcy in 1998.  The responsibility for cleaning up the mess at the mine was transferred to the U.S. Department of Energy for remediation in 2001. Following the bankruptcy, there were legal and legislative battles fought by local residents who wanted the tailings relocated to a safer place away from the Colorado River. Work began in 2009 to move the tailings to the Crescent Junction engineered disposal cell, about thirty miles to the north.

                 As of June, 2013 about six million tons or forty percent of the tailings had been shipped to Crescent Junction. The Obama administration has budgeted about thirty six million dollars for the cleanup operation in the budget for fiscal year 2014. It is estimated that the project will take until the year 2025 to complete. A 2008 estimate of the eventual cost of the project concluded that about three quarters of a billion dollars of taxpayers’ money would have to be spent.

                 A company in the nuclear industry made money from mining and selling uranium and then declared bankruptcy, walking away from the pile of radioactive mile tailing. The federal government will ultimately be paying nearly three quarters of a billion dollars to clean up the mess left by the company. What I would like to know is whether or not that three quarters of a billion dollars will ever be included in the calculations that we hear about the cost of nuclear power. Another question I have is how much more the U.S. taxpayers will have to pay to clean up the messes left by the nuclear industry.

     

     

  • Geiger Readings for June 26, 2013

    Geiger Counter Readings in Seattle, WA on June 26, 2013

    Ambient office = .128 microsieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = .097 microsieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = .088 microsieverts per hour

    Vine ripened tomatoes from Costco =  .085 microsieverts per hour

    Tap water = .082 microsieverts per hour

    Filtered water = .065 microsieverts per hour

  • Personal Ways of Dealing with Radiation Exposure

                  There are many different ways that a person can be exposed to ionizing radiation in the world we live in. Some possibilities are food and meat grown in an area polluted by radioactive materials, medical diagnostic procedures, medical treatment, fallout from nuclear accidents, fallout from terrorist dirty bombs, fallout and direct radiation from nuclear weapons, and even naturally occurring sources such as radon gas from the soil. While taking iodine pills to protect thyroid glands from radioactive iodine-131 exposure is commonly mentioned, the average person may be uncertain that there is anything that he or she could do if exposed to radiation. Here are some recommendations:

    Psychosomatic medicine has shown that a positive attitude generally helps strengthen the immune system and assists recovery from a variety of health problems. While it might be difficult to maintain a positive attitude after radiation exposure, it is important that an exposed person not descend into depression and pessimism.

     Astralgalus has been a part of the herbal Chinese system of medicine for centuries. It not only boosts the immune system but has been shown to help restore a damaged immune system to normal functioning. It has few side effects and is helpful in dealing with physiological stress.

     Bentonite clay can remove the toxic by-products of radiation damage from the body. Native Americans recognized this type of soil as a healing agent. A layer of bentonite mud can also actively protect the human body from radiation and chemical toxins. 

    Blue-Green algae and marine phytoplankton such as spirulina and chlorella can lower the level of heavy metals and radiation in the human body. They also benefit the immune system. They produce oxygen which can help alter the pH in the body someone who is been exposed to radiation.

     

     Ginkgo bilboa is another Chinese herbal medicine in use for thousands of years. This herb has been shown to protect lymphocytes against damage from radiation if it can be taken before radiation exposure.

    Kombucha tea is made from a fermented mushroom tea and is used to alter the pH in the body which can assist in healing. It also provides healthy probiotics for the digestive tract. President Ronald Reagan claimed that he cured a case of stomach cancer with Kombucha tea.

     Lingzhi mushrooms have been recognized for millenia as being beneficial for health and healing. Research has shown that a chemical in these mushrooms called polysaccharide beta-1,3-D-glucan enhances the immune system by increasing the level of macrophage T-cells. Lingzhi mushrooms can reduce nausea caused by radiation exposure as well as help prevent damage to the kidneys.

                 All of these herbs and compounds are available to the general public and can be of use in fighting off the health effects of radiation exposure. Given that the probability of being exposed to radiation in increasing every day, it is a good idea to be familiar with popular and common products that might be beneficial in case of exposure.  

  • Geiger Readings for June 23, 2013

    Geiger Counter Readings in Seattle, WA on June 24, 2013

    Ambient office = .125 microsieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = .115 microsieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = .082 microsieverts per hour

    Iceberg lettuce from local grocery store =  .092 microsieverts per hour

    Tap water = .081 microsieverts per hour

    Filtered water = .067 microsieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for June 23, 2013

    Geiger Counter Readings in Seattle, WA on June 23, 2013

    Ambient office = .080 microsieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = .077 microsieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = .067 microsieverts per hour

    Iceberg lettuce from local grocery store =  .100 microsieverts per hour

    Tap water = .073 microsieverts per hour

    Filtered water = .065 microsieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 35 – Duke Energy’s Pattern of Misbehavior

                  I have mentioned Duke Energy in several past posts. The headquarters of Duke Energy is located in Charlotte, North Carolina. It is the biggest electric power holding company in the United States and it also has assets in Canada and Latin America. The fifty eight thousand megawatts that it generates is distributed to seven million customers in a territory of over one hundred thousand square miles. Duke generates electricity from hydro, oil, natural gas, coal and nuclear energy. Duke Energy owns and operates four nuclear power plants in North Carolina, two plants in South Carolina and one plant in Florida. A total of twelve nuclear reactors are located at the seven power plants. Duke has applied for constructions permits and licenses for four additional reactors.

                  In 1999, Duke was the target of an enforcement action by the EPA because they were trying to get out of having to get permits under the Clean Air Act for modifications to old coal burning power plants. The case went all the way to the Supreme Court and Duke was ordered to comply with the Clean Air Act. In 2002, Duke Energy was forced to restate their financial reports due to false or incorrect accounting. As of 2005, Duke Energy was rated as 13th in list of polluting energy producing companies. Environmental activists have opposed and are opposing new energy plant projects of Duke Energy. Duke has been criticized for spending seventeen million on lobbying, not paying any taxes and receiving over two hundred million dollars in tax rebates while making five billion four hundred million dollars in profits in the period for 2008 to 2010.

                  Duke has decided to shut down the Florida reactor at the Crystal River plant because the required repairs would cost too much. Florida has a law which allows utility companies such as Duke to charge customers for construction of new nuclear reactors and repairs of existing nuclear reactors before the work even begins. As the law is currently written, the utility can keep the additional money collected even if the work is never done. Florida is trying to revoke that part of the law. With the decision to close the Crystal River reactor, Duke is going to refund some of the extra money that it had collected. There is a battle between Duke and a nuclear insurance company over how much money the insurance company will have to pay customers for the extra cost of electricity after the Crystal River reactor was shut down.

                 Duke’s Shearon Harris nuclear reactor has been the center of controversy. Between 1999 and 2003 the reactor had to be shut down twelve times. The national average for U.S. nuclear plants would be two or three shutdowns in a four year period. Studies suggested that the spent fuel pool was the greatest danger at Shearon Harris and that there was a possibility that it could over-heat and burn. Some critics claim that Shearon Harris is the most dangerous nuclear reactor in the United States. This year, a small crack forced the shutdown of the reactor. The crack should have been detected when the reactor was shut down for refueling last year and the NRC is investigating. Duke has halted work on the construction of two new reactors at Shearon Harris because of the current soft electricity market.

                A watchdog group is demanding that North Carolina utility regulators levy at least five million dollars in penalties against Duke Energy for over-charging its customers millions of dollars and spending money on campaign contributions and sponsoring a professional basketball team. Duke Energy has a track record of over-charging customers, neglecting nuclear power plant maintenance, polluting the environment, trying to skirt environmental regulations, avoiding taxes, and other types of corporate bad behavior. This is not a company that I trust when it comes to the safe operation of nuclear power plants.