The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Uranium 2 – Properties

              Uranium is a naturally occurring radioactive chemical element. It was formed in super novae explosions about 6.6 billion years ago. In its pure form it is a silvery colored heavy metal. It is 70% denser than lead but not quite as dense as gold and will burn in a powdered form. A little softer than steel, it is malleable, ductile, paramagnetic, weakly electropositive and a poor conductor of electricity. It will oxidize in air and can be dissolved by acids.

              Uranium is a common element that is present in low concentrations of a few parts per million in soil, rocks and water. It is thought to be forty times as abundant as silver. Uranium can react with most of the non-metallic elements and their compounds. Hundreds of minerals contain uranium. Uraninite, autunite, uranphane, torbernite, coffinite and pitchblende are common ores of uranium with uraninite being the most abundant.

              The most common and stable form of uranium found in nature is an oxide called triuranium. Each molecule contains 3 uranium atoms and 8 oxygen atoms. Uranium dioxide which contains 1 atom of uranium and 2 atoms of oxygen is the most common nuclear fuel used in nuclear reactors.

              The symbol for uranium is the letter “U”. The nucleus of the uranium atom contains 92 protons which is the atomic number. In the periodic table, uranium is a member of the actinoids group of transitional elements. Some of the actinoids do not occur in nature and are created by nuclear transmutation processes.

              The nucleus of the uranium atom also contains from 141 to 146 neutrons creating six different isotopes referred to as U-233 to U-238. All of the isotopes are unstable and radioactive. Most (99.274 %) of natural uranium is in the form of the U-238 isotope. A little (.720 %) natural uranium is the U-235 isotope and a tiny (.005%) amount is U-234.

              Uranium decays slowly by emission of particle consisting of two protons and two neutrons also known as an alpha particle. The half-life of U-238 is 4.5 billion years and the half-life of U-235 is 700 million years. Uranium, thorium and plutonium are the three fissile elements which can disintegrate into lighter elements. Isotopes of these elements go through radioactive decay processes where a series of elements create other elements until a stable non-radioactive element is reached.

               U-235 is the only naturally occurring elementary isotope that is capable of sustaining a nuclear chain reaction. When bombarded with slow neutrons, U-235 converts temporarily to U-238 which immediately disintegrates into the noble gas krypton, Kr-85, the alkaline earth metal barium, Ba-141creating heat and release more neutrons. The K5-85 and Ba-141 are unstable and also decay. If more U-235 atoms are hit by these neutrons, a chain reaction can occur. It is thought that the heat generated by the disintegration of U-235 provides most of the heat in the interior of the Earth that keeps the core liquid and drives plate tectonics.

     

  • Uranium 1 – History

              A piece of yellow glass made around 79 AD colored with uranium from found near Naples, Italy is the first known use of uranium. The uranium mineral called pitchblende or uraninite was noticed and reported as long ago as 1565 in mines in Saxony in northwest Germany. Uranium was first recovered in 1789 from analysis of mineral samples from the Joachimsal silver mine in the Czech Republic by a German chemist named Martin Heinrich Klaproth. Klaproth named this new mineral for the planet Uranus. Within the next 15 years, uranium was found in England, France, Austria and Romania but in ores much poorer that in the mines of Joachimsal.

              During the 1800s, uranium ore was extracted as a byproduct of mining in Saxony, Bohemia and Cornwall. Oxides of uranium were used for fabrication of steel alloys, chemical experiments and as a pigment to add color to dyes, inks, glass and ceramics. Vases and glassware were given a yellow-green color and crockery was colored from orange to bright red with the addition of uranium.

              Pure metallic uranium was first prepared by the French chemist Eugene Peligot in 1841. In 1870, Russian Chemist Dimitri Mendeleyev used his periodic table classification system to show that uranium was the heaviest and highest atomic weight element naturally present on Earth. By 1900, over 1000 scientific papers had been published on the chemical and health effects of uranium.

              In 1896, French chemist Henri Becquerel discovered natural radioactivity when he noticed that uranium salts left near photographic plates fogged the plates. Marie and Pierre Curie followed up on Becquerel’s research and discovered a new element in 1898 they named radium. Ernest Rutherford from New Zealand and  English chemist Frederick Soddy proposed a theory of radioactive transformation. Radium was understood to have been created by the transmutation of uranium. Eventually it was found that naturally occurring uranium was weakly radioactive and that through a process of decay, a series of elements was created with the final element being non-radioactive lead.

              During the early Twentieth century, uranium was overshadowed by its daughter element, radium. Increasing demand for radium used in creating fluorescence displays and tumor treatments increased the demand for uranium and uranium mining expanded. Prior to World War II, most of the uranium mined in the United States came from mixed ores of vanadium and uranium.

              In the 1930, Leo Szilard conceived of a chain reaction which he believed could be fueled by uranium. A few years after his discovery, he contacted Albert Einstein because he feared that Germany might be able to use uranium to create weapons. They sent a letter to U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt and begged him to seriously consider this possibility.

              In 1939, Otto Hahn in Germany created the first confirmed example of nuclear fission. As the world drifted towards war, the United States started the top secret Manhattan Project to develop a bomb based on chain reactions of uranium. Enrico Fermi led a team to create the first nuclear reactor at the University of Chicago. In 1942, Fermi and his team achieved the first controlled nuclear reaction.

              Picture of a Depression Era glass vase colored with uranium taken by JJ Harrison ([email protected]):

     

  • Downwinders 4 – US Nuclear Test Fallout

              The main location for testing nuclear bombs in the United States between 1951 and 1962 was the Nevada Test Site. Eighty six nuclear bombs were exploded either at ground level or above and fourteen nuclear devices were exploded underground. Radioactive materials were injected into the atmosphere from all the tests. The government told people to sit outside and watch the mushroom clouds caused by the explosions. Many badges which registered radiation exposure were distributed and collect by the Atomic Energy Commission to study radiation levels near the explosions.

              A study by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) published in 1997 determined that these Nevada tests released large amounts of radioactive iodine-131 over a large are of the continental United States, especially in the early 1950s. The NCI study estimated that up to seventy five thousand additional cases of thyroid cancer may be caused by the radiation released in these tests. A report released by the Scientific Research Society suggests that over twenty thousand radiation caused cancers and two thousand deaths from leukemia will be caused by the Nevada tests and other causes of global radioactive fallout.

              The Nevada Test Site is covered with contaminated dust that is still poses a threat when moved by winds, storms or non-radioactive bomb tests. A proposed test of a seven hundred pound conventional bomb scheduled for 2007 was cancelled after public protest over the radioactive fallout that would result.

              In 1990, the United States passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (RECA) to provide monetary compensation for people who contracted cancer or a number of other specific diseases as a result of their exposure to nuclear fallout from U.S. nuclear tests. RECA provides for $50,000 for individuals who were working or residing downwind from nuclear tests. Workers who were actually involved in the nuclear tests are entitled to $75,000 compensation.

              The bill was amended in 2000 to include more geographic areas, additional categories of workers, lower levels of exposures and changes to the disease list. In order to qualify for compensation, there are a number of requirements including proof of location and duration of residence or work in a designated area. Medical records must be provided documenting the probable origin and progression of the disease. The requirement requirements are stringent and some individuals have had difficulty meeting them.

              The geographic area covered by the RECA with respect to downwinders includes “in Arizona – Apache, Coconino, Gila, Navajo, Yavapai;  In Nevada – Eureka, Lander, Lincoln, Nye, White Pine or the northern portion of Clark;  In Utah – Beaver, Garfield, Iron, Kane, Millard, Piute, San Juan, Sevier, Washington or Wayne.”

     

              The disease conditions covered by the RECA include “Primary cancers that are covered under this program: Bile ducts, Bladder, Brain, Breast(male and female), Colon/Rectal, Esophagus, Gall Bladder, Leukemia’s(other than CLL or chronic lymphocytic leukemia), Liver(except if there is evidence of cirrhosis or Hepatitis B), Lung, Multiple Myeloma, Nasal Pharynx, Lymphomas(other than Hodgkin’s disease), Ovary, Pancreas, Salivary Gland, Small Intestine, Stomach and Thyroid.”

                There are a number of websites set up to provide information on the RECA and to assist in recovering compensation under the act. These links are provided for the sole purpose of information and do not constitute a recommendation or an endorsement of the organizations or services provided.

             The National Cancer Benefits Center for Downwinders.

               Law offices of Laura J Taylor

               U.S. Department of Justice

                Yahoo Downwinders Forum

     

    Blue shaded area of the map is the geographic extent covered by the RECA:

  • Downwinders 3 – Hanford 2

    The following radioactive materials were released into the air by the Hanford facility between 1944 and 1972.

     

    Material:

    Half-Life:

    Iodine-131

    8 days

    Iodine-129

    16 million years

    Tritium (H-3)

    12 years

    Krypton-85

    11 years

    Strontium-89

    50 days

    Strontium-90

    29 years

    Ruthenium-103

    39 days

    Ruthenium-106

    370 days

    Tellurium-132

    78 hours

    Xenon-133

    5 days

    Cesium-137

    30 years

    Cerium-144

    284 days

    Plutonium-239

    24,000 years

     

     

              The following radioactive materials were released into the Columbia River by the Hanford facility between 1944 and 1971.

     

    Material:

    Half-Life:

    Iodine-131

    8 days

    Sodium-24

    15 hours

    Phosphorous-32

    14 days

    Chromium-51

    28 days

    Manganese-56

    2.5 hours

    Zinc-65

    245 days

    Gallium-72

    14 hours

    Arsenic-76

    26 hours

    Yttrium-90

    64 hours

    Neptunium-239

    2.4 days

     

     



     

              The following hazardous but non radioactive materials were discharged into the Columbia River.

     

    sodium dichromate

    sodium hydroxide

    aluminum sulfate

    sodium silicate

    bauxite

    ferric acid

    sulfuric acid

    hydrazine

    chlorine

    morpholine

    polyacrylamide

    ammonium hydroxide

     

     

    Since 1986 the government has releases millions of pages of information about the operation of the Hanford facility but there are billions of pages of information about nuclear weapons production that have not been released.

                                                                                           Source: www.downwinders.com

              In 1990, thousands of people who were exposed to radioactive materials as a result of Hanford operations filed suit against former contractors who operated the Hanford site for the United States government including DuPont and General Electric.

              All the Hanford Downwinder lawsuits were been consolidated into a single class action lawsuit called the In re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation. The trial began in March of 2005. Thirty people were selected to act as “bellweather” plaintiffs for the trial, fifteen by the prosecution and fifteen by the defendants. Their medical histories were examined in detail and out of this pool of thirty, twelve were selected. These people acted as representatives for the three thousand plaintiffs in order to simplify the proceedings.

              The jury found sufficient evidence for awards to three of the plaintiffs, another three cases were dismissed prior to the trial. The outcome of the trial was appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court.

              In 2007the Ninth Circuit Court upheld the awards to two of the plaintiffs. The Ninth Circuit Court generally upheld the actions of the lower court but did set a higher standard for deciding in favor of the plaintiffs which may limit the number of plaintiffs that will ultimately receive awards.

              In January 2010 the Court created  a trial track to test the radiation models being used by the plaintiffs to help achieve agreement between the defendants and plaintiff. The Court also created a mediation track to worked on settle a group of claims. The mediation track was split into two tracks. One track was focused on thirty two thyroid cancer claims file by one set of law firms. The other track was set up to work on another fourty claims randomly selected from suits filed by other law firms.

              In 2011, the mediation tracks were declared a failure and the cases being mediated were set to proceed to trial although some of the cases were resolved by mediation.

              In January of 2012, two trial tracks were established to adjudicate thyroid cancer and thyroid nodule claims. The original thyroid cancer trial track has been cancelled.

              The www.downwinders.com website has been established as a resource for Hanford Downwinders Litigation Information. Further information on the Hanford Downwinder lawsuits can be found on this site.

     

  • Downwinders 2 – Hanford 1

              The United States government began construction at Hanford in south central Washington State in 1943. Three nuclear reactors and two chemical processing plants were built and operated at Hanford during the Manhattan Project to develop nuclear weapons for use in World War II. The U.S. government retained private contractors including DuPont and General Electric to oversee the production of materials for nuclear weapons.

                Because of the war time pressure and inexperience with radioactive materials, the routine production of plutonium fuel for the reactors resulted in the release of large quantities of radioactive materials into the air, water and soil around the plants, including large amounts of iodine-131. Hanford did not install filters on the stacks of the plutonium processing plants until 1948. After 1948, Hanford continued to release radioactive materials and other hazardous chemicals into the air, soil and water including the Columbia River. By 1955, there were eight reactors in operation at Hanford. River water from the Columbia was used to cool these reactors and was contaminated with radioactivity, toxic chemicals and excessive heat.

                Over four billion gallons of contaminated liquids were released by Hanford operations. These releases contaminated over two hundred square miles of ground water under Hanford. In the 1960s Hanford began shutting down reactors and plants with the last plutonium plant and reactor being shut down in the late 1980s as a result of complaints by citizen action groups that the plants could not be operated safety without danger to the environment.

                In 1986, a release of millions of pages of Hanford documents by the U.S. Department of Energy revealed that over seventy five thousand square miles had been contaminated with radioactivity by Hanford’s operations. The Columbia River carried radioactivity as far as the Washington and Oregon coasts. Contaminated air from Hanford is thought to have traveled over Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Montana and parts of Canada.

                People who lived downwind from Hanford or who used water from the Columbia River downstream from Hanford were exposed to levels of radiation far above normal background levels from breathing contaminated air or consuming foods such as milk and cheese from cows and goats who grazed on contaminated vegetation. The contamination in the water of the Columbia River was concentrated in the fish and other aquatic life in the river. The waterfowl and other wildlife in the area which fed on the fish then became contaminated. The contaminated fish were especially injurious to the Native Americans who depend on the salmon in the Columbia River for their livelihood.

              Estimates of the number of people who may have had their health threatened by radioactivity released by Hanford over the past seventy years are as high as two million. The U.S. Department of Energy collaborated with the Hanford Health Information Network to educate the public on the dangers of radiation release from Hanford. Class action law suits have been working their way through the courts for years seeking compensations for health problems caused by Hanford radiation.

  • Downwinders 1 – Introduction

              The term “downwinders” refers to people, either individually or in communities, who have been exposed to radioactive materials as a result of nuclear fuel mining, nuclear weapons production and testing, nuclear waste disposal or nuclear accidents. The term derives from the fact that people who are downwind of an event that expels radioactive particles and gases into the atmosphere will be exposed to the fallout when the particles move through the air and fall to the ground. The common use of the term now includes radioactive contamination of ground water and the food chain as well as the atmosphere.

                Increased appearance of cancers, non-cancerous thyroid disease and congenital malformations have been documented in many communities that have been exposed to radioactive contamination from diverse sources. The Linear No-Threshold Model is used to estimated the exposure of individuals to radioactive contamination based on the amount of radiation and the length of exposure. Other demographic factors also have an impact on the way that radiation exposure affects the health of a particular community.

                Since 1945, there have been an estimated 2,000 nuclear devices exploded worldwide. The United States alone has exploded over 1,000 nuclear bombs. Up to 1980,  there were about 500 atmospheric nuclear tests conducted by the U.S, U.S.S.R. U.K., France and China with the U.S. accounting for over 300. Most of the U.S. tests took place in Nevada or the Pacific Proving Grounds in the Marshall Islands. However, tests have also been conducted in Alaska, Colorado, Mississippi and New Mexico.

              Nuclear explosions create the famous “mushroom cloud”. After the cloud reaches it maximum height, it begins to move downwind. Churning in the cloud spreads radioactive particles and gases throughout. Larger particles tend to settle near the site of the explosion while smaller particles and gases can be distributed across the world by the jet stream. Some clouds even reach the stratosphere and their radioactive materials may remain there for years until they finally fall to the ground.  While downwinder refers to someone near a nuclear event, in a very real sense, everyone in the world is downwind of nuclear fallout.

                Early in the Nuclear Age, the main concern about health risks of radioactive exposure centered on the fear that radiation would cause genetic damage and result in birth defects in the children of the people exposed. Subsequently it was found that the major risk was not genetic damage but damage to the health of the exposed people. Cancers that develop over the years following exposure are the main problem but there are also other types of tissue damage and illnesses resulting from radiation exposure.

                In 1963, many nuclear nations and other nations who did not yet have nuclear weapons signed the Limited Test Ban Treaty pledging to not test nuclear bombs in the atmosphere, underwater and in outer space.. The Soviet Union stopped testing in 1990, the U.K. stopped in 1991, the U.S. conducted its last underground test in 1992 and France and China stopped testing in 1996.  North Korea tested a nuclear device in 2009. In 1996, the United States and several other nuclear powers drew up the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) in 1996. The Treaty will come into effect after all signatory countries file ratification documentation with the United Nations. To date, the United. States Congress has not ratified the CTBT.

  • NGO Radiation Organizations 3 – International Commission on Radiological Protection

              Shortly after the discovery of X rays in 1895, papers began appearing in scientific publications about the negative effects of high levels of exposure to such radiation. In the first year, suggestions about how to protect against ionizing radiation were made including the three main measures that are still emphasized today, limit the exposure to the shortest possible time, maintain as great a distance from the source as possible and employ shielding of some sort.

              In 1925 the First International Congress of Radiology was held in London, England. The issue of the need for a committee to consider protection against radiation was raised at the conference and, during the Second Congress in 1928, the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) was launched. 

             The ICRP is an independent international organization dedicated to radiological protection. It is a Registered Charity in the United Kingdoms and has a Scientific Secretariat in Ottawa, Canada.

              Currently, the ICRP has more than two hundred volunteers for thirty countries including some of the leading scientists and policy makers in the field of radiological protection. It is funded by contributions from organization interested in the work of the Commission.

              The structure of the Commission includes a Main Commission, a Scientific Secretariat, and five standing committees on effects, doses, medicine, applications and the environment.

              “ICRP is an independent, international organization that advances for the public benefit the science of radiological protection, in particular by providing recommendations and guidance on all aspects of protection against ionizing radiation. Since 1928, ICRP has developed, maintained, and elaborated the International System of Radiological Protection (ISRP) used world-wide as the common basis for radiological protection standards, legislation, guidelines, programs, and practice.

              The ISRP was developed based on the current scientific understanding of the biological effects of radiation exposure. In addition to the scientific aspects of the ISRP, the ICRP also takes into account ethical concerns, social expectations and knowledge gained in implementing the system.

               The ICRP regularly carries out consultation programs dealing with radiological exposure issues. Past projects included assessing radiation exposure and effects on astronauts, workers, cardiology patients and practitioners, patients being imaged, children being diagnosed and treated and people accidently exposed in radiotherapy. They also consulted on transfer of radionuclides from plants and animals, dangers of radon gas exposure, and potential problems with long term geological disposal of nuclear wastes.   

              The ICRP has published over a hundred documents on a wide range subjects concerning radiation protection including the reports generated by the consultation projects mentioned above. They also publish the documents that spell out their radiological protection system. They publish an annual report which is available online. Visitors to the website can download an extract from the 2007 Summary Recommendations, free posters for Pediatric radiology, free guides and explanatory notes, free education downloads and free educational CDs.

              In 2011 the ICRP held its First Symposium on the International System of Radiological Protection. The program and abstracts of the presented papers can be downloaded from the website. The Second Symposium will be held in 2013.

  • NGO Radiation Organizations 2 – International Radiation Protection Association

               After the Second World War, weapons research and work on civilian use of nuclear power were producing more and more radioactive materials. Scientists in the Manhattan Project had been assigned to work on what was then called “Health Physics.” A decade after the end of the war, the first conference on Health Physics was held at Ohio State University. One result of the conference was the formation of a professional Health Physics Society (HPS).

              Around 1960 with over a 1000 members, the Society formed “Sections” so each country with members in the HPS could have their own sub organization. In the mid 60s, a committee was formed within the HPS to work on the creation of a new international health physics association. Eventually, the committee was expanded to include 45 representatives from 25 countries. Articles of agreement were drafted, circulated and approved by the HPS. In 1965 the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) was formally launched with fifteen of the country subgroups participating. Over 1000 members were part of the new organization.  Currently there are 48 member societies on 5 continents. 37 of these member organizations have their own websites.

             “The primary purpose of IRPA is to provide a medium whereby those engaged in radiation protection activities in all countries may communicate more readily with each other and through this process advance radiation protection in many parts of the world. This includes relevant aspects of such branches of knowledge as science, medicine, engineering, technology and law, to provide for the protection of man and his environment from the hazards caused by radiation, and thereby to facilitate the safe use of medical, scientific, and industrial radiological practices for the benefit of mankind.”

              The first IRPA Congress was held in 1966 and IRPA congresses have been every 4 years since then. The Congresses cover wide ranges of topics and virtually any paper dealing with aspects of radiation protection is welcome. The Congresses are held all over the world and regional congresses are also sponsored.

              The IRPA publishes the proceedings of their conferences on their website. They have a large library of other documents available online on a host of radiation related topics. Of special note is a set of documents about a “radiation protection culture.”  These documents deal with how to go about creating a framework of behaviour in an organization that supports radiation protection. They also archive documents for other international organizations.

                The IRPA has an education program that assists in training radiation protection professionals to qualify as “Radiation Protection Experts (RPE).” This profession is listed in the International Standard Classification of Occupations which catalogs the areas of expertise associated with this profession. The IRPA is currently developing a certification process for RPEs.

                The IRPA website lists 5 governmental radiation organizations, 4 NGOs concerned with radiation, and 4 professional organizations with which the IRPA has links. There is a page of links for radiation protection related websites.

                The IRPA website is an excellent source of information for anyone concerned with radiation protection, especially anyone working in a related field.

  • NGO Radiation Organizations 1 – Radiation and Public Health Project

               In 1988 the Radiation and Public Health Project (RPHP) was created by the United Church of Christ Commission for Racial Justice. Jay M. Gould and Benjamin A Goldman started the project as a spinoff of their work at Public Data Access, Inc. In 1995 RPHP became an independent non-profit 501(c)3 organization. The mission of the organization includes research, education and raising public awareness.

               RPHP research is focused on ”studying the links between low-level radiation and world-wide increases in diseases, especially cancer and those affecting the newborn and children  and to become the leading, world-wide source of information on radiation and public health issues.”

               The RPHP education efforts  “publishing the results of research dealing with the impact of low-level radiation on public health and disseminating this information to the public, media, policy makers and the scientific community. They have a section of their website where people can order from a dozen books and 10 monographs dealing with radiation related health issues. The RPHP published a newsletter between 1998 and 2010 which is available online. There is also a page on the website with a number articles on radiation issues from various sources.

               RPHP also works to increase public awareness bypromoting public awareness and responsible public policy related to radiation and public health, in the areas of freedom of information…objective medical and scientific investigation… institutional accountability…independent oversight…and responsible public health and environmental policy.” Their testing of nearly 5000 children’s teeth for strontium-90 showed a 50% rise in average levels with the highest levels near nuclear power plants . Tests of teeth from young cancer victims show higher Sr-90 that in health children. Similar tests are being carried out on teeth of Baby Boomers

               For fifty years there has been an increasing body of evidence that indicates a probable link between the ingestion of man-made low level radiation fission products and an increase in world-wide immune deficiency diseases such as cancer, especially affecting the newborn. RPHP has been collecting epidemiological evidence of this trend.

               The RPHP has published five books that summarize hundreds of publish peer reviewed articles dealing with the health impacts of man-made fission products during the Nuclear age. There is strong evidence that the very young have been adversely impacted by such fission products from infant mortality and low birth weight from published vital statistics especially during the atmospheric nuclear tests during the 50s and 60s.

               The RPHP has also traced damage to hormonal and immune systems on a decade by decade basis in the Baby Boomers born between 1945 and 1965. They have shown epidemic increases in infant cancer between the ages of 5 and 9 in children born in the 1950s.

               There was a 20 year decline in Scholastic Aptitude Test scores that began in 1963. The RPHP points out that 1963 is the year that children born in 1945, the first year of nuclear detonations and fallout, reached 18 and took the test. The test scores rose again after all children born during the 20 years of atmospheric tests passed the age of 18.

               The RPHP suggests that the civilian nuclear reactors that began coming on line came in the 1970s and released radioactive materials during normal operation and accidents may have caused an increase in immunodeficiency diseases including AID and early breast cancer. RPHP research has also shown a clear correlation between breast and prostate cancer mortality rates and proximity to nuclear power plants across the United States.

  • Public Radiation Monitoring 9 – Safecast

                Following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in March 11, 2011, a group of friends in the United States and Japan started a dialog to discuss what they could to help the friends and family in Japan. Since monitoring for radioactivity was very important following the disaster, the availability of Geiger counters was a critical issue. Seeing that conventional sources of Geiger counters sold out quickly after the disaster, the conversation turned to the possibility of building and distributing Geiger counter. People who had expertise in particular relevant areas were invited to join the conversation.

                Work began to aggregate and display radiation readings on an online map. As readings began to come in and were added to the map, areas with no readings were noted and it became a priority to get Geiger counters into those areas.

                An annual event in Japan for hardware hobbyists was converted into a conference on responses to the nuclear disaster following the Fukushima earthquake and tsunami. Some of the people working on the project met for the first time at the conference on April 1, 2012. One outcome of the conference was the design of a new Geiger counter which would come to be called bGeigi. It would incorporate a GPS which would allow it to be moved around to take radiation readings. It was decided that a organization would be created to focus on aggregating and displaying radiation data. The name Safecast was chosen for this new organization.

                Safecast proceeded to obtain funding from Kickstarter and private individuals. Hundreds of volunteers were recruited and Safecast became the organization to publish more information on radiation levels in Japan than any other institution.

                The main Geiger counter designed by Safecast and manufactured by International Medcom is called the Inspector Alert (IA). It is based around a 2” diameter pancake Geiger-Müller tube. This tube has excellent sensitivity for alpha, beta and gamma radiation. The IA is handheld and easy to use with a digital display. The units cost $700 each and forty have been built and deployed.

                The CRM 100 has a design similar to the IA but it employs a smaller and cheaper Geiger-Müller tube called the LND 712. It is smaller, cheaper, less sensitive and takes a little longer to register than the 2” tube in the IA. It is the device primarily distributed to volunteers who want to take individual readings around their homes and neighborhoods. It costs $450 and thirty units have been built and deployed.

                The bGeigie is basically a IA combined with a GPS and electronics which takes a reading every five seconds with a GPS tag and stores it to an SD care. The bGeigie is placed in a weatherproof box and attached to a car so it can be moved around and automatically take readings over a wide area. Wifi has been added to the most recent design to allow readings to be uploaded in real time. It costs $1000 and twenty five have been built and distributed.

                The nGeigie has the 2” Geiger-Müller tube and is intended to be set up at a fixed location to take repeated readings. Wifi and wireless versions will be available as installation requirements dictate. Safecast is establishing a fixed sensor network based on the nGeigie. It costs $500 and twenty have been built and distributed.

                The iGeigie is a design concept that is intended to work with a mobile device such as an iPhone. It is still in the prototype stage. When manufactured, it will cost $200.

                The Safecast map displays over two million data points, primarily over Japan. There is a Fusion map that has been created which uses Google Fusion table to display data on Google maps. An Interpolation map has been create which attempts to uses shading to filling in the estimated radiation between collection points. An Aggregate Feed map combines and displays radiation data from the Japanese government, several non-governmental organization as well as Safecast submissions. Safecast Drive maps display individual maps for each measurement drive by a Safecast volunteer. Yahoo! Japan has built a Yahoo map that shows data from fixed location Safecast sensors. In addition to these maps, Yahoo also uses the same data as the Yahoo map to show graphs of radiation.

    Safecast map: