The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for December 25, 2023

    Geiger Readings for December 25, 2023

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 76 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for December 24, 2023

    Geiger Readings for December 24, 2023

    Ambient office = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 136 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for December 23, 2023

    Geiger Readings for December 23, 2023

    Ambient office = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 115 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 922 – IAEA Removes Disused Sealed Radioactive Sources From Chile

    Radioactive Waste 922 – IAEA Removes Disused Sealed Radioactive Sources From Chile

         Thirty-one disused sealed radioactive sources (DSRSs) have been transported from Chile to a recycling facility in Europe as part of an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) multi-regional project to improve nuclear security and radiation safety.
         Most radioactive waste generated by nuclear applications consists of DSRS. Radioactive materials are used in different devices in medical, industrial, and agricultural facilities. They have to be carefully accounted for. When they are no longer usable, they have to be recovered, stored and, in some cases, prepared for transportation. The DSRSs recovered from Chile have been in temporary storage since the end of their use in 1992. They are mostly cobalt sources used in cancer treatment.
         The IAEA said that the recovered DSRs “represent about half of the radioactive material received yearly in waste management facilities from different activities around the country.”
         Luis Huerta Torchio is the director of the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN). He said, “The removal of these sources has multiple benefits for the CCHEN and the whole country, and it is in line with the circular economy objectives, in terms of recycling and reuse. The removal has significantly reduced the risk for any type of incident associated with these disused sources. In addition, it freed up to 30 per cent of space in the national storage facility used for disused radioactive sources, and subsequently extended the possibility of its use for about ten more years.”
         Olena Mykolaichuk is the director of the IAEA’s Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology division. She said, “The IAEA technically oversaw the removal of the sources from Chile to ensure that it was performed safely and securely. An operation of this scale cannot succeed without the dedicated efforts of organisations like CCHEN, skilled contractors, and the regulatory bodies involved – the experience gained is invaluable and represents a model that can be applied for future projects in other countries.”
         The three-year IAEA Multi-Regional Project on Sustainable Management of Disused Sealed Radioactive Sources began in 2019 funded by Canad. Eleven Latin American, African and Pacific countries were included in the first phase of the IAEA project.
         Hildegarde Vandenhove is the director of the IAEA’s Division of Radiation, Transport and Waste Safety. She said, “The increase in the number of participating countries indicates the success of the first phase of the project, the global interest in the safe and secure handling of DSRSs and, at the same time, the amount of work that remains to be done in this field.”
         The operational plan for Chile was agreed upon in December of 2021. It involved the verification of the radioactive sources, appropriate packaging for safe transportation, and shipment to the recycling facility. The first of seventeen DSRs were exported in October of 2022. Fourteen more were sent in July of this year.
         Most discussion of and funding for dealing with radioactive waste is focused on the spent nuclear fuel rods from operating nuclear reactors. However, there are also many radioactive materials from other sources that must be dealt with.

  • Geiger Readings for December 22, 2023

    Geiger Readings for December 22, 2023

    Ambient office = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 143 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 151 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1329 – Challenges Of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1329 – Challenges Of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Globally, decommissioning costs for nuclear power plants range from one billion to one and a half billion dollars per one gigawatt plant. The cost of dismantling nuclear facilities associated with the fuel cycle, research reactors, and nuclear laboratories also needs consideration.
         Furthermore, environmental challenges emerge when it is planned to either restore decommissioned nuclear sites to their original state or prepare them for future use. There is a considerable risk of the release of harmful nuclear materials and other pollutants in the event of any minor accidents. The ecological response must be assessed carefully and balanced with the imperative to maintain the site’s functionality and manage risk. These risks include the possibility of catastrophic collapse.
         Recently there has been a great deal of progress on robotic technologies and artificial intelligence. Experts are increasingly focused on extending the autonomous operations of robots into more intricate yet harsh environments. There was a recent article in the journal Robotics that discussed special robots which are now being developed to perform complex tasks during nuclear decommissioning.
         Handling objects in nuclear environments poses two primary challenges. One is dealing with unknown objects and ensuring their safe manipulation without breaking or dropping them. Haptic intelligence and leveraging tactile sense in contemporary robotics have enhanced the safety of grasping before and during object manipulation.
         Recently, a novel approach employing fiber-optic tactile sensors for detecting surface cracks has been developed. This technique offers distinct advantages, designed with nuclear decommissioning in mind. It is intended for use with remotely operated robots. Fiber optics is advantageous because it is not affected by gamma radiation. This provides a potential alternative to electrical cables for nuclear power plant applications.
         C-Tech is a company registered in the U.K. It has been carrying out research studies for the past ten years to develop an innovative electrochemical nuclear decontamination system that is much less expensive the current methods.
         The first technological innovation announced by the company was its advanced electrolytically assisted surface decontamination (EASD) system. This technology offers controlled, rapid, and cost-effective methods for dissolving surfaces with the use of nitric acid as the medium.
         This technology facilitates the removal of radioactivity from contaminated metal by leveraging accelerated electrolytic dissolution of the contaminated metal surface. The resulting radioactive dissolved metal is transferred into the nitric acid effluent. The result of this technique is processed downstream using conventional methods.
         Electrochemical Nuclear Decontamination (ELENDES) technology is poised to revolutionize the removal of contaminated organic matter from the aqueous effluent before downstream processing.
         ELENDES consists of electrochemically oxidating insoluble organic waste materials at nuclear sites. This effectively eliminates the organic matter that contains radioactive content from the waste material. This advanced electrochemical nuclear decontamination solution provides a safe and efficient means of removing contaminated organic from nuclear waste.
         Several challenges still face the process of nuclear decommissioning. The complex planning and safe execution of this process is a major hurdle. The recent technological advancements in robotics and industrial equipment ensure that nuclear decommissioning will become safer and less expensive as time progresses.