Centrus Energy Corp. (formerly USEC Inc.) is an American company that supplies nuclear fuel for use in nuclear power plants and works to develop and deploy advanced centrifuge technology to produce enriched uranium for commercial and government uses, including for national security. The American Centrifuge Plant (ACP) in Piketon, Ohio, was constructed by Centrus on the same site as other Centrus facilities. Contracts for delivery of high-assay, low-enriched (HALEU) were signed with the U.S. Department of Energy.
The ACP has made its first delivery of HALEU to the DoE. This marks the end of the first phase of a cost-share contract that was signed in 2022. The ACP is the first new U.S.-owned uranium enrichment plant using U.S. technology to begin production since 1954. The plant began enrichment operations in October.
HALEU is uranium enriched between five percent and twenty percent uranium-235. It will be used in the advanced nuclear fuel required for most of the next generation reactor designs that are currently under development. Nine advanced reactor designs have been approved under the Energy Department’s Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program. The DoE has been supporting activities to ensure the availability of the material for those reactors when needed. They also are assisting in the development of a domestic HALEU supply chain.
Daniel Poneman is the President and CEO of Centrus which owns the ACP. He said, “Centrus is proud to be pioneering American HALEU production, with our first delivery of the fuel that is urgently needed to support the demonstration and commercialization of advanced reactors. This critical milestone is essential to meeting the Department’s near-term HALEU needs, while laying the groundwork for the full restoration of America’s lost domestic uranium enrichment capacity.”
Construction of the sixteen-centrifuge demonstration cascade plant began in 2019. This work was carried out under a contract with the DoE. The two-phase contract awarded to Centrus last year included cost-shared funding to finish the cascade, complete final regulatory steps, and begin operating the cascade. The goal was to produce up to forty-four pounds of HALEU by the end of this year. The first phase of the contract called for Centrus and the DoE to each contribute about thirty million dollars to the overall cost of sixty million dollars.
The delivery by Centrus of more than forty-four pounds of HALEU to the DoE means that phase one of the contract has now been completed. Centrus can now move ahead with the second phase which consists of a full year of HALEU production which will produce one thousand nine hundred and eighty-four pounds of nuclear fuel.
Centrus says that with sufficient funding and offtake commitments, it could expand production. A full-scale cascade of one hundred and twenty centrifuges could be constructed in forty-two months following the securing of funding. It should be able to produce about thirteen thousand two hundred pounds of HALEU per year. More cascades of centrifuges could be added after that. Centrus says that construction and operation of such a plant would support thousands of direct and indirect jobs across a nationwide manufacturing supply chain.
Blog
-
Nuclear Reactors 1304 – Centrus Is Producing HALEU Fuel For The Department Of Energy
-
Nuclear News Roundup November 09, 2023
Uranium prices top $80 for the first time in 15 years as demand for nuclear power surges markets.businessinsider.com
U.S. military quietly revokes planned contract for small nuclear plant at Alaska Air Force base alaskabeacon.com
The challenge for Israel: Prevail against Hamas while preventing an Iranian nuclear breakout jpost.com
-
Geiger Readings for November 09, 2023
Ambient office = 99 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 67 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 65 nanosieverts per hour
Mini cuke from Central Market = 110 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 71 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 62 nanosieverts per hour
-
Nuclear Reactors 1303 – A Consortium of Companies Is Working On A Demonstration Lead-Cooled Reactor In Belgium
Five companies from Belgium, Italy, Romania and the U.S. have signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) to collaborate on the development and commercialization of lead-cooled small modular reactors (SMRs). The MoU is between Belgium’s SCK-CEN nuclear research center, ENEA (the Italian National Agency For New Technologies, Energy And Sustainable Economic Development), Italy’s Ansaldo Nucleare, Romania’s Regia Autonoma Tehnologii pentru Energia Nucleara (RATEN) and Westinghouse Electric Company of the U.S.
The MoU was signed in Brussels in the presence of the Alexander De Croo, Belgium’s Prime Minister, Klaus Iohannis, Romania’s President and representatives from the Italian and US embassies in Belgium.
SCK-CEN said, “With their combined efforts and shared drive to implement a cost-competitive energy-generating solution, the partners will nurture this promising technology, facilitating the commercial-scale deployment of sustainable nuclear energy,” SCK-CEN said, “The newly formed collaboration has outlined a clear vision, based on a step-wise approach to demonstration. Beginning with a small-size reactor to demonstrate the technological and engineering aspects of the commercial SMR-LFR in Mol, Belgium. The Lead-cooled Fast Reactor design developed by Westinghouse will be the starting point for this project ultimately targeting its global commercialization.”
The consortium will work towards the next development phase, which is the construction of the Advanced Lead-cooled Fast Reactor European Demonstrator (ALFRED) in Pitești, Romania. It will focus on the technical and economic feasibility of future commercial SMRs. The partners will leverage and expand on the work done over the past ten years by Ansaldo Nucleare, ENEA and RATEN under the Fostering ALFRED Construction (FALCON) consortium toward this objective.
A three-hundred-megawatt demonstration ALFRED reactor is being constructed at RATEN-ICN’s facility in Mioveni, near Pitesti. At that location, a fuel manufacturing plant is in operation for the country’s two operating Candu reactors. ALFRED is considered to be a prelude to an industrial demonstration reactor of about three hundred to four hundred megawatts. The lead-cooled reactor will employ mixed-oxide fuel. It will operate at temperatures around five hundred and fifty and will include passive safety systems. The total cost of the project is put at some one billion one hundred million dollars.
The design of the ALRED reactor and the integrated project were led by Ansaldo Nucleare under the seventh Euratom framework program. ENEA performed the core design, technological development and safety analyses involving numerical and experimental approaches.
SCK-CEN said, “Thanks to the Myrrha (Multipurpose Hybrid Research Reactor for High-tech Applications accelerator-driven research reactor) project, SCK-CEN is a global leader in lead-bismuth research, and it will merge its acquired knowledge with RATEN’s extensive expertise in lead and ENEA’s widespread experience in lead technology development. Westinghouse Electric Company and Ansaldo Nucleare will bring extensive experience in design, licensing, construction and commercialization of nuclear power plants globally.”
Prime Minister De Croo said, “A year and a half ago, we took the strategic decision to accelerate our energy transition. Reducing our dependence on fossil fuels, limiting our gas emissions and our dependence on countries like Russia, by investing massively in offshore energy, hydrogen infrastructure, but also the nuclear power of the future. We have decided to do this by drawing on the expertise developed in Belgium, and by allocating EUR100 million to the research and development of SMRs. From the beginning, we are convinced that this would be set up in cooperation with international partners. The agreement SCK-CEN has just signed today with Ansaldo Nucleare, ENEA, RATEN and Westinghouse is the first visible milestone in this strategy, a solid foundation on which we will continue to build.” -
Nuclear News Roundup November 08, 2023
Hacktivists breach U.S. nuclear research lab, steal employee data bleepingcomputer.com
China / Construction Begins Of Xudabu-1 CAP1000 Nuclear Power Plant nucnet.org
Addressing challenges of chemical processes and technologies in molten salt reactor fuel cycles oecd-nea.org
3rd release of treated water from Japan’s damaged Fukushima nuclear plant ends safely, operator says apnews.com
-
Geiger Readings for November 08, 2023
Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 98 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Avocado from Central Market = 88 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 93 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 82 nanosieverts per hour
-
Nuclear Reactors 1302 – NRC Answered Questions About Pilot Natrium Project From Citizens In The Kemmerer, Wyoming Area – Part 2 of 2 Parts
Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
Typically, the complex and difficult NRC review can take seven years or more to complete. There is no guarantee that the project in question will receive final approval. Last year, the NRC denied Oklo Power, LLC’s application to construct a “fast reactor” in Idaho for allegedly failing to supply sufficient information on the facility’s design.
TerraPower is embarking on its first NRC licensing attempt. It hopes to win approval much sooner, however, thanks in part to the 2019 Nuclear Energy Innovation and Modernization Act. The law was championed by Senator John Barrasso (R-Wyoming). It set a maximum review timeline of thirty-six months. Additionally, TerraPower expects to assist the NRC to trim that timeline even further by filing information ahead of schedule.
The process all depends on TerraPower submitting thorough information that does not require many requests to get answers to ignored questions, according to the NRC.
Jessup said, “If we have all of these discussions and address all of these topics before the application even comes in, then you would expect that it may make the review go faster.”
Many locals are eager for the potential economic boon the four-billion-dollar project might bring to this region. Its economy has long relied on the diminishing coal industry to power the economy. However, many of the same people, and others, are concerned about the high-stakes risks that come with the nuclear facility.
With respect to the question about checking for seismic activity, the NRC said that they are aware that there is seismic activity in the Rock Mountain Region.
Several residents, including Representative Scott Heiner (R-Green River), asked when the spent nuclear fuel might be transported to a permanent storage facility. Heiner asked, “Is there a permanent solution for waste that is being worked on at this time?”
The NRC responded that there is no permanent nuclear fuel waste repository in the U.S. at this time. Although, the NRC staff in attendance indicated that they “anticipate” one will be constructed, others have long indicated that there is no clear path to the construction of a permanent repository. Such a repository has been discussed for decades.
The U.S. government passed the Nuclear Waste Policy amendments in 1987 promising a spent nuclear fuel repository. In 2002, Congress approved an old salt mine under Yucca Mountain in Nevada as the site for the repository in 2002. Millions were spent preparing the site until politics resulted in the cancelation of the project in 2011. There will not be such a repository in the U.S. before 2050 at the earliest. For the present, that means that spent nuclear fuel will be “temporarily” stored on site.
The NRC also took questions about how nuclear fuel will be transported to the facility and how the safety of those radioactive materials will be ensured. The NRC, along with several other federal agencies, closely manages the transportation of such radioactive materials in cooperation with state agencies, according to NRC staff. A specific plan will be worked out in the NRC’s review.
NRC representatives also reassured locals that they will maintain partnerships with the local emergency managers and state environmental authorities. -
Nuclear News Roundup November 07 2023
West Virginia lawmakers hear advance nuclear reactor updates wvnews.com
South Korea, Britain vow closer ties in nuclear energy sector en.yna.co.kr
River Bend nuclear power plant shut down temporarily after feedwater issue wbrz.com
Why Milwaukee is seeking insurance against nuclear weapons for Republican National Convention Jsonline.com
-
Geiger Readings for November 07, 2023
Ambient office = 84 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 128 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 131 nanosieverts per hour
Serano pepper from Central Market = 102 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 117 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 106 nanosieverts per hour
-
Nuclear Reactors 1301 – NRC Answered Questions About Pilot Natrium Project From Citizens In The Kemmerer, Wyoming Area – Part 1 of 2 Parts
Part 1 of 2 Parts
TerraPower is backed by Bill Gates and the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE). It plans to construct the pilot “Natrium” liquid-sodium-cooled nuclear energy plant in Kemerer, Wyoming. TerraPower hopes that its success will spur the deployment of Natrium and other small nuclear reactors (SMRs) around the world.
The next-generation nuclear technology presents a variety of considerations for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It would also be the first industrial nuclear facility in Wyoming. The local people have many questions including whether or not the NRC takes seismic activity into account, when the spent nuclear fuel be shipped to a permanent storage facility and, will there be regular NRC inspections.
Senator Dan Dockstader (R-Afton), however, shares another concern that is front and center for locals who are eager for the economic boost that developers promised: Can the NRC accelerate the approval process “if you get the right people into place?” He said, “I’m running out of time planning and creating legislation to make sure this all comes together.”
Dockstader was among more than one hundred local residents who came to the NRC’s two information in Kemmerer recently. The NRC sent a dozen staff member to this isolated southwestern Wyoming town of two thousand four hundred to take questions about what many anticipate will be an expedited review process.
TerraPower and its contractors have already drilled more than a hundred boreholes in Kemmerer to help “investigate” the suitability of the chosen location, according to the company. It plans to begin building the sodium testing facility and other non-nuclear portions of the three hundred forty-five megawatt Natrium nuclear reactor plant in 2024.
The new commercial nuclear power plant will be “co-located” next to PacifiCorp’s Naughton power plant just outside Kemmerer. One coal-burning furnace at the plant was converted to nuclear gas. The two remaining coal-burning units will be converted to natural gas in 2026.
Before TerraPower can start assembling the nuclear components, however, it must complete a licensing application that can pass the NRC’s review process. There will be several opportunities for the public to weigh in on the proposal. The NRC expects to receive TerraPower’s application and begin the official process in March.
William Jessup is NRC’s Chief of Advanced Reactor Licensing. He said, “Now is an opportune time to conduct this initial outreach and to explain the analysis process of reviewing applications for construction and operation.”
Natrium uses molten sodium as a coolant instead of water. Although the NRC is developing a new review process specific to “advanced” reactors such as Natrium, TerraPower has tentatively agreed to seek approval via the long existing “Part Fifty” review. It includes multiple review tracks, each with safety and environmental components. One review considers a construction permit. A second review considers an operating license. The process requires the NRC to produce an environmental impact statement. All of the reviews include public input and multiple opportunities for the normal administrative and legal challenges that come with bit federal permitting activities.
Please read Part 2 next