The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1471 – Australian Political Parties Disagree About The Need For Nuclear Power – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1471 – Australian Political Parties Disagree About The Need For Nuclear Power – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         Nuclear’s share as part of the global energy mix has been falling for the past few decades, and incidents like the Fukushima disaster in 2011 highlighted for many the risks of the technology. Some countries started mothballing or shutting down nuclear power plants, and many new projects have been plagued by cost overruns and construction delays. However, in the past few years there has been a remarkable turnaround.
         Countries are pledging to triple the production of nuclear power globally. Industry advocates are a growing presence at global climate summits. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is a United Nations body that advocates for peaceful use of nuclear technology. It is forecasting substantial growth in the nuclear power sector over the coming decades.
         Australia is heading into a federal election with the adoption of nuclear power at the center of the political contest. The Liberal-National Coalition (LNP) argues that Australia risks being left behind if it doesn’t get on board with nuclear power.
         Others point out that while there is plenty of global interest in nuclear power and the as-yet unrealized promise of new technology such as small modular reactors (SMRs), there is a lot more money flowing into renewable energy sources, which are already transforming global energy grids.
         The U.N. Climate Change Conference (COP29) climate summit held in Baku, Azerbaijan late last year was dedicated to climate financing. It was focused on finding the money needed to fund a massive global effort to tackle climate change.
         COP29 made headlines for a few different reasons. One reason was that for the second year running, the global climate summit was being held in a country that derives most of its income from oil and gas. Last year’s climate summit was held in the UAE.
         Another reason was the growing presence of nuclear power. Six more countries have signed a pledge to triple nuclear’s global production by 2050, taking the total number of countries on board to thirty-one.
         These countries range from relatively small countries such as Moldova, to major Australian allies like Canada, Japan, the UK and US. All four of those larger countries have long-established nuclear power industries.
         Nuclear power attracted plenty of attention at COP29, including headlines labelling it a “rising star” at the climate summit.
         David Gillespie is the retiring Nationalist Party (NP) MP for the NSW North Coast seat of Lyne. He travelled to the summit (with some backing from Coalition-aligned environment group Coalition for Conservation). Gillespie has been one of nuclear power’s longest and loudest supporters in Australia, chairing the “parliamentary friends of nuclear industries”. He acknowledges that a large part of COP29 was devoted to renewable energy, and a lot of money and ambition is flowing into solar and wind. However, he said that the shift in thinking on nuclear power at a global scale was clear to see.
         Gillespie said, “The world — and climate summits — for the first twenty-five years ignored nuclear. People have worked out, they realize for us to reduce our world’s requirement for fossil fuels, for industry, for running cities, for running sovereign energy systems that are not weather dependent — the way to go is nuclear. You build a fleet (of power plants), you don’t tip your toe around the edges.” He said the message he took from the climate summit was go nuclear, and go big. You do what France, and what Canada, and what America did in the 80s, you build a lot of them. And then you’ve got a grid that’s resilient and clean.”

    COP29

    Please read Part 2 next
  • Geiger Readings for Jan 28, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 28, 2025

    Ambient office = 81 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Polenta from Central Market = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1470 – Chinese DeepSeek Chatbot Roils Stock Market For Chip Makers And Nuclear Industry

    Nuclear Reactors 1470 – Chinese DeepSeek Chatbot Roils Stock Market For Chip Makers And Nuclear Industry

         S&P 500 nuclear power giants Constellation Energy (CEG) and Vistra (VST) stock plummeted Monday as China’s private DeepSeek startup shook the global markets. DeepSeek has just released a powerful artificial intelligence program that it claims costs just five billion six hundred million dollars to build. This marks a possible paradigm shift from the current massive levels of investment by technology industry giants in energy and AI infrastructure.
         Nuclear stocks fell Monday during market action, marking a reverse of fortunes compared to last week. The sector had advanced after President Trump announced Tuesday afternoon that Sam Altman’s OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle (ORCL) are planning a joint venture called Stargate. This collaboration is intended to build data centers and other AI infrastructure in the U.S., with investments of up to five hundred billion dollars.
         Data centers are needed to “train” AI learning models. They are expected to increase demand for electricity through the coming decade. Big Tech companies have looked to nuclear power, as well as natural gas, to answer the demand surge. However, the concern about China’s DeepSeek is that the massive investment is not necessarily needed for a capable AI model.

         S&P 500 companies CEG and VST sank twenty two percent and twenty eight percent respectively on Monday. These nuclear giants, who were two of the top three S&P 500 performers in January going into Monday’s trade, had jumped more than nine percent last week. CEG and VST began Monday trade extended above traditional buy points, according to MarketSurge chart analysis.
         Along with CEG and VST, Talen Energy (TLN) sank twenty-two percent. Talen Energy signed a six hundred and fifty million dollars deal last March with Amazon.com (AMZN) for a nuclear-powered data center campus.
         Meanwhile, small modular reactor (SMR) focused companies signaled significant declines after huge gains last week. The nuclear industry segment so far has offered no operational advanced nuclear projects. However, several companies are moving ahead with SMR technology.
         Oklo (OKLO) is the nuclear power startup backed by Sam Altman from OpenAI. It slid twenty-six percent on Monday. OKLO stock soared sixty percent last week, surging past a traditional twenty-eight buy point, the high from October 30th, from a nine-week cup base. The stock began Monday up nearly ninety percent in January. However, the OKLO stock is very volatile and has swung above and below that twenty-eight entry in broad moves.

         Fellow SMR-focused stock Nano Nuclear Energy (NNE) dropped twenty six percent on Monday after an eighty percent advance last week. NuScale Power (SMR) dipped twenty eight percent on Monday. That stock booked a twenty-seven percent gain last week.
         GE Vernova (GEV) has been experiencing demand for its natural gas turbines for data centers. It declined around twenty-two percent on Monday.
         Meanwhile, Entergy (ETR), one of the largest U.S. utilities, dipped four and a half percent on Monday. Last December, Entergy was chosen by Meta Platforms (META) to help power its planned ten-billion-dollar AI data center in northeast Louisiana.
         AI data center-adjacent stocks also dropped on Monday. Powell Industries (POWL) fell sixteen percent while Modine Manufacturing (MOD) declined twenty six percent. Comfort Systems USA (FIX) sank twenty-five percent and Vertiv Holdings (VRT) fell around thirty percent.
         Constellation Energy stock has a ninety-four Composite Rating out of a best-possible ninety-nine. The S&P 500 stock also has a ninety-seven Relative Strength Rating and a fifty-four EPS Rating.

    DeepSeek

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 27, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 27, 2025

    Ambient office = 79 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    Russett potato from Central Market = 134 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 121 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 26, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 26, 2025

    Ambient office = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 121 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 131 nanosieverts per hour

    Garlic bulb from Central Market = 135 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 25, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 25, 2025

    Ambient office = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 130 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 130 nanosieverts per hour

    Green onion from Central Market = 137 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 68 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 93 nanosieverts per hour