The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Links for 21 Sept 2023

    Greenpeace warns over safety of Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant theguardian.com

    Argentina and France extend nuclear collaboration world-nuclear-news.org

    Japan to release second batch of wastewater from Fukushima nuclear plant next week theguardian.com

    Iran can produce fissile material for nuclear bomb within 2 weeks – US jpost.com

     

         Allerdale is one of four locations in the U.K. that were being evaluated for siting a geological disposal repository for spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste. It has just been announced by Nuclear Waste Services (NWS) that Allerdale has been removed from the list of possible sites because of limited suitable geology. It is expected that a final site selection could be a process that requires ten to fifteen years to complete.
         A geological disposal facility (GDF) contains a network of highly-engineered underground vaults and tunnels built to permanently dispose of highly radioactive waste so that no harmful levels of radiation ever reach the surface environment. Countries including Finland, Sweden, France, Canada and the U.S. are also pursuing this option.
         Four localities formed Community Partnerships interested in hosting the GDF. These included Allerdale, South Copeland and Mid Copeland in Cumbria in northwest England, and Theddlethorpe in Lincolnshire, in eastern England. The Allerdale GDF Community Partnership was the third such partnership to form, in January 2022. It followed Mid Copeland GDF Community Partnership and South Copeland GDF Community Partnership which were formed in late-202. The final partnership to form was at Theddlethorpe in June 2022.
         Allerdale GDF Community Partnership focused its siting activities in a 124 square mile search area covering 13 electoral wards including Aspatria, Broughton St Bridgets, Dalton, Ellen & Gilcrux, Flimby, Harrington & Salterbeck, Maryport North, Maryport South, Moorclose & Moss Bay, Seaton & Northside, St John’s, St Michael’s, and Stainburn & Clifton.
         In a process that started in June of this year, each of the potential locations is being assessed by the NWS against a number of siting factors. These include safety and security, the environment, engineering feasibility, geology, transport and value for money. The overall goal is to ensure that a GDF can be constructed, operated, and closed safely. The initial stage of the process will involve geological surveys and desk-based studies of existing data on local geology and things such as transport infrastructure.
         NWS has now said that “Following a comprehensive and robust evaluation of information it was concluded only a limited volume of suitable rock was identifiable and the geology in the [Allerdale] area was unlikely to support a post-closure safety case. NWS has therefore taken the decision not to take Allerdale further in the search for a suitable site to host a GDF.”
         Corhyn Parr is the CEO of NWS. He said, “We need enough suitable geology to accommodate a GDF and to support safety cases to build, operate, and close the facility. Our assessments show evidence of limited volume of suitable rock for a GDF in the Allerdale search area, including the adjacent inshore area.”
         NWS stated that initial assessments of existing data and information for the other three communities in the siting process have indicated potentially suitable geology. Parr said that “The door also remains open for new communities to join the process.”
         When a site is ultimately selected, NWS said that a decision to construct a GDF would be taken only if the “potential host community has had a say and given consent through a Test of Public Support. The GDF requires both a suitable site and a willing community”.
         The U.K. has used nuclear technology for more than sixty years for such things as power generation, industry, medicine and defense. These activities have created a great deal of radioactive waste that must be managed safely. This waste is currently being stored at over thirty surface facilities across the U.K. These facilities must be replaced every fifty to one hundred years.

  • Nuclear Reactors 1279 – Kazatomprom Is Increasing Its Production Of Uranium

    Nuclear Reactors 1279 – Kazatomprom Is Increasing Its Production Of Uranium

         Kazatomprom is a uranium producer in Kazakhstan. The Kazatomprom board recently approved a strategy to increase production volumes in 2025. It will return to a one hundred percent level relative to its subsoil use agreements for the first time since 2018. This will add up to six thousand tons of uranium to the anticipated global primary supply.
         The decision was made due to improved uranium market conditions and successful medium- and long-term contracting activity with both new and existing customers. The company shared this information in its 2025 production plan. It said that 2025 production is now expected to be between thirty thousand five hundred tons and thirty-one thousand five hundred tons of uranium.
         Kazatomprom announced in 2017 that it would “flex down” production by twenty percent below its subsoil use agreements from the start of 2018 for three years to better match supply with demand. It subsequently extended this decrease. However, in August of 2022, it announced plans to increase uranium production in 2024 to ten percent below its subsoil use agreements. The additional volumes that are expected to be produced in 2025 will be used to meet contractional obligations under medium and long-term contracts according to the company.
         Kazatomprom remains committed to its market-centric strategy and its disciplined approach to production. Dastan Kosherbayev is the CCO of the company. He said that he is “excited to witness the start of a long-awaited historical shift in the uranium market”. He added that the company has shown “strong market discipline for seven consecutive years” in keeping its production 20% below the total subsoil use agreements.
         Kosherbayev went on to say that “Consistent with our market-centric strategy, our intention to return to a 100% level of Subsoil Use Contracts production volumes in 2025 is primarily driven by our strong contract-book and already growing sales portfolio against conservative 2023-2024 production scenario. As we are seeing a clear sign that the industry has entered into the new long-term contracting cycle, driven by the recognition of the restocking needs, Kazatomprom, with its best-class and lowest cost mines, is absolutely prepared to respond to these improving market conditions. Our current contract book provides sufficient confidence that the additional volume in 2025 will have a secure place in the market and be needed to fulfil future contractual obligations.”
         Kazatomprom said that it will now begin working with its joint venture partners and mining subsidiaries to incorporate the necessary changes into its 2024 budgets and development plans for the 2025 increase in production volumes. However, it added that it will “continue to monitor ongoing market developments and maintain the flexibility to react quickly to changing conditions”. No decision has yet been taken regarding mine development uncertainty. It explained that geopolitical uncertainty and global supply chain issues with high inflationary pressure “remain existent and the company may therefore potentially face challenges in increasing production significantly above stated levels”.
         Kazatomprom, through its subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, produces uranium from twenty-six uranium deposits which are grouped into fourteen mining assets. All of these sources use in-situ leach technology. Subsoil use contracts are agreements with the Kazakh government which cover the production of uranium by in-situ leach methods.

  • Nuclear Fusion 51 – Helion Energy Is Collaborating With Nucor To Provide Fusion Power – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 51 – Helion Energy Is Collaborating With Nucor To Provide Fusion Power – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Helion says that its approach is different from other fusion power reactor designs in three important ways. First, it utilizes a pulsed, non-ignition fusion system. The company explains, “This helps us overcome the hardest physics challenges, build highly energy-efficient devices, and allows us to adjust the power output based on need by adjusting the pulse rate.”
         The second major difference is that the Helion system is built to directly recover all unused and new electromagnetic energy efficiently. The company says, “Other fusion systems heat water to create steam to turn a turbine, which loses a lot of energy in the process.”
         The third important difference is that the Helion fusion reactor uses a deuterium and helium-3 fuel mixture. Deuterium-helium-3 fusion results in charged particles that can be directly recaptured as electricity. The company points out that “This helps keep our system small and efficient, allowing us to build faster and at a lower cost. This fuel cycle also reduces neutron emissions, substantially reducing many of the engineering challenges faced by users of deuterium-tritium fusion fuel.”
         Helion has constructed six prototype fusion reactors over the years. Trenta is its most recent prototype. The company claims that it ran nearly every day for two years. Trenta reportedly completed ten thousand high-power pulses and operated under vacuum for sixteen months. The company says, “With Trenta, Helion became the first private organization to reach plasma temperatures of one hundred eighty million degrees Fahrenheit (9 keV).” After successful test campaigns, Helion shut down Trenta in January of 2023.
         Helion is now focused on constructing its seventh fusion reactor prototype, called Polaris. According to Helion, Polaris is designed to demonstrate the production of a small amount electricity. It will have a higher magnetic field strength and an increase repetition rate when compared to Trenta. Helion hopes to begin the operation of Polaris by early 2024.
         Helion also notes several other technical milestones it has achieved. Among these milestones, the company claims that its magnets operate at over ninety percent energy efficiency. In addition, Helion says that its magnets have achieved compression fields over ten Tesla. It has also achieved sustained plasmas with lifetimes greater than one millisecond. The company says that “With every machine we build, we learn more about the capabilities of our science and technology. With rapid iteration and testing, we have been able to learn quickly and apply what we’ve learned to our next machines.”
         Earlier this year, Microsoft signed a power purchase agreement with Helion to buy electricity from Helion’s first commercial fusion power plant. That unit is expected to produce at least fifty megawatts after an initial ramp-up period. It is projected to come online in 2028.
         David Kirtley is the CEO of Helion. He said in a statement announcing the collaboration with Nucor that “A project like this is only made possible by working with a forward-looking company like Nucor, which is committed to decreasing its carbon emissions.”
         Topalian said that “This project marks a tremendous milestone in the potential for the use of nearly limitless clean electricity for industrial manufacturing. By entering this agreement, we are demonstrating our commitment to be the cleanest steel producer in the world, while setting an example for all manufacturing companies.”

  • Nuclear Fusion 50 – Helion Energy Is Collaborating With Nucor To Provide Fusion Power – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 50 – Helion Energy Is Collaborating With Nucor To Provide Fusion Power – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         Nucor Corporation is a manufacturer of steel and steel products. Helion Energy is a fusion energy company. These two companies are collaborating to develop a five-hundred-megawatt fusion power plant to supply baseload electricity to a steel making facility. The two companies are cooperating to set a firm timeline. They say that they they are “committed to beginning operations as soon as possible with a target of 2030.” Nucor said that it is making a direct investment of thirty-five million dollars in Helion to accelerate deployment of nuclear fusion power. Nucor claims that this is the first fusion energy agreement of this scale in the whole world. It expects this agreement to “pave the way for decarbonizing the entire industrial sector.”
         Leon Topalian is the chairman, president and CEO of Nucor. He said, “Nucor continues to position itself as a leader in developing clean energy solutions to decarbonize the industrial sector. This agreement with Helion, along with recent investments in clean energy, can change the entire energy landscape and forever change the world, embracing a clean energy future we could have hardly imagined a few years ago. We believe in the technology Helion is building and are proud to make this investment.”
         Helion’s technology involves raising fusion fuel to temperatures greater than one hundred million degrees Fahrenheit in a fusion reactor. The energy generated by the fusion reactor is converted directly to electricity using a high-efficiency pulsed approach. According to Helion, the deuterium and helium-3 fuel mixture is heated to plasma conditions while magnets confine in the plasma in a “Field Reversed Configuration (FRC).” The magnets accelerate two FRCs to one million miles per hour from opposite ends of the device so they collided in the center of the reactor.
        When the FRCs collide, they are further compressed by a very powerful magnetic field until they reach fusion temperatures (greater than one hundred eighty million degrees Fahrenheit). At this temperature, the deuterium and helium-3 ions are moving fast enough to overcome the forces that would otherwise have kept them apart and they fuse. This technology releases more energy than is consumed by the fusion process.
         As new fusion energy is generated in the reactor, the plasma expands. As the plasma expands, it pushes back on the powerful magnetic fields generated by the reactor’s magnetics. In accord with Faraday’s Law, the change in field induces current which is then directly recaptured as electricity. This allows the Helion fusion reactor to skip the steam cycle found in most other power plants that burn fuel.
         A highly renewable grid requires flexible and dispatchable power generation technology to maintain the reliability of the grid. Reciprocating internal combustion engines (RICE) are a mature, scalable, and cost-effective grid balancing solution. They have physical capabilities that are perfectly suited to integrate high levels of renewables, reduce carbon emissions, and maintain a reliable grid.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Nuclear Fusion 49 – General Atomics, Columbia University And The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Are Working On Plasma Instabilities In Tokamaks

    Nuclear Fusion 49 – General Atomics, Columbia University And The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Are Working On Plasma Instabilities In Tokamaks

         Researchers under the direction Chang Liu of Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) have discovered a promising approach to mitigating damaging runaway electrons created by plasma disruptions in tokamak fusion reactors. This approach harnesses a unique type of plasma waves that bears the name of astrophysicists Hannes Alfvén, a 1970 Nobel laureate.
         Alfvén waves have long been known to loosen the confinement of high-energy particles in tokamak reactors. This permits some particles to escape and reduces the efficiency of the donut-shaped fusion reactors. However, the new findings by Chang Liu and his team at General Atomics, Columbia University and PPPL have uncovered new techniques to deal with runaway electrons.
        The researchers found that such loosening can diffuse or scatter high-energy electrons before they can turn into avalanches that damage tokamak components. This process was determined to be circular. The runaway electrons create plasma instabilities that give rise to Alfvén waves that keep avalanches from forming.
         Chang Liu is a staff researcher at PPPL and the lead author of a paper that details the results of his work in the journal Physical Review Letters. He said, “The findings establish a distinct link between these modes and the generation of runaway electrons.”

         Researchers have derived a theory for the circularity of these interactions. The results of their experiments align well with runaway electrons in experiments on the DIII-D National Fusion Facility which is a Department of Energy (DoD) tokamak that General Atomics operates for the U.S. DoE Office of Science.
         Felix Parra Diaz is the head of the Theory Department at PPPL. He said, “Chang Liu’s work shows that the runaway electron population size can be controlled by instabilities driven by the runaway electrons themselves. His research is very exciting because it might lead to tokamak designs that naturally mitigate runaway electron damage through inherent plasma instabilities.”
        Plasma disruptions begin with sharp drops in the multi-million-degree temperatures required initiate and sustain fusion reactions. These drops in temperatures are called “thermal quenches”. They release avalanches of runaway electrons similar to earthquake-produced landslides. Liu said, “Controlling plasma disruptions stands as a paramount challenge to the success of tokamaks,”
         Plasmas are the hot, charged states of matter composed of free electrons and atomic nuclei called ions. Fusion reactions combine light elements in the form of plasmas to release vast amounts of energy. Fusion processes power the Sun and stars. Mitigating the risk of plasma disruptions and runaway electrons would provide a significant benefit for tokamak facilities designed to reproduce the fusion process on Earth.
         The new approach could have implications for the advancement of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER). ITER is the international tokamak project under construction in France to demonstrate the practicality of fusion energy and could mark a key step in the development of commercial fusion power plants.
         Liu said, “Our findings set the stage for creating fresh strategies to mitigate runaway electrons.” Experimental campaigns in which all three research centers aim to further develop the important findings with respect to runaway electrons.