The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Fusion 106 – Commonwealth Fusion Systems Working On Adding Louvers To Tokamaks To Cool Plasma

    Nuclear Fusion 106 – Commonwealth Fusion Systems Working On Adding Louvers To Tokamaks To Cool Plasma

         Decades of global, government-sponsored research in fusion science have established the tokamak-based reactor as the highest performing approach to fusion. In the past, tokamaks have had to be enormous in size to produce net energy from fusion. Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS) is using revolutionary superconducting magnets developed in collaboration with MIT to construct smaller and lower-cost tokamak fusion systems.
         CFS is currently developing a tokamak device called SPARC. The company is working to demonstrate the critical fusion energy milestone of producing more output power than input power for the first time in a device that can scale up to commercial power plant size. However, this achievement will only be possible if the plasma doesn’t melt the device.
         Researchers from CFS and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have collaborated on fusion boundary research through a series of projects. These projects include ORNL Strategic Partnership Projects and Laboratory Directed Research and Development projects, work under the Innovation Network for Fusion Energy (INFUSE) program, and other work in partnership with General Atomics.
         Throughout this collaboration, ORNL has developed the simulation capabilities that are necessary to address critical and time-sensitive design issues for the SPARC tokamak.
         The study was published in Nuclear Fusion. It evaluated actuator configurations, in particular those used to control neutral gas flowing in and out of the tokamak.
         A power-producing fusion plasma reactor must reach a temperature at its center hotter than the core of the Sun. At the same time, it must maintain a temperature at the edge of the plasma that is cool enough to avoid vaporizing the fusion device.
         New studies have found that using louvers at the bottom of the fusion device create local conditions that can reduce the temperature of the edge plasma. The louvers permit the hot plasma to “detach” from the walls of the device, spreading out the heat.
         In order to predict the actuators’ ability to control the plasma, ORNL developed new methods to execute a major simulation code, SOLPS-ITER, in a dynamic, time-dependent manner, focused on the actuator design.
         The SOLPS-ITER code models plasma and neutral transport in the boundary region of fusion devices. It has been used to design plasma-facing components for many tokamaks, including the multinational ITER device under construction in France.
         This new dynamic simulation goes beyond standard steady-state models and was developed in a staged manner. First, it considered only plasma transport for predictive control. Next, the response of neutral particles to louver actuators was added. Finally, a fully coupled dynamic model was developed.
         The CFS team used this information from their simulation to zero in on the simplest and least expensive actuator and diagnostics options from a large number of options. This effort enables fusion energy scientists to better control tokamak devices.
         The results of this study indicate a new path for handling this extreme heat, bringing researchers one step closer to a commercial fusion energy source. The study utilized a new simulation capability that accelerates work on whole-device modeling and helps inform researchers about the systems that will control the SPARC plasma.
    In addition to the SPARC tokamak project, CFS is working on its successor, the ARC power plant, to supply power to the electric grid.

    Commonwealth Fusion Systems 

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 20, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 20, 2025

    Ambient office = 121 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 116 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 118 nanosieverts per hour

    Corn from Central Market = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 71 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 19, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 19, 2025

    Ambient office = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 88 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 18, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 18, 2025

    Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 124 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 82 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 98 nanosieverts per hour

     

  • Nuclear Reactors 1465 – A Dutch Consortium Of Nuclear Companies Are Collaborating On Small Modular Reactors And Molten Salt Reactors

    Nuclear Reactors 1465 – A Dutch Consortium Of Nuclear Companies Are Collaborating On Small Modular Reactors And Molten Salt Reactors

         A Dutch consortium of technology companies including Demcon, Thorizon and VDL Group have signed a project agreement to demonstrate and validate the manufacturability, safety, and functionality of critical components and non-nuclear (sub)systems of molten salt reactors (MSR).
         The collaboration between Demcon, Thorizon and VDL Group was formalized in October of 2024 during a visit by Climate and Green Growth Minister Sophie Hermans to the Dutch Institute for Fundamental Energy Research (DIFFER), a leading research institute in Eindhoven. During her visit, the consortium partners, along with DIFFER, signed a letter of intent to facilitate small modular reactor (SMR) technology development in the Netherlands. A project agreement between the partners was signed in December of 2024. The consortium aims to establish an advanced testing facility where molten salt reactor technologies can be developed and tested.
         In early December of last year, the consortium reached a major milestone by submitting a grant application to the Province of Noord-Brabant. Thorizon said that this application highlights the commitment of the involved parties to foster innovation and sustainable development in the region.
         In 2021, Noord-Brabant launched the innovation coalition ‘Nuclear Energy for the Future’ with the goal of leveraging the manufacturing industry and research institutes in the province to accelerate the development of MSRs.
         Thorizon said, “Participating in this project will not only provide companies with valuable experience but also help them attain the qualifications needed to become part of the supply chain for SMRs and large-scale reactors planned in the Netherlands. This strengthens the competitiveness of the Dutch manufacturing sector, creates new jobs, and fosters innovation. The project aims to deliver several component prototypes and a test facility in Noord-Brabant within two and a half years.”
         Kiki Lauwers is the CEO of Thorizon. She said, “For Thorizon, this is a unique opportunity. Companies like VDL and Demcon have unparalleled experience in realizing high-tech projects, from concept to prototype and serial production. During our collaboration with DIFFER, we have seen that Brabant offers world-class knowledge and facilities and can act quickly. With these partners, we share an ambitious and pragmatic mindset that is crucial for our development and successful collaboration.”
         Thorizon is a spin-off from NRG Pallas, which operates the High Flux Reactor in Petten. It is developing a one-hundred megawatt MSR which is targeted at large industrial customers and utilities. The company plans to begin building its first reactor, Thorizon One, around 2030.
         Thorizon currently collaborates with nuclear industry leaders such as Orano, Tractebel and EDF, and its project has been selected by the European Commission and the French government under the France 2030 investment plan.
         MSRs use molten fluoride salts at low pressure as primary coolant. They may operate with fast neutron spectrums, and with a variety of fuels (A fast neutron spectrum is characterized by neutrons carrying energies above one million electron volts.) Much of the interest today in reviving the MSR concept relates to using thorium (to breed fissile uranium-233). An initial source of fissile material such as plutonium-239 needs to be provided.
         The DIFFER research institute conducts leading-edge research on fusion energy and chemical energy. It supports the development of MSRs through its unique DICE (DIFFER Irradiation-Corrosion Experiment) research facility. DICE is used to optimize material choices taking into account the interaction between corrosion, heat, and radiation.

    Thorizon

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 17, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 17, 2025

    Ambient office = 78 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 103 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour