The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1194 – Urenco Announces That It Is Pulling Out Of The U-Battery Project

    Nuclear Reactors 1194 – Urenco Announces That It Is Pulling Out Of The U-Battery Project

          Urenco is an international supplier of enrichment services and fuel cycle products for the civil nuclear industry, serving utility customers worldwide. It has just announced that it is withdrawing its support for the U-Battery advanced modular reactor (AMR) Project. It said that it had “exhausted its attempts to secure the commitment of new commercial investors”.
         The U-Battery is a four megawatt high-temperature gas-cooled micro-reactor which will be able to produce local electricity and heat for a range of energy needs. The project was initiated by Urenco in 2008. The concept design was developed by the University of Manchester and Dalton Institute in the U.K. The Technology University of Delft in the Netherlands was also involved. The consortium says that the technology uses high-integrity TRISO fuel. They aim to replace diesel power with clean, safe, and cost-effective energy for a variety of applications. These include remote communities and other off-grid location such as mining operations.
          The U-Battery consortium said that “Urenco has announced its intention to withdraw from the project due to necessary reprioritization under its strategy.”
         U-Battery’s supporting organizations include BWXT Technologies Inc, Cavendish Nuclear, Costain, Kinectrics, Jacobs, the UK’s National Nuclear Laboratory, Nuclear AMRC, Rolls-Royce and the University of Manchester.
         Urenco said, “The U-Battery team has completed its current program of work under the AMR RD&D program, and after dialogue and consultation with the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, and with other stakeholders, Urenco’s intention is to preserve the public investment in U-Battery by transferring its intellectual property to the National Nuclear Laboratory, subject to necessary due diligence and governance approvals.”
         Last January, U-Battery was granted its first legal patent for the design of its high-temperature gas-cooled reactor fuel element and core from the U.K. Intellectual Property Office. This means that the fuel element and reactor core design are protected in law for five years and up to a maximum of twenty years. U-Battery said that it was pursuing similar patents in the U.S. and Canada.
         U-Batter said, “Our work to date has set and defined the technology’s core characteristics, operational parameters, and future decommissioning plans and all to achieve the highest levels of safety … we are proud to have created a full-size model of the reactor pressure vessel, the intermediate heat exchanger vessel and the connecting duct. This demonstrated how the AMR can be built using modular techniques, making it easy to construct and to transport.”
         Chris Chater is the U-Battery Chief Technology Officer. He highlighted the “progress the U-Battery team have made to date; from a conceptual design developed by the Universities of Manchester (UK) and Delft (the Netherlands) to successfully winning UK government backing as part of AMR competitions from 2018 onwards. While Urenco has refocused its priorities, we continue to believe in the U-Battery design which could provide an innovative decarbonization solution for hard-to-abate sectors”.
          A spokesperson was asked if Urenco’s exit meant the end of the project. They said, “It is too soon to answer about the future of the project. The focus for now is on transferring the intellectual property and securing new opportunities for the employees”.

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 20, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 20, 2023

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 19, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 19, 2023

    Ambient office = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 82 nanosieverts per hour

    Oyster mushroom from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 130 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 119 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 18, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 18, 2023

    Ambient office = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Green onion from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 90 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 98 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 114 – U.K. and U.S. Colaborating On Testing Materials For Fusion Reactors

    Nuclear Fusion 114 – U.K. and U.S. Colaborating On Testing Materials For Fusion Reactors

         The United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) and the US Department of Energy’s (DoE’s) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have just entered into a strategic research partnership. The purpose of the partnership is to better understand the performance and behavior of materials required for use in commercial fusion power plants.
         UKAEA said, “One of the major challenges in harnessing fusion energy is developing materials to cope in extreme environments,” UKAEA said. “This is because high energy neutrons and extreme temperatures can weaken or change the desirable mechanical, thermal, optical or electronic properties of materials, which can reduce the lifetime of fusion machines.”
         The five-year partnership has three million six hundred thousand dollars in funding. Materials will be irradiated using neutrons at the ORNL High Flux Isotope Reactor, a DOE Office of Science user facility, located in the U.S. This research will attempt to understand how certain materials  respond to irradiation over long periods. The ultimate purpose of this research is to increase the longevity of the materials tested.
         The material selected for testing under the partnership will primarily focus on the ‘breeder blanket’. This is a component used to provide the tritium fusion fuel to make fusion power plants self-sufficient.
         Post irradiation testing will include tensile and hardness property measurements. This will help illuminate both the effect and the extent of radiation-induced hardening and concurrent loss of ductility in these materials.
          Advanced microstructural analysis will also be carried out to understand the effects of neutron radiation on chemical segregation and precipitate stability. UKAEA said that these assessments are critical to provide assurance that these alloys will be sufficiently durable and reliable to support a fusion power plant throughout the expected lifetimes of each component.
         The partnership will also see staff from the U.S. and the U.K. visits their counterpart facilities to share industry skills. The project is part of the UK Fusion Materials Roadmap, which was launched by UKAEA in 2021. The aim is to deliver new neutron-resilient materials as well as irradiation and post-irradiation testing to provide design engineers with data to build future fusion power plants.
         Amanda Quadling is the UKAEA’s Director of Materials Research. She said, “The partnership will allow UKAEA access to ORNL’s archive of existing irradiated materials, which include binary iron-chromium alloys, advanced steels, silicon carbide composites and copper alloys Alongside this, UKAEA will also be placing entirely new materials into the ORNL High Flux Isotope Reactor, including new high-temperature steels developed by both UKAEA and wider UK industry, permeation barrier coatings and welded materials.”
          Mickey Wade is ORNL’s Fusion Energy Division director. He said, “This research collaboration will be a critical piece of the economics of a fusion device in the future, establishing which materials can last for long periods in the fusion environment. This is a great opportunity for ORNL and UKAEA to partner on a key area for fusion.”
         Last February, UKAEA announced that it had awarded contracts worth a total of three million, eight hundred thousand dollars to eighteen organization. The contracts are to focus on overcoming specific technical and physical challenges to make fusion energy a commercial reality. Feasibility studies will be funded from sixty million dollars to two hundred forty-four million dollars from the UKAEA’s Fusion Industry Program and awarded through the UK government platform Small Business Research Initiative. The selected projects aim to tackle specific challenges linked to the commercialization of fusion energy. These include novel fusion materials and manufacturing techniques as week as innovative heating and cooling systems.

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 17, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 17, 2023

    Ambient office = 127 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 116 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 77 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 61 nanosieverts per hour