The Nucleotidings Blog The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box belowand click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
The first two lead units of a fifty-five megawatts variant of the Bharat small modular reactor (SMR) will be constructed at a Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) site by 2033, Minister of State Jitendra Singh has told parliamentarians.
Singh provided an update on the status of the DAE Bharat SMR offering in a written answer to the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian parliament, providing information on the two hundred megawatts version – the BSMR-200 – and a fifty-five megawatts version.
The BSMR-200 pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) will use low enriched uranium fuel, Singh said. He added that the “majority of equipment are within the capability of Indian industries”. India has constructed two hundred megawatt PHWRs since the 1980s, and is now constructing a fleet of indigenously designed seven hundred megawatt PHWRs.
Singh said that the BSMR-700 reactor is being designed and developed by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) to provide “captive” power generation for energy intensive industries such as steel, aluminum and cement; for repurposing retiring thermal power plants; and to provide electricity to remote locations without grid connectivity.
Singh added, “The lead unit will be located at a DAE site. The subsequent units are to be located at the sites of the end-user industry in case of captive power plants and at brownfields sites of retiring thermal power plants. Manufacturing and delivery of equipment and components will be carried out through various indigenous nuclear vendors developed by DAE. Development of critical items such as low alloy steel forgings required for manufacturing the reactor pressure vessel and reactivity control drive mechanisms have been realized by the domestic private vendors. Development works for other critical items such as reactor coolant pumps have been initiated with the private vendors. All major development works will be completed in the pre-project phase. The concept design of BSMR has been completed and is in approval stage. Estimated time for construction of BSMR is 60 to 72 months after receipt of project sanction.”
Singh continued, “The BSMR will contain passive safety features as well as “several engineered safety systems to ensure nuclear safety during accidents.” Spent nuclear fuel will be handled and stored in-situ, in line with India’s broad philosophy to recover “useful radioisotopes” by reprocessing. Remaining waste will be vitrified and stored in engineered facilities in line with internationally accepted practices. Singh said. “However, in the case of SMRs the reprocessing technology is to be re-engineered based on the fuel configuration.”
The 2025 budget includes an allocation of around two and a half billion dollars for the design and deployment of SMRs, Singh noted.
A fifty-five megawatts reactor is also being developed for deployment in remote locations, with the lead twin units to be “set up in a DAE site by 2033”.
Singh mentioned that “Depending on the projected demand, BSMR-200 also can be deployed for such purposes. Both these plants are designed to operate in isolated mode not connected to the grid.”
Nirmala Sitharaman is India’s Minister of Finance. He announced in the 2024 budget the government’s intention to research and develop the Bharat Small Modular Reactor. In this year’s budget which was announced in February, she promised federal funds to develop at least five Indian-designed SMRs to be operational by 2033. There will be amendments to Indian legislation to encourage private sector participation, as part of plans to develop at least one hundred gigawatts of nuclear energy by 2047.
Earlier this year, NPCIL issued a Request for Proposals from ‘visionary Indian industries’ to finance and build a proposed fleet of two hundred and twenty-two megawatts Bharat Small Reactors. Tata Power and the Naveen Jindal Group have previously expressed interest in setting up small modular reactors. In February, Minister for Railways Ashwini Vaishnaw told the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian parliament, that nuclear power is under consideration to meet the increasing power needs of the country’s rail sector.
The first two lead units of a fifty-five megawatts variant of the Bharat small modular reactor (SMR) will be constructed at a Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) site by 2033, Minister of State Jitendra Singh has told parliamentarians.
Singh provided an update on the status of the DAE Bharat SMR offering in a written answer to the Lok Sabha, the lower house of the Indian parliament, providing information on the two hundred megawatts version – the BSMR-200 – and a fifty-five megawatts version.
The BSMR-200 pressurized heavy water reactor (PHWR) will use low enriched uranium fuel, Singh said. He added that the “majority of equipment are within the capability of Indian industries”. India has constructed two hundred megawatt PHWRs since the 1980s, and is now constructing a fleet of indigenously designed seven hundred megawatt PHWRs.
Singh said that the BSMR-700 reactor is being designed and developed by Bhabha Atomic Research Centre and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) to provide “captive” power generation for energy intensive industries such as steel, aluminum and cement; for repurposing retiring thermal power plants; and to provide electricity to remote locations without grid connectivity.
Singh added, “The lead unit will be located at a DAE site. The subsequent units are to be located at the sites of the end-user industry in case of captive power plants and at brownfields sites of retiring thermal power plants. Manufacturing and delivery of equipment and components will be carried out through various indigenous nuclear vendors developed by DAE. Development of critical items such as low alloy steel forgings required for manufacturing the reactor pressure vessel and reactivity control drive mechanisms have been realized by the domestic private vendors. Development works for other critical items such as reactor coolant pumps have been initiated with the private vendors. All major development works will be completed in the pre-project phase. The concept design of BSMR has been completed and is in approval stage. Estimated time for construction of BSMR is 60 to 72 months after receipt of project sanction.”
Singh continued, “The BSMR will contain passive safety features as well as “several engineered safety systems to ensure nuclear safety during accidents.” Spent nuclear fuel will be handled and stored in-situ, in line with India’s broad philosophy to recover “useful radioisotopes” by reprocessing. Remaining waste will be vitrified and stored in engineered facilities in line with internationally accepted practices. Singh said. “However, in the case of SMRs the reprocessing technology is to be re-engineered based on the fuel configuration.”
The 2025 budget includes an allocation of around two and a half billion dollars for the design and deployment of SMRs, Singh noted.
A fifty-five megawatts reactor is also being developed for deployment in remote locations, with the lead twin units to be “set up in a DAE site by 2033”.
Singh mentioned that “Depending on the projected demand, BSMR-200 also can be deployed for such purposes. Both these plants are designed to operate in isolated mode not connected to the grid.”
Nirmala Sitharaman is India’s Minister of Finance. He announced in the 2024 budget the government’s intention to research and develop the Bharat Small Modular Reactor. In this year’s budget which was announced in February, she promised federal funds to develop at least five Indian-designed SMRs to be operational by 2033. There will be amendments to Indian legislation to encourage private sector participation, as part of plans to develop at least one hundred gigawatts of nuclear energy by 2047.
Earlier this year, NPCIL issued a Request for Proposals from ‘visionary Indian industries’ to finance and build a proposed fleet of two hundred and twenty-two megawatts Bharat Small Reactors. Tata Power and the Naveen Jindal Group have previously expressed interest in setting up small modular reactors. In February, Minister for Railways Ashwini Vaishnaw told the Rajya Sabha, the upper house of the Indian parliament, that nuclear power is under consideration to meet the increasing power needs of the country’s rail sector.
The United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) has taken an important step to support future fusion power plants. The UKAEA is collaborating with Eni, an Italian firm, for the construction of the world’s largest and most advanced tritium fuel cycle facility. This collaboration is expected to provide strong support to future fusion reactors as tritium is a vital fuel for fusion power stations. The collaboration also aims to conduct research and development activities in the field of fusion energy.
UKAEA stated that the tritium recovery and re-use will play a fundamental role in the supply and generation of the fuel in future fusion power plants, and it will be critical in making the technology increasingly efficient.
The “UKAEA-Eni H3AT Tritium Loop Facility” is designed to be a world-class facility providing industry and academia the opportunity to study how to process, store and recycle tritium, according to the recent announcement.
UKAEA and Eni will cooperate to develop advanced technological solutions in fusion energy and related technologies, including skills transfer initiatives.
Eni will contribute to the H3AT project with its expertise in managing and developing large-scale projects, helping to lower the risk in its roadmap. This collaboration combines UKAEA’s extensive expertise in fusion research and development with Eni’s established industrial-scale capabilities in plant engineering, commissioning, and operations.
Sir Ian Chapman is the CEO of UKAEA. He said, “We are delighted to be working with Eni who have shown great commitment to fusion. We believe that fusion energy can contribute to a net zero future, including going beyond the decarbonization of electricity. The H3AT demonstration plant will set a new benchmark as the largest and most advanced tritium fuel cycle facility in the world, paving the way for innovative offerings in fusion fuel and demonstrating the UK’s leadership in this crucial area of research and development.”
UKAEA shared that Eni supports a socially fair energy transition with the intention of promoting efficient and progressively more sustainable access to energy resources.
Eni places innovation at the center of its strategic vision. It has invested significantly in research, development, and the implementation of technologies to progressively decarbonize its energy mix and achieve carbon neutrality by 2050, according to a press release.
Fusion energy is expected to make important contributions to energy security and decarbonization. The process involves two hydrogen isotopes fusing together under intense heat and pressure to form a helium atom. This releases large amounts of emissions-free energy through a safe, cleaner, and virtually inexhaustible process.
Claudio Descalzi is the CEO of Eni. He said, “Fusion energy is meant to revolutionize the global energy transition path, accelerating the decarbonization of our economic and industrial systems, helping to spread access to energy, and reducing energy dependency ties within a more equitable transition framework. Today with our UK partners we are laying the foundations for further progress towards the goal of fusion which—if we consider its enormous scope of technological innovation—is increasingly concrete and not so far off in time. To continue this virtuous development, international system-level technological partnerships like this one are indispensable.”