The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for May 27, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient outside = 151 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 143 nanosieverts per hour

    Bannana from Central Market = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1514 – Sweden Passes Bill to Provide State Aid for Nuclear Power Projects

    Nuclear Reactors 1514 – Sweden Passes Bill to Provide State Aid for Nuclear Power Projects

    Sweden’s parliament is called the Riksdag. It has approved the government’s proposals for providing state funds to companies that want to invest in new nuclear reactors in the country. The new law will enter into force later in 2025.

    In October 2022, Sweden’s incoming center-right coalition government adopted a positive position towards nuclear energy. In November 2023, it revealed a roadmap which envisages the construction of new nuclear generating capacity equivalent to at least two large-scale reactors by 2035, with up to ten new large-scale reactors coming online by 2045.

    In a bill submitted to parliament on the 27th of March this year, the Swedish government proposed a new law regarding state support for nuclear power investments. The bill would provide state loans to finance new reactors as well as a contract-for-difference power price mechanism.

    The loans are intended to lower the cost of financing new nuclear projects. Individual loans will be limited to the equivalent of four large-scale reactors (about five thousand megawatts of capacity). The government pointed out that support may only be granted if the new reactors are located at the same location and have a total installed output of at least three hundred megawatts. The two-way Contracts for Difference may be entered into when a new reactor has become operational and has been licensed to produce electricity at full capacity.

    The parliament has now approved the government’s proposal. The new bill on state aid enters into force on the 1st of August of this year. Interested companies may apply for the aid after that date.

    Niklas Wykman is the Swedish Minister for Financial Markets. He said “This is a historic announcement that takes responsibility for public financing and taxpayers’ money when we enable actors to build new nuclear energy. An expansion of nuclear power is expected to result in greater price stability and lower system costs, which helps households as well as businesses. With new nuclear reactors, we are paving the way for higher growth, more jobs and better conditions to achieve the climate transition.”.

    The government appointed Mats Dillén in December 2023 to draft and submit proposals for models for financing and risk sharing for the construction of new nuclear power reactors. According to the mandate, the proposed models must be designed so that nuclear power with a total output of at least two thousand five hundred megawatts (equivalent to the output of two large-scale reactors) must be operational by 2035 at the latest.

    Dillén presented the findings of his study in August of 2024. His report said that the investigation “identified conditions which give rise to a discrepancy between a private investor’s business case for new nuclear power and the socioeconomic equivalent. It is concluded that efficiency reasons give a rationale for the state to support investments in nuclear power”.

    His proposed financing and risk sharing model consists of three main parts that lead to a lower cost of capital that facilitates new investments in nuclear power at a low cost. The sections of the report include state loans to finance investments in new nuclear power, which lowers the cost of capital; a two-way contract-for-difference signed between the state and the nuclear power producer; and a risk and gain-share mechanism that gives investors a minimum return on equity.

    Sweden

     

  • Geiger Readings for May 26, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 150 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 75

    Tap water = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 68 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for May 25, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 118 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 107 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 59 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for May 24, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 120 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 59 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 98 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 142 – Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics Creates First Helium-3 in a Stellarator

    Nuclear Fusion 142 – Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics Creates First Helium-3 in a Stellarator

    The Wendelstein 7-X (W7-X) fusion reactor at the world’s largest stellarator facility in the Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics has just successfully generated high-energy helium-3 ions for the first time.

    A press release from the Max Planck Institute said, “In the world’s largest stellarator facility, high-energy helium-3 ions were generated for the first time using ion cyclotron resonance heating – a milestone for fusion research.”.

    The experiment with the W7-X, an advanced fusion reactor operated by the Max Planck Institute, addressed a crucial challenge in harnessing fusion power. Future fusion power plants will have to be able to efficiently contain a multi-million-degree plasma.

    This plasma generates high-energy ‘alpha particles’ (helium-4 nuclei), which are critical for sustaining the extreme temperatures needed for continuous fusion reactions. If these particles escape containment too quickly, the plasma cools, and the reaction cannot be maintained.

    Given W7-X’s experimental nature and scaled-down design compared to a full-sized fusion power plant, scientists simulate these conditions using lighter, lower-energy particles.

    The scientists explained that “In practice, the lighter helium-3 ions are accelerated to a suitable energy for this purpose.”. The team employed an advanced technique known as ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) to achieve this.

    The press released added, “This is similar to pushing a child on a swing: to be effective, each push must be precisely in tune with the swing’s natural frequency – in other words, it must be in resonance.”.

    The ICRH process utilizes powerful, megawatt-range high-frequency waves. By injecting electromagnetic waves into a plasma containing hydrogen and helium-4, and tuning them to the specific ion cyclotron frequency at which helium-3 ions naturally orbit around the magnetic field lines, the particles efficiently absorb energy.

    The press release emphasized, “This is the first time that high-energy helium-3 ions have been produced in a stellarator using ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH): a world first in fusion research. The ICRH system is being developed and operated at W7-X under the umbrella of the Trilateral Euregio Cluster (TEC) in close collaboration between the Plasma Physics Laboratory of the Royal Military Academy in Brussels and the Jülich institutes IFN-1 and ITE.”.

    This innovation carries implications for research far beyond Earth. Scientists have discovered that the same resonant processes driving helium-3 particles in the W7-X might explain a perplexing phenomenon on the sun.

    The team of researchers at the Max Planck Institute said, “This research contributes to developing a sustainable energy source and provides unexpected insights into how the sun works. The same resonance processes that excite helium-3 particles in W7-X may also explain the occasional occurrence of helium-3-rich clouds in its atmosphere.”.

    It is theorized that helium-3 particles in the sun could be selectively accelerated by naturally occurring electromagnetic waves which causes the formation of massive clouds containing up to ten thousand times more helium-3 than usual.

    The press release concluded that “These findings show that fusion science is not only shaping the future, but also helping to unlock the mysteries of the cosmos around us.”.

    Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics