The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 02, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 02, 2025

    Ambient office = 69 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 82 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 70 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 103 – A Collaboration Of U.S. Laboratories Is Working On Making An Alloy Of Vanadium For Fusion Reactor Cores – Part 2 of 3 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 103 – A Collaboration Of U.S. Laboratories Is Working On Making An Alloy Of Vanadium For Fusion Reactor Cores – Part 2 of 3 Parts

    Part 2 of 3 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Jordan Tiarks is another scientist at Ames Lab who is working on the project led by PNNL. He is focused on a different aspect of this reactor research. His team is relying on Ames Lab’s thirty-five years of experience leading the field in gas atomization, powder metallurgy, and technology transfer to industry to develop materials for the first wall structural material in a fusion reactor.
         Tiarks said, “The first wall structural material is the part that holds it all together. It requires more complexity and more structural strength. Things like cooling channels need to be integrated in the structural wall so that we can extract all of that heat, and don’t just melt the first wall material.”
         Tiarks’s team hopes to utilize over a decade of research focused on developing a unique way of creating oxide dispersion strengthened (ODS) steel for next generation nuclear fission reactors. ODS steel contains very small ceramic particles (nanoparticles) that are distributed throughout the steel. These particles improve the metal’s mechanical properties and assist in the ability to withstand high irradiation.
         Tiarks said, “What this project does is it takes all of our lessons learned on steels, and we’re going to apply them to a brand-new medium, a vanadium-based alloy that is well suited for nuclear fusion.”
         The major challenge that Tiarks’s team now faces is how vanadium behaves differently from steel. Vanadium has a much higher melting point, and it is more reactive than steel. It cannot be contained with ceramic. Instead, his team must use a similar but different process for creating vanadium-based powders.
         Tiarks explained, “We use high pressure gas to break up the molten material into tiny droplets which rapidly cool to create the powders we’re working with. And [in this case] we can’t use any sort of ceramic to be able to deliver the melt. So what we have to do is called ‘free fall gas atomization’. It is essentially a big opening in a gas die where a liquid stream pours through, and we use supersonic gas jets to attack that liquid stream.”
         There are some significant challenges with the method Tiarks described. The first problem is that it is less efficient than other methods that rely on ceramics. The second problem is that due to the high melting point of vanadium, it is harder to add more heat during the pouring process. This would provide more time to break up the liquid into droplets. The third problem is that vanadium tends to be reactive.
         Tiarks added that “Powders are reactive. If you aerosolize them, they will explode. However, a fair number of metals will form a thin oxide shell on the outside layer that can help ‘passivate’ them from further reactions. It’s kind of like an M&M. It’s the candy coating on the outside that protects the rest of the powder particle from further oxidizing.”
         Tiarks continued that, “A lot of the research we’ve done in the Ames lab is actually figuring out how we passivate these powders so you can handle them safely, so they won’t further react, but without degrading too much of the performance of those powders by adding too much oxygen. If you oxidize them fully, all of a sudden, now we have a ceramic particle, and it’s not a metal anymore, and so we have to be very careful to control the passivation process.”
         Tiarks went on to explain that discovering a powder processing method for vanadium-based materials should make them easier to form into the complicated geometric shapes that are necessary for the second layer to function properly. In addition, vanadium will not interfere with the powerful magnetic fields in the reactor core.
    Please read Part 3 next

    Iowa State University

  • Geiger Readings for Jan 01, 2025

    Geiger Readings for Jan 01, 2025

    Ambient office = 59 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

    Savoy cabbage from Central Market = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 102- A Collaborations Of U.S. Laboratories Is Working On Making An Alloy Of Vanadium For Fusion Reactor Cores – Part 1 of 3 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 102- A Collaborations Of U.S. Laboratories Is Working On Making An Alloy Of Vanadium For Fusion Reactor Cores – Part 1 of 3 Parts

    Part 1 of 3 Parts
         Researchers at the U. S. Department of Energy (DoE) Ames National Laboratory and Iowa State University are leading efforts to overcome material challenges to making commercial fusion a reality. The research teams are part of a DoE Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy (ARPA-E) program referred to as “Creating Hardened And Durable fusion first Wall Incorporating Centralized Knowledge” (CHADWICK). They will research materials for the first wall of a fusion reactor. The first wall is the part of the reactor that surrounds the fusion reaction. It bears the brunt of the extreme heat and pressure in the fusion reactor core.
         ARPA-E recently selected thirteen projects under the CHADWICK program. Of those thirteen, Ames Lab leads one of the projects. It is also collaborating with Iowa State on another project, which is led by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL).
         Nicolas Argibay is a scientist at the Ames Lab and the lead of one project. One of his key challenges in harnessing fusion-based power is containing the plasma core that generates the energy. The plasma is like a miniature sun that needs to be contained by materials that can survive a combination of extreme temperature, extreme pressure, irradiation, and magnetic fields while efficiently extracting heat for conversion to electricity.
         Argibay explained that in the reactor core, the plasma is contained by a strong magnetic field, and the first wall surrounds this environment. The first wall has two layers of material. One layer is closest to the strong magnetic and plasma environments. The other layer will help move the energy along to other parts of the system.
         The first layer material needs to be structurally sound, and able to resist cracking and erosion over time. Argibay also said that it cannot stay radioactive for very long because the reactor needs to be turned on and off for maintenance without endangering anyone working on it. The project that Argibay is leading is focused on the first layer material.
         Argibay said, “I think one of the things we [at Ames Lab] bring is a unique capability for materials design, but also, very importantly, for processing them. It is hard to make and manage these materials. On the project I’m leading, we’re using tungsten as a major constituent, and with the exception of some forms of carbon, like diamond, that’s the highest melting temperature element on the periodic table.”
         Special equipment is required to process and test refractory materials, which have extremely high melting temperatures. In Argibay’s lab, the first piece of equipment installed was a commercial, modular, customizable, open-architecture platform for making refractory materials. The lab will explore advanced and smart manufacturing methods to make the process more efficient and reliable.
         Argibay added, “Basically, we can make castings and powders of alloys up to and including pure tungsten, which is the highest melting temperature element other than diamond.”
         By spring of 2025, Argibay said that they intend to have two additional systems in place for creating these refractory materials at both lab-scale and pilot-scale quantities. He explained it is easier to make small quantities (lab-scale) than larger quantities (pilot-scale). However, larger quantities are important for collecting meaningful and useful data that can translate into a real-world application.
         Argibay’s team also has the ability to examine the mechanical properties of refractory materials at relevant temperatures. Systems able to make measurements well above eighteen hundred degrees Fahrenheit are rare. Ames Lab has one of the only commercial thermal testers in the country that can measure tensile properties of alloys at temperatures up to twenty-seven hundred degrees Fahrenheit. This puts the lab in a unique position to support process science and alloy design.
    Please read Part 2 next

    Ames National Laboratory

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 31, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 31, 2024

    Ambient office = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 77 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 940 – Florida Has Approved Plans For Mosaic To Use Radioactive Waste From Phosphorus Production For Road Building

    Radioactive Waste 940 – Florida Has Approved Plans For Mosaic To Use Radioactive Waste From Phosphorus Production For Road Building

         Florida is considering a project proposal to test an unconventional road-building material. This material is phosphogypsum, which is a radioactive byproduct of phosphate mining. Phosphogypsum is a waste product created during the production of phosphorus, an essential nutrient in fertilizers.
         To extract phosphorus from ore, phosphate rock is dissolved in acid. This process separates uranium, which winds up in the acid. Radium remains in the leftover material. This remaining waste is referred to as phosphogypsum.
         Radium naturally decays and releases radioactive radon gas which is known to increase the risk of lung cancer when people are exposed to it for extended periods.
         Because of these risks, federal regulations require phosphogypsum to be stored in specially designed structures called engineered stacks. These stacks are huge, often hundreds of feet tall and cover large areas. They resemble small mountains. The purpose of these stacks is to keep the radioactive material contained and to limit human exposure in order to maintain public safety.
         A few days ago, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved a pilot project by Mosaic, the largest phosphate producer in the United States. The Mosaic project involves building four test road sections at Mosaic’s New Wales facility in Polk County, Florida. They will be using phosphogypsum as a road base.
        The EPA rated the project’s risks as “low” based on multiple modeling efforts. The approval is limited to this specific project. Any broader applications in road building would require additional evaluations and regulatory approvals.
         Radon is an odorless and colorless gas and it poses significant health risks when present at elevated levels. According to the Center for Biological Diversity, it is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the U.S. It is responsible for about twenty-one thousand deaths annually. Prolonged exposure, especially near phosphogypsum-based roads, could pose a threat to public health. Federal regulators have historically banned phosphogypsum in construction due to the presence of this radioactive risk.
         In 1992, the EPA mentioned potential dangers for construction workers and future residents living near roads containing phosphogypsum. Exceptions to the ban have been made for controlled agricultural and research uses.
         Critics have argued that the EPA’s approval of the Mosaic project prioritizes industry interests over public safety.
         Florida has faced problems with phosphogypsum in the past. In 2021, a breach at a former phosphate mining site released 215 million gallons of toxic water into Tampa Bay. This resulted in environmental and public health crises.
         Ragan Whitlock is an attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity. He said, “That [release] dramatically increases the potential for harm to our road crews and water quality.” He accused the EPA of yielding to political pressure from the phosphate industry.
         Environmentalists also point out the long-term implications of using radioactive material in infrastructure. Concerns include radon exposure for road workers and communities living near phosphogypsum roads. There is also concern about potential contamination of water sources.
         Jackie Barron is a Mosaic representative. He emphasized the cost advantages of using phosphogypsum compared to traditional materials such as limestone rock. In 2023, he said, “If there is an alternative use for this material, and we don’t have to grow or manage these stacks unnecessarily, then why would we not go down that path?”
         Florida passed legislation last year that expanded the list of materials allowed in public road construction. However, Florida’s Department of Transportation must still review phosphogypsum’s suitability before its widespread adoption.
         The phosphogypsum issue has experienced political shifts. The first Trump administration approved phosphogypsum’s use in roads. However, the Biden administration later reversed this decision. It remains unclear how the incoming Trump administration will address the material’s future.
         Mosaic’s pilot project may pave the way for innovative recycling. However, it also highlights the need for careful risk assessment. The debate over phosphogypsum use in road construction highlights the broader challenge of balancing economic benefits with environmental and public health concerns.
         Florida’s experiment may serve as a critical case study for the rest of the country. Whether the Mosaic project turns out to be a breakthrough or a misstep, the outcome will have a lasting impact for road construction and radioactive waste management in the U.S.

    Mosaic