The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1077 – Russia Still Exporting Nuclear Reactors In Spite Of Sanctions – Part 2 of 3 Parts

    Part 2 of 3 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         It is no surprise that any country considering starting a nuclear program and sourcing foreign technology will sooner or later seek out Rosatom for a bid.
         In 2009, the World Bank published a report outlining the significant energy challenges faced by Bangladesh’s fast-growing economy. The report identified “significant shortages of power generation capacity and natural gas”.
         Ijaz Hossain is the dean of engineering at the Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology. He said, “They thought that the fuel to run these plants would come automatically. However, now gas reserves are declining and the price of oil is rising. Bangladesh is finding it very difficult to get fuel.”
         Currently, Bangladesh’s energy sector is heavily dependent on fossil fuels such as coal and diesel. Hydro and other renewable energy sources made up less than one percent of total net electricity generation in 2020-21. This was reported by Bangladesh’s Power Development Board.
         Hossain said, “We are a small country in terms of land. Renewable energy uses a lot of land and we use most of our land for agriculture. Pursuing renewables aggressively may compromise food security.
          Michael Bradshaw is a professor of Global Energy at the Warwick Business School.  He said, “One can see why nuclear energy is an elegant solution to a set of challenges that a country like Bangladesh may face.”
         Bangladesh is heavily dependent on the export of garments. This industry has done little to contribute to the current climate of crisis but is seriously affected by it. Nuclear energy is seen to be a promising source of low-carbon electricity. However, the construction of foreign financed nuclear power reactors will do little to reduce Bangladesh’s dependence on foreign technology and financial resources to power its development. Bradshaw said, “If Russia is able to step in and provide this solution then so be it. But the question is going to be: how is Bangladesh going to pay it back?”
         On August 1St, the MV Kamilla, a Russian cargo ship, docked at the Mongla port in Bangladesh for the first time since the Russians invaded Ukraine. The ship was loaded with three thousand three hundred and twenty-eight tons of equipment intended for use in the construction of a nuclear power plant in Rooppur.
         The Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant (R-NPP) will be Bangladesh’s first nuclear power plant. The first unit of the new plant is expected to go into operation in 2023. It is estimated that the plant will eventually provide as much as fifteen percent of the electricity consumed in Bangladesh.
         Construction of the R-NPP began in 2017 following the signing of a deal between Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission (BAEC) and Russia’s state-owned nuclear power company, Rosatom, in December of 2015. The agreement stated that twelve billion six hundred and fifty million dollars would be invested to build two twelve-hundred-megawatt nuclear power reactors in Rooppur.
    Please read Part 3 next

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 18, 2022

    Ambient office = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 114 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 81 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1076 – Russia Still Exporting Nuclear Reactors In Spite Of Sanctions – Part 1 of 3 Parts

    Part 1 of 3 Parts
         Since 2014, the U.S. and the E.U. have promoted an international sanctions campaign against Russia’s energy sector. These efforts to decouple international dependencies on Russian energy were accelerated following Russia’s recent invasion of Ukraine.
         The energy sector of the Russian Federation economy itself is not subject to comprehensive sanctions. However, prohibitions or restrictions may apply to certain energy-related transactions under several sanctions authorities, including prohibitions issued pursuant to E.O. 13662, E.O. President Joe Biden’s Executive Order (E.O.) targeting the Russian energy sector places prohibitions or restrictions on certain energy-related transactions and imposes primary restrictions that have a far-reaching impact on the energy and marine sectors. The U.S. president signed an executive order last March banning the import of any Russian hydrocarbons.
          The E.U. recently announced its plan to cut Russian natural gas imports by two-thirds by the end of 2022. The recent explosions that breached the Nord Stream pipeline carrying Russian natural gas to Europe may accelerate the reduction of natural gas coming from Russia. By 2027, the European block hopes to completely ban import of Russian fossil fuels.
         In recent decades, Russia, through Rosatom, has been one of the world’s biggest exporters of nuclear reactors. On March 15, 2022, Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy (CGEP) hosted a private, virtual roundtable focusing on the consequences of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on energy markets and geopolitics, as well as possible future actions of the United States, the European Union, and allied countries. The report of the roundtable by Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy is titled Columbia Global Energy Dialog | Russia and Sanctions: Impacts on Energy Markets and Geopolitics.  Of the 439 nuclear power reactors in operation in 2021, eighty were either in Russia or they were Russian VVER type located in other countries. By the end of 2021, fifteen more Russian-type reactors were under construction in other countries.
         In spite of these aggressive sanction programs, Rosatom, Russia’s state-run nuclear giant, has managed to avoid any sanctions which allows it to continue nuclear projects in countries such as Bangladesh and Egypt.
         Paul Dabbar is the CEO of Bohr Quantum Technology and distinguished visiting fellow at the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA. He said, “In comparison to natural gas and crude oil, which are commodities you can buy from virtually any place, nuclear is a much narrower market. With nuclear energy, the supply chains are significantly more fragile, and the replacement opportunities are way less. So, when you sanction one country, you are effectively sanctioning the one and only company that can provide certain services.”
         Russia’s core involvement in the international nuclear power supply chain reached beyond Russian-styled reactors. The country is in the top ten producers of mined and refined uranium globally. Kazakhstan is the top uranium producer in the world and a close ally of Russia. It accounted for nearly forty percent global uranium conversion services in 2020. This analysis was included in the Columbia University’s report.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 17, 2022

    Ambient office = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 116 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 90 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 16, 2022

    Ambient office = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 79 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Oct 15, 2022

    Ambient office = 79 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 99 nanosieverts per hour