The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 07, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 07, 2024

    Ambient office = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 112 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 112 nanosieverts per hour

    Mini cucumber from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 71 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 61 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 96 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 95 – Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Working On Spin Polarization For Nuclear Fusion – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 95 – Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Working On Spin Polarization For Nuclear Fusion – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
          Ahmed Diallo is a PPPL principal research physicist and co-author of the paper. He compares tritium-burn efficiency to the efficiency of a gas stove. Diallo said, “When gas comes out of a stove, you want to burn all the gas. In a fusion device, typically, the tritium isn’t fully burned, and it is hard to come by. So, we wanted to improve the tritium-burn efficiency.”
         The PPPL team consulted the fusion community and the broader community involved in spin polarization in their quest to find ways to enhance tritium-burn efficiency. Parisi said, “Fusion is one of the most multidisciplinary areas of science and engineering. It requires progress on so many fronts, but sometimes there are surprising results when you combine research from different disciplines and put it together.”
         Quantum spin is very different from the physical spin that a pitcher can put on a baseball. A good pitcher can throw the ball with many different spins. There is a whole continuum of possibilities. However, there are only a few discrete options for the quantum spin on a particle such as up and down.
         When two fusion fuel ions have the same quantum spin, it is more likely that they will fuse. Parsi said, “By amplifying the fusion cross section, more power can be produced from the same amount of fuel.”
         While current spin-polarization methods don’t align every ion, the gains shown in the PPPL model don’t require one hundred percent spin alignment. In fact, the study demonstrates that even small levels of spin polarization can substantially improve the efficiency of the tritium burn, improving overall efficiency and reducing tritium consumption.
         With less tritium required, the size of the fusion power plant can be reduced, making it easier to license, situate and construct. This should lower the operating costs of the fusion system.
         Tritium is radioactive, and its radiation is relatively short-lived compared to the spent fuel from nuclear fission reactors. This reduction in the amount of tritium required has safety benefits because it decreases the risk of tritium leakage or contamination.
         Parisi said, “The less tritium you have flowing through your system, the less of it will get into the components.” The storage and processing facilities necessary for the tritium can also be made much smaller and more efficient. This makes nuclear licensing easier.
         Parsi continued, “People think that the site boundary size is somewhat proportional to how much tritium you have. So, if you can have a lot less tritium, your plant could be smaller, faster to get approved by regulators and cheaper.”
         More work is needed to investigate things that will be needed to implement the proposed system but have yet to be fully explored. Schwartz said, “Whether it’s possible to have integrated scenarios that maintain a high-grade fusion plasma with these specific flows of excess fuel and ash from the plasma needs to be determined.”
         Diallo said there are also potential problems related to polarization methods, but these create opportunities. He said, “One challenge would be to demonstrate techniques to produce spin-polarized fuel in large quantities and then store them. There’s a whole new technology area that would open up.”

    Spin polarization

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 06, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 06, 2024

    Ambient office = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Crimini mushroom from Central Market = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 72 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 94 – Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory  Working On Spin Polarization For Nuclear Fusion – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 94 – Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Working On Spin Polarization For Nuclear Fusion – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         A different mixture of fuels with enhanced properties could solve some of the major challenges to making fusion a more practical energy source, according to a new study.
         The new approach would still utilize deuterium and tritium, which are generally accepted as the most promising pair of fuels for commercial fusion energy production. Deuterium is an isotope of hydrogen with one neutron in its nucleus. Tritium is a radioactive isotope of hydrogen which has two neutrons in its nucleus.
         Tritium is rare on Earth.  It is produced naturally in the atmosphere when cosmic rays collide with air molecules, and is found in very small or trace amounts in groundwater throughout the world. Tritium is also a byproduct of the production of electricity by nuclear power plants. It mostly exists in the form of tritiated water and generally behaves as such in both the environment and the body. For this reason, tritium is widely dispersed in the environment, a very small addition to other radiation background levels.
         The quantum properties of the fuel would be adjusted for peak efficiency using an existing process known as spin polarization. In addition to spin polarizing roughly half of the fuels, the percentage of deuterium would be increased from the usual amount of about sixty percent or more.
         The U.S. Department of Energy’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) is mastering the art of using plasma— the fourth state of matter — to solve some of the world’s toughest science and technology challenges. That’s why public and private researchers worldwide look to PPPL for guidance on plasma science and related engineering challenges.
         The PPPL conducts essential research across a full range of plasma applications, such as developing fusion as a clean, safe and virtually limitless power source or creating the next generation of materials for microelectronics and quantum sensors and devices. With an eye toward sustainability, the Lab is also exploring ways that plasma can be used to help meet net-zero carbon targets. This includes advancing low-carbon technologies and understanding how clouds, light and aerosols interact for potential cooling strategies.
         Models created by researchers at the PPPL showed that the approach allowed tritium to burn more efficiently without sacrificing fusion power. This could significantly reduce the amount of tritium needed to start up and maintain fusion reactions which could lead to more compact and affordable fusion systems.
         Jason Parisi is a staff research physicist at the Lab and first author on the research paper. He said, “Fusion is really, really hard, and nature doesn’t do you many favors, So, it was surprising how big the improvement was.”
         The paper, titled Simultaneous Enhancement of Tritium Burn Efficiency and Fusion Power with Low-Tritium Spin-Polarized Fuel, was published in the journal Nuclear Fusion, suggests that the new approach could burn tritium as much as ten times more efficiently. The research also emphasizes PPPL’s role at the forefront of fusion innovation. This is especially true when it involves a system such as the one studied in Parisi’s research. In his research, gases are superheated to create a plasma confined by magnetic fields into a shape similar to a cored apple.
         The PPPL’s primary fusion reactor, the National Spherical Torus Experiment—Upgrade (NSTX-U), has a shape similar to the one that the researchers considered when they tested their approach.
         Jacob Schwartz is a PPPL staff research physicist and co-author. He said, “This is the first time researchers have looked at how spin-polarized fuel could improve tritium-burn efficiency.”
    Please read Part 2 next

    Simultaneous Enhancement of Tritium Burn Efficiency and Fusion Power 

  • Geiger Readings for Dec 05, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Dec 05, 2024

    Ambient office = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Hydorponic tomato from Central Market = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 130 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 120 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 876 – Chinese President Xi and U.S. President  Discussed Nuclear Weapons At The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit

    Nuclear Weapons 876 – Chinese President Xi and U.S. President Discussed Nuclear Weapons At The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit

         Last Saturday at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) conference in Lima, Peru, U.S. President Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed that any decision to use nuclear weapons should be controlled by humans, not by artificial intelligence.
         This is the first time that China has made this statement. It comes at a time when Biden is getting ready to leave office. Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan told reporters that the agreement was an important first step for the two nuclear powers to address a long-term strategic risk of nuclear war.
         Biden’s goal in the meeting was to emphasize the importance of stability in the U.S. – China relationship during the transition of power in the U.S., and to try to nail down gains he had made with Xi on issues like counternarcotics and climate.
         Xi said that China wants to work with the incoming Trump White House. He continued, “China is ready to work with the new U.S. administration to maintain communication, expand the cooperation and manage differences. Our position of resolutely safeguarding China’s sovereignty, security and development interests remains unchanged.”
         At the start of the ninety-minute meeting, held on the sidelines of the APEC summit, Xi said that the relationship between the two countries was “the world’s most important bilateral relationship.” Biden said, “How we get along together is going to impact the rest of the world.”
         Xi mentioned that the bilateral relationship had “gone through ups and downs” during Biden’s term. He and took specific aim at the Biden administration’s export controls on advanced technology. These restrictions are aimed at advanced semiconductor manufacturing tools, the most advanced types of semiconductor chips and technology used in military systems, hypersonic missiles, autonomous systems, and surveillance.
         In his opening remarks, Xi dedicated considerable time to talking about competition in “an age of flourishing sci-tech revolution”. He said, “Only mutually beneficial cooperation can lead to common development. ‘Small yard, high fences’ is not what a major country should pursue.” This was a direct reference to the U.S. export control policy.
         Biden’s team is advocating for the incoming U.S. administration to carry on the export controls, Sullivan said. Prior to the meeting, Sullivan had told reporters that he saw some continuity with the incoming Trump administration. He specifically mentioned Representative Mike Waltz, who Trump has just named as his national security adviser, and Senator Marco Rubio, who Trump will nominate for Secretary of State, for their focus on the strategic challenges posed by China.
        Trump made tariffs on imports of Chinese goods a feature of his first term in office and vowed during his campaign to hike tariffs on China again in his second term.  Biden had kept most of Trump’s in place during his time in office.
         Sullivan said Biden reiterated his concerns about Chinese trade practices during the APEC summit. He also said Biden was concerned about China’s support for Russia’s defense industrial base. He urged Xi to use his influence over North Korea to stop that country from sending more troops to fight for Russia against Ukraine.

    Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation