The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1545 – Oak Ridge National Laboratory Researchers Test 3D Printed Parts in the High Flux Isotope Reactor

    A blue light coming from a machine

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    Scientists at the Department of Energy’s (DoE) Oak Ridge National Laboratory have successfully fired up 3D-printed stainless-steel capsules inside one of the world’s most powerful nuclear reactors, proving they can take the heat.

    The team tested two experimental capsules at the lab’s High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR), a facility that provides one of the world’s highest neutron flux environments. These capsules are made from 316H stainless steel. They are designed to hold sample materials during irradiation experiments.

    Acting as both pressure and containment barrier, the capsules help researchers determine how different materials respond to intense nuclear conditions, which is a critical part of qualifying components for reactor use.

    Oak Ridge’s Manufacturing Demonstration Facility utilized a laser powder-bed fusion system to 3D print the stainless-steel parts. This specific type of steel is employed for its high-temperature strength, corrosion and radiation resistance, and proven nuclear-grade performance.

    After they were printed, the capsules were assembled and qualified by ORNL’s Irradiation Engineering group before undergoing a month-long irradiation period at HFIR.

    The capsules were removed fully intact. This marks a significant step in demonstrating that additively manufactured components can meet the stringent safety standards required in nuclear environments. The successful test paves the way for future nuclear components to be designed and produced using additive manufacturing.

    Ryan Dehoff is the director of the MDF at ORNL. He said, “As we demonstrate the reliability of these printed components, we’re looking at a future where additive manufacturing might become standard practice in producing other critical reactor .”

    HFIR provides one of the world’s highest neutron flux environments. This allows researchers to test and qualify fuels and materials under conditions such as those found in a nuclear reactor.

    Fabricating and qualifying experimental capsules to irradiate fuel and material samples is an expensive and time-consuming process, demanding custom materials and designs.

    By leveraging additive manufacturing, the team of researchers intends to streamline what has traditionally been a costly and time-consuming process.

    Richard Howard is a group leader in the Nuclear Energy and Fuel Cycle Division at ORNL. He said, “The nuclear materials and fuels research communities are being asked to qualify advanced reactor technologies to survive very harsh conditions. Additive manufacturing will expand my group’s toolset to develop innovative experiments to support this critical need.”

    Custom experimental capsules usually require specialized materials and lengthy fabrication timelines. 3D printing provides the potential to cut both time and cost, paving the way for faster innovation in nuclear materials and fuels research.

    This research work was sponsored by the Department of Energy’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technologies Office (AMMTO) program. AMMTO supports a globally dominant U.S. manufacturing and industrial base for a resilient energy system and secure supply chain. 

    HFIR operates as a DoE Office of Science user facility. Completed in 1965 and operating at eighty-five megawatts, HFIR’s steady-state neutron beam is the strongest reactor-based neutron source in the U.S. The hot and cold neutrons produced by HFIR are used to study physics, chemistry, materials science, engineering, and biology. The intense neutron flux, constant power density, and constant-length fuel cycles are used by more than five hundred researchers every year for neutron scattering research into the fundamental properties of condensed matter.

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory

  • Geiger Readings for Jul 09, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 84 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 998 – MIT, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and the University of Orléans Study Behavior of Radionuclides In Geological Repositories – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    A green and blue logo

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)

    For their study, the researchers looked at a thirteen-year-old experiment, with an initial focus on cement-clay rock interactions. Over the last several years, a mix of both negatively and positively charged ions were added to the borehole located near the center of the cement emplaced in the formation. The researchers focused on a one-centimeter-thick zone between the radionuclides and cement-clay which is referred to as the “skin.” They compared their experimental results to the software simulation and found that the two datasets aligned.

    Sarsenbayev said, “The results are quite significant because previously, these models wouldn’t fit field data very well. It’s interesting how fine-scale phenomena at the ‘skin’ between cement and clay, the physical and chemical properties of which changes over time, could be used to reconcile the experimental and simulation data.”

    The new experimental results showed that the model successfully accounted for electrostatic effects associated with the clay-rich formation and the interaction between materials in Mont Terri over time.

    Sarsenbayev added, “This is all driven by decades of work to understand what happens at these interfaces. It’s been hypothesized that there is mineral precipitation and porosity clogging at this interface, and our results strongly suggest that. This application requires millions of degrees of freedom because these multibarrier systems require high resolution and a lot of computational power. This software is really ideal for the Mont Terri experiment.”

    This new model can now replace older models that have been used to conduct safety and performance assessments of underground geological repositories.

    Sarsenbayev said, “If the U.S. eventually decides to dispose nuclear waste in a geological repository, then these models could dictate the most appropriate materials to use. Currently, clay is considered an appropriate storage material, but salt formations are another potential medium that could be used. These models allow researchers to visualize the fate of radionuclides over millennia. They can be used to understand interactions at timespans that vary from months to years to many millions of years.”

    Sarsenbayev explained that the model is reasonably accessible to other researchers and that future efforts may focus on the use of machine learning to develop surrogate models that are less computationally expensive. Further data from the experiment will be available later this month. The team plans to compare those data to additional simulations.

    Sarsenbayev continued, “Our collaborators will basically get this block of cement and clay, and they’ll be able to run experiments to determine the exact thickness of the skin along with all of the minerals and processes present at this interface. It’s a huge project and it takes time, but we wanted to share initial data and this software as soon as we could.”

    The researchers hope that their study leads to a long-term solution for storing nuclear waste that policymakers and the public can support.

    Sarsenbayev said that “This is an interdisciplinary study that includes real world experiments showing we’re able to predict radionuclides’ fate in the subsurface. The motto of MIT’s Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering is ‘Science. Systems. Society.’ I think this merges all three domains.”

    University of Orléans

  • Geiger Readings for Jul 08, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 131 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    White onion from Central Market = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 104 nanosieverts per hour

  • Radioactive Waste 997 – MIT, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and the University of Orléans Study Behavior of Radionuclides in Geological Repositories – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    A blue logo with white text

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    Part 1 of 2 Parts

    As countries across the world experience a resurgence in nuclear energy projects, the questions of where and how to dispose of nuclear waste still looms large. The U.S. has indefinitely stalled its only long-term underground nuclear waste repository project. Scientists are using both modeling and experimental methods to study the effects of underground nuclear waste disposal and they hope to build public trust in the decision-making process.

    New research from scientists at MIT, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab, and the University of Orléans are making progress in that direction. Their study indicates that simulations of underground nuclear waste interactions, generated by new, high-performance-computing software, aligned well with experimental results from a research facility in Switzerland.

    The study was co-authored by MIT Ph.D. student Dauren Sarsenbayev and Assistant Professor Haruko Wainwright, along with Christophe Tournassat and Carl Steefel. It has been published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

    Sarsenbayev said, “These powerful new computational tools, coupled with real-world experiments like those at the Mont Terri research site in Switzerland, help us understand how radionuclides will migrate in coupled underground systems.”

    The authors hope their research will improve confidence among policymakers and other stakeholders in the long-term safety of underground nuclear waste disposal.

    Wainwright said, “This research—coupling both computation and experiments—is important to improve our confidence in waste disposal safety assessments. With nuclear energy re-emerging as a key source for tackling climate change and ensuring energy security, it is critical to validate disposal pathways.”

    Disposing of nuclear waste in deep underground geological formations is currently considered the safest long-term solution for managing high-level radioactive waste such as spent nuclear fuel. Much effort has been put into studying the migration behaviors of radionuclides from nuclear waste within various natural and engineered geological materials.

    Since its founding in 1996, the Mont Terri research site in northern Switzerland has served as an important test bed for an international consortium of researchers interested in studying materials like Opalinus clay. This clay is a thick, water-tight claystone abundant in the tunneled areas of the mountain.

    Sarsenbayev explained, “It is widely regarded as one of the most valuable real-world experiment sites because it provides us with decades of datasets around the interactions of cement and clay, and those are the key materials proposed to be used by countries across the world for engineered barrier systems and geological repositories for nuclear waste.”

    For their research paper, Sarsenbayev and Wainwright collaborated with co-authors Tournassat and Steefel, who have developed high-performance computing software to improve modeling of interactions between nuclear waste and both engineered and natural materials.

    Several challenges have limited scientists’ understanding of how nuclear waste reacts with cement-clay barriers. The barriers are made up of irregularly mixed materials deep underground. The existing class of models commonly used to simulate radionuclide interactions with cement-clay do not consider electrostatic effects associated with the negatively charged clay minerals in the barriers.

    Tournassat and Steefel’s software takes into account electrostatic effects, making it the only software that can simulate those interactions in three-dimensional space. The software is called CrunchODiTi. It was developed from established software known as CrunchFlow and was most recently updated this year. CrunchODiTi is designed to be run on many high-performance computers at once in parallel.

    Lawrence Berkeley National Lab

    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Jul 07, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 126 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 130 nanosieverts per hour

    Purple onion from Central Market = 108

    Tap water = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 102 nanosieverts per hour