The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Radioactive Waste 995 – Argonne Nation Laboratory and Fermilab Are Collaborating On Small Linear Accelerators to Reduce Radioactivity of Spent Nuclear Fuel

    A blue and white logo

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    Researchers in the U.S. have secured three million two hundred thousand dollars in federal funding to design a compact, economical linear accelerator (linac) that can transmute long-lived nuclear waste into safer material.

    The U.S. Department of Energy’s (DoE) Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) and Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab) were given the funding as part of ARPA-E’s Nuclear Energy Waste Transmutation Optimized Now (NEWTON), program.

    The program, part of a nearly one hundred- and twenty-five-million-dollar investment to manage and reduce the nation’s high-level nuclear waste, aims to make the reprocessing of U.S. spent nuclear fuel economically viable within the next thirty years.

    This aligns with Argonne and Fermilab’s joint effort to modernize superconducting linear accelerators by developing a smaller, more affordable, and more reliable system designed to power nuclear waste transmutation which is a process that converts long-lived radioactive isotopes into shorter-lived ones.

    With more than ninety thousand metric tons of spent nuclear fuel stored across U.S. power plants, particle accelerators are considered the most promising existing technology to address the problem.

    Specialized components known as superconducting cavities are stacked within linear particle accelerators. These systems efficiently generate proton beams that create an intense flux of neutrons from heavy-element targets usually made of lead or bismuth. The neutrons are released through a process called spallation.

    Michael Kelly is an Argonne physicist and team leader. He said that when directed at radioactive waste inside a reactor, the neutrons multiply and essentially ‘burn’ the spent nuclear fuel, transforming it into a material that decays much faster.

    Most current accelerator cavities are typically made of pure niobium. They are bulky and can cost several hundred thousand dollars apiece. They also require cooling by expensive centralized cryogenic systems that consume large quantities of liquid helium at temperatures between minus four hundred-and fifty-four degrees Fahrenheit and minus four hundred- and fifty-two-degrees Fahrenheit. When grouped into units of six to eight, called cryomodules, they can be as big as a railroad freight car.

    The researchers have now turned to niobium-three-tin (Nb₃Sn), an emerging material in accelerator science. This coating is only a few microns thick. It can be vapor-deposited inside accelerator cavities to improve efficiency and reduce the consumption of helium.

    Instead of relying on large central cooling systems, the researchers plan to use compact cryocoolers distributed along the linac, minimizing the risk of single-point failures.

    Kelly said, “We think it’s a big deal,” adding that the team won’t know exactly how much the size and cost can be reduced until they’ve accomplished a lot more research and development. “That’s a major part of what this R&D intends to address.”

    According to the team, the new niobium-three-tin cavities will require less helium for cooling and could even replace today’s large, water heater-sized cavities with much smaller ones, potentially a fifth the size, roughly comparable to a coffee can.

    Fermilab’s expertise in cryogenic systems and cavity coatings is expected to play a huge part in advancing the technology. Scientists Grigory Eremeev and Sam Posen are leading efforts to improve the vapor diffusion process. Eremeev points out that the challenge of adapting coatings to complex geometries is a problem that the team is actively working to solve.

    The new technology also deals with the risk of total shutdown if a central cryogenic plant fails. Current designs rely on large liquid helium refrigerators that, if malfunctioning, can bring the entire system offline. The researchers now plan to replace this arrangement with a distributed network of compact, fault-tolerant ten-watt cryocoolers.

    By decentralizing the cooling system, the researchers aim to reduce the chances of system-wide failure and ensure smoother operation. The linac must achieve an uptime of at least ninety five percent to keep the transmutation process stable. Repeated stops and restarts can place stress on the spallation target. This increases the risk of mechanical and thermal damage over time.

    Posen concluded in a press statement, “Support from DoE made it possible to develop highly capable niobium-three-tin coating facilities at Fermilab and to develop techniques to achieve high performance in cavities with complex geometries. Now we are building on that foundation, advancing coating techniques and applying them to these exciting applications.”

    The linac project is among eleven chosen in 2025 to share forty million dollars in ARPA-E NEWTON funding aimed at advancing technologies for recycling spent nuclear fuel.

    Fermilab

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 02, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 86 nanosieverts per hour

    Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 144 – Hefei Institutes of Physical Science in China is Working on Increasing Output Energy in Their BEST Fusion Reactor

    A black background with blue text

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

    Creating a fusion reaction and sustaining that reaction for a net energy output is one of the most difficult engineering challenges humans have ever attempted to solve. The challenge is so immense that thirty-five countries (including the U.S., China, Russia, and several countries in the European Union) have joined forces to build the International Thermonuclear Experiment Reactor (ITER) which is a magnetic confinement tokamak (a.k.a. donut-shaped) reactor that hopes to see first plasma by 2035. While that’s the world’s best foot forward when it comes to fusion research, individual countries are also pursuing their own commercial fusion energy goals. And no country is doubling down harder than China.

    China’s Burning Plasma Experimental Superconducting Tokamak fusion reactor (BEST) is intended to create five times its current energy output to revolutionize global energy production. It is an intermediary reactor between China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST), a first-generation tokamak reactor and the Chinese Fusion Engineering Test Reactor (CFETR) which is a fusion plant demonstrator.

    Located in Hefei, China, the BEST reactor utilizes a complex tokamak design. According to Sustainability Times’ reporting on May 8, it employs a doughnut-shaped vessel that heats plasma to temperatures hotter than the surface of the sun. It fuses hydrogen isotopes to form helium, which releases massive amounts of energy.

    Nuclear fusion is preferable to nuclear fission because it creates much less radioactive waste. Radioactive waste must be carefully managed and often requires significant storage space. Several countries are working on permanent geological repositories to store spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste. In the U.S. it is estimated that there will be no permanent repository until 2060 at the earliest. Eliminating the need for waste management streamlines energy production.

    The fusion process also releases minimal harmful gases into the atmosphere. Fueling power plants with coal, natural gas, and oil creates dangerous carbon pollution. The released gases heat the planet, destabilize the climate, upset ecosystems, and further the spread of diseases.

    While other major fusion projects, such as China’s Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak and the U.S. Smallest Possible ARC prototype fusion machine (SPARK), have made strides, the BEST reactor is an important breakthrough. The U.S. SPARC reactor only promises to double its energy output while BEST aims to quintuple its output.

    This high energy output would vastly improve the world’s sustainability. With commercial fusion power plants, energy would be near-limitless and thus easily accessible and substantially more affordable. People could enjoy lower utility bills and consistent, reliable energy while reducing the carbon pollution of the atmosphere.

    The innovative BEST reactor would help slow down climate change and lead to a cleaner, cooler future. It would also help people save money and access clean energy. Reducing the pollution of energy production will benefit every human, reducing the health hazards of breathing polluted air or drinking contaminated water.

    The BEST reactor is scheduled for delivery by November of 2027, and it could be the beginning of a major energy revolution.

    The environmental benefits of fusion power combined with the financial savings and high energy output mean that China’s new BEST reactor could change how we think about and use energy. It’s an important leap forward in the development of commercial nuclear fusion technology and a critical step toward a healthier Earth.

    Hefei Institutes of Physical Science

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 01, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 88 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Shallot from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 81 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 881 – The U.S. and Iran Continue Negotiations to Craft a New Nuclear Agreement

    Nuclear Weapons 881 – The U.S. and Iran Continue Negotiations to Craft a New Nuclear Agreement

    The U.S. government has sent Iran a proposal for a nuclear deal between the two countries, the White House confirmed on Saturday.

    Abbas Araghchi is the Iranian Foreign Minister. He said that he had been presented with “elements of a US deal” by his Omani counterpart Badr Albusaidi during a short visit to the Iranian capital.

    The proposal comes after a report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog said that Iran had further stepped up its production of enriched uranium, a key component in the construction of nuclear weapons.

    Karoline Leavitt is the White House Press Secretary. She said that on Saturday it was in Tehran’s “best interest to accept” the deal, adding, “President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb.”.

    Leavitt said that a “detailed and acceptable” proposal had been sent to Iran by U.S. President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff.

    Araghchi wrote on X that the US proposal “will be appropriately responded to in line with the principles, national interests and rights of the people of Iran”. The precise details of the deal are not yet clear.

    The proposal follows a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), which found Iran now possesses over eight hundred and eighty pounds of uranium enriched to sixty percent purity. This is close to the ninety percent purity required for weapons-grade uranium. It is well above the level of purity required for civilian nuclear power and research purposes.

    Iran has enough uranium to make about ten nuclear weapons if it is further refined. Iran is the only non-nuclear-armed state producing uranium at this level. Iran has repeatedly said that their nuclear program is peaceful.

    The U.S. has long sought to limit Iran’s nuclear capacity to build nuclear weapons. Talks between the U.S. and Iran mediated by Oman have been under way since April.

    Both sides have expressed optimism during the course of the talks but still remain divided over key issues. Chief among them is the question of whether Iran can continue enrichment under any future agreement.

    Despite the ongoing negotiations between Iran and the U.S., the IAEA report offered no indication that Iran has slowed its nuclear enrichment efforts.

    Iran has produced highly enriched uranium at a rate equivalent to the amount needed for one nuclear weapon per month over the past three months, the IAEA report found.

    U.S. officials estimate that, if Iran chooses to make a nuclear weapon, it could produce sufficient weapons-grade uranium in less than two weeks and potentially build a bomb within months.

    Iran has consistently denied it is attempting to develop nuclear weapons. However, the IAEA said it could not confirm whether this continued to be the case because Iran refuses to grant access to senior inspectors and has not answered longstanding questions about its nuclear history.

    Trump is seeking a new nuclear agreement with Tehran after withdrawing the U.S. from a previous nuclear agreement between Iran and six world powers in 2018.

    This nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action or JCPOA, was signed in 2015 by Iran and the U.S., China, France, Russia, Germany and the U.K.

    The JCPOA sought to limit and monitor Iran’s nuclear program in return for lifting sanctions that had been placed on the regime in 2010 due to suspicions that its nuclear program was being used to develop a nuclear weapon.

    However, Donald Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal during his first term in office, claiming JCPOA was a “bad deal” because it was not permanent and did not address Iran’s ballistic missile program, amongst other things.

    Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action

     

  • Geiger Readings for May 31, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 107 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 143 – Researchers at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Have Found a New Way to Shed Excess Heat in a Tokamak

    Nuclear Fusion 143 – Researchers at the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Have Found a New Way to Shed Excess Heat in a Tokamak

    Nuclear fusion reactors can generate energy by fusing (i.e., joining) two light atomic nuclei to form a heavier nucleus. These fusion reactions release huge amounts of energy, which can then be converted into electrical power without emitting greenhouse gases.

    One of the most reliable and promising fusion reactor designs is the tokamak. Tokamaks are fusion reactors that use a doughnut-shaped magnetic field to confine and heat plasma (i.e., superhot, electrically charged gas) for the time necessary for fusion reactions to take place.

    Despite their potential for the generation of large amounts of clean energy, future tokamaks face huge challenges in managing the intense heat produced by fusion reactions. One major problem is the fact that the confined plasma can interact with the walls of the reactors, damaging them and adversely impacting both their durability and performance.

    Researchers at the TCV tokamak experiment at École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) recently discovered a new form of plasma radiation that could prevent tokamaks from overheating. It would allow them to shed excess heat and thus potentially boost their performance over time. The new technique they proposed, which they dubbed X-point target radiator (XPTR), was introduced in a paper published in Physical Review Letters.

    Kenneth Lee is first author of the paper. He said, “Reducing divertor heat loads is a key challenge for future fusion power plants. One promising approach, the X-point radiator, dissipates plasma energy near the X-point, but scalability is uncertain due to its proximity to the core. We investigate experimentally the effect of adding a secondary X-point along the divertor channel to broaden operational range and maintain core plasma confinement. This concept is known as the X-point target divertor.”

    In tokamaks, an X-point is a location where magnetic field lines run purely toroidally. This is central in shaping the plasma and guiding heat away from the core via a narrow magnetic funnel known as a ‘divertor’. X-point radiators are plasma operating conditions in which a large fraction of the plasma heat is converted into uniform radiation in proximity to the X-point.

    In their paper, Lee and his colleagues perform experiments in which another X-point is introduce along the divertor. This occurs outside of the zone in which the plasma is confined. Adding this secondary X-point could further permit the removal of excess heat. This would prevent damage to the tokamak and enhances its durability.

    Lee explained, “We leverage TCV tokamak’s unique magnetic shaping flexibility to introduce a secondary X-point, and we discovered localized radiation (the ‘XPTR’) far from the plasma core, which preserves core performance while significantly reducing divertor heat load. We found that the X-point target radiator is highly stable and can be sustained over a wide range of operational conditions, potentially offering a much more reliable method for handling power exhaust in a fusion power plant.”

    In the initial tests, the approach introduced by the researchers was found to perform remarkably well. It removed excess heat from the magnetically confined plasma more effectively than conventional setups.

    This new X-point target configuration is set to be implemented in next-generation tokamak devices that are being developed by Commonwealth Fusion Systems in collaboration with Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

    Lee added, “We are now conducting new high-power experiments to explore the parameter range of the X-point target radiator, complemented by state-of-the-art numerical simulations to better understand its underlying physical mechanisms. The next-generation tokamak, SPARC, plans to incorporate the X-point target divertor into its baseline design, making our findings timely and crucial.”

    École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne