The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Ambient office = 46 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 110 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 112 nanosieverts per hour
Blueberry from Central Market = 122 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 108 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 94 nanosieverts per hour
Nuclear Debris from Fukushima Plant Moved to Lab nippon.com
SUNY Sullivan hosts event to remember nuclear test victims with film screening and Q&A midhudsonnews.com
Rolls-Royce sells stake in SMR business to fund nuclear expansion thechemicalengineer.com
Russia Nuclear Attack Submarine Detected Near US Ally’s Waters newsweek.com
Ambient office = 68 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 126 nanosieverts per hour
Avocado from Central Market = 80 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 108 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 92 nanosieverts per hour
Iran’s nuclear sites ‘more exposed than ever,’ says new Israeli defense minister nupost.com
Nuclear watchdog chief says room to maneuver on Iran ‘shrinking’ citizentribune.com
Boiling water reactor at Shimane nuclear plant to be restarted in early December japantimes.com
NANO Nuclear joins US-Southeast Asia nuclear initiative investing.com
Ambient office = 84 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 81 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 84 nanosieverts per hour
White onion from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 77 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 66 nanosieverts per hour
Dover Sole from Central = 105 nanosieverts per hour
A new report indicates Washington state could face an energy crisis within five years as its power capacity approaches its limit. The growing demands from AI and major tech companies like Amazon, Microsoft, and Google are causing a strain on the state’s energy resources.
Amazon just signed a deal with Energy Northwest and X-energy, investing in four new small modular reactors (SMRs) along the Columbia River in Richland near Hanford which is the most contaminated nuclear site in the U.S. Some groups are asking why we’re risking this again?
Leona Morgan is an indigenous organizer. During a panel hosted by the organization Columbia Riverkeeper, she said, “Nuclear kills, and nuclear is killing my people. Nuclear is what we call ‘a slow genocide.” Morgan says that the health impacts her family and other indigenous people face arise from radioactive exposure and contamination on their land.
Morgan added, “Just because we can’t see it, it’s out of sight out of mind, doesn’t mean it’s not happening. And if you need proof of it, come visit us. See an abandoned uranium mine anywhere in the world? On Navajo, we have over 2,000.”
The panel came just after Amazon’s SMR announcement. Riverkeeper maintains that nuclear energy is far from clean. Morgan added that “It’s the most expensive, complicated, dirtiest way to boil water.” She went on to explain that the carbon footprint of nuclear power is only counted at the power plant, not during the process to build it and the toxic waste left behind.
Billions of dollars in federal and local money go to fund nuclear site decommissioning and cleaning every year. Washington state just approved a record three billion dollars to spend on cleanup at the Hanford site this year.
According to Riverkeeper, the money Amazon is investing in SMRs near Hanford could be better invested in renewables like solar, wind and hydro. Members of Riverkeeper say that nuclear power isn’t the clean energy savior that big tech makes it out to be.
M.V. Ramana was a panelist at the Riverkeeper event. He said, “When it comes to companies like Google, Microsoft and Amazon, the public has plenty of reasons to be angry at them. These companies steal your data, they do bad things, they want to pretend to be good citizens. The reason they can use investment in nuclear energy as a way to pretend they are good citizens is because the hard work of convincing the public has already been done by the nuclear lobby.”
Ramana is the author of the book “Nuclear is not the Solution: The Folly of Atomic Power in the Age of Climate Change.” He says we should focus on energy conservation instead.
Kelly Rae works in corporate communications with Energy Northwest. She told an interviewer that the permits for the SMRs haven’t been secured yet, although lawmakers from Jay Inslee on down are already lining up behind the project.
Rae says that Amazon’s funding will pay for a feasibility study over the next two years, after which they are hopeful to fund the SMRs. If they’re successful, the electricity generated from the first four reactors would be available to Amazon only. Rae says that after that, other utility companies and municipalities could buy power to help Amazon fund additional reactors to provide energy for Washingtonians.
Energy Northwest is an association of 28 utility districts, including Seattle City Light, Tacoma Public Utilities and Snohomish County PUD. Amazon didn’t say how much it intends to spend on the project, or how much, if any, will come from Energy Northwest.
So far, there aren’t any other small modular reactors like the ones Amazon intends to invest in, operating in the U.S.
Trump victory sets off renewed calls in ROK to go nuclear to counter North Korea nknews.com
EU eyes new clampdown on Russian nuclear sector eenews.net
German opposition MPs propose checking feasibility of restarting nuclear plants cleanenergywire.org
Ukraine Now Faces a Nuclear Decision foreignpolicy.com
Ambient office = 97 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 70 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 67 nanosieverts per hour
Yellow bell pepper from Central Market = 122 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 77 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 66 nanosieverts per hour
Weeks ago, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer announced that the Palisades Nuclear Power Plant is set to reopen. Since then, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) continues to find alarming levels of equipment damage unexpectedly caused by the extended shutdown of the plant.
The plant was designed in 1960 and never upgraded to include modern industry-standard safety measures. It was shut down in May 2022 and sold the next month to Holtec International. Since then, the company has received a one and a half billion-dollar loan from the U.S. Department of Energy and a one billion three hundred million dollar grant from the Department of Agriculture, as well as three hundred million-dollar grant from Michigan 2025 budget to restart the plant. If all goes according to plan, Palisades is expected to be the first nuclear power plant in American history to be successfully restarted.
However, the multiple new safety issues recently discovered by the NRC and analyzed by nuclear experts may delay or even permanently halt the project.
The NRC’s October report revealed rapid degradation of the plant’s steam generator tubes since its last inspection in 2020. Stress corrosion cracking now affects up to fourteen hundred steam generator tubes across both units. Some cracks neared ninety percent through-wall depth in just one operating cycle. This undermines the plant’s ability to safely return to service.
Part of the unexpectedly rapid damage is due to the age of the two steam generators and tubes. They were installed in 1990 using Alloy 600 material, which is now known for its particular susceptibility to stress corrosion cracking. Additionally, the tubes were improperly stored during the two-year shutdown period. This caused seven hundred tubes in one steam generator and two hundred and forty-eight in the other to now require significant repair.
Alan Blind is a former nuclear plant manager and design engineering manager at Palisades who has spent forty years holding high positions in the nuclear industry. He has urged the NRC since July to rigorously investigate the plant and ensure that it complies with modern safety regulations.
Blind said, “The Palisades restart is unprecedented. It represents the first time a plant with such thin safety margins and outdated design has been considered for reactivation. Palisades has not been modernized to meet current safety standards…The concern is that stress corrosion cracking can lead to sudden tube rupture under accident conditions, allowing radioactive material to bypass containment structures.”
The situation at Palisades is certainly not unique. New York’s now-shuttered nuclear plant Indian Point Energy Center was set to reopen in 2000. However, years of closure had generated similar safety issues that ultimately ended the venture.
Nick Culp is the Holtec Palisades’ senior manager of government affairs and communications. He said in an interview that the company remains optimistic that the plant will be restarted by fall 2025.
Culp said, “The latest information will not derail [Holtec] from its timetable.” Holtec’s plans to stabilize and plug all damaged tubes, rather than take the costly and time-consuming route of replacing the tubes.
China eyes expansion of radioisotope industry world-nuclear-news.org
Rosatom 3D-prints first part for use in a nuclear facility world-nuclear-news.org
Air Force fires a commander at Montana nuclear missile base after investigation taskandpurpose.com
UN Nuclear Chief Plans Iran Visit To Tackle Disputed Atomic Program themedialine.org
