The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Ambient office = 93 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Black rice from Central Market = 147 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 97 nanosieverts per hour
Filtered water = 74 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient office = 105 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 109 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hour
Garlic bulb from Central Market = 132 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 99 nanosieverts per hour
Filtered water = 77 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient office = 105 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 108 nanosieverts per hour
English cucumber from Central Market = 140 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 102 nanosieverts per hour
Filtered water = 76 nanosieverts per hour
Dover sole – Caught in USA = 119 nanosieverts per hour
I have often blogged about the spent nuclear fuel that is piling up at the commercial nuclear power plant sites in the U.S. For the moment, the spent fuel is kept on site in cooling pools or dry casks made of concrete and steel. The U.S. will not have a undergrounds geological repository to permanently dispose of spent nuclear fuel until 2050 at the soonest. When (and if) such a repository is created, it will be necessary to move the spent nuclear fuel from the reactor sites to the repository. It is likely that any repository will be in the southwestern U.S. while most of the nuclear power reactors are east of the Mississippi. This means that thousand of tons of spent nuclear fuel will have to be moved thousands of miles which will take years. Having safe transportation methods is obviously a very important piece of disposing of spent nuclear fuel.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced that Holtec International’s HI-STAR 100MB transportation package for moving spent nuclear fuel has been certified for use in the U.S. Holtec says that they expect that the HI-STAR cask is “destined to become America’s workhorse for transporting used nuclear fuel.”
The HI-STAR 100MB is based on the design of the Holtec HI-STAR 100 package. HI-STAR 100 in turn was developed from the HI-STAR 190 cask which was designed for the retrieval of large-diameter canisters from U.S. nuclear power plants with dry cask facilities on site for spent nuclear fuel storage. The HI-STAR 100MB is intended to retrieve medium-sized canisters that contain spent fuel with high-burnups and shorter cooling times that are allowed by the specifications for the HI-STAR 100.
Holtec says “Among the technology differentiators of the HI-STAR 100MB are its ability to ship contents packaged in an MPC or in a ‘bare basket’, to transport both moderate burn-up and high burn-up fuel in the various sizes employed in light water reactors, and to transport fuel with as little as 3.5 years of decay after discharge from the reactor.”
Holtec applied to the NRC for certification for the HI-STAR 100MB in February of last year. When they submitted the application, they expected that the review process would proceed quickly because the design of the HI-STAR 100MB transportation system was directly based on designs that had already been approved by the NRC.
Holtec said, “The certification of HI-STAR 100MB at present includes the high capacity canister, MCP-32M, and ‘bare baskets’ F-24M and F-32M, all using Metamic-HT as basket material for optimal performance, The cask is however sized to hold any canister loaded in the industry up to 68.5 inches in diameter which means almost every canister commissioned into dry storage in the US before 2014.”
Ambient office = 83 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 103 nanosieverts per hour
Eggplant from Central Market = 123 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Filtered water = 76 nanosieverts per hour
I have often blogged about the spent nuclear fuel that is piling up at the commercial nuclear power plant sites in the U.S. For the moment, the spent fuel is kept on site in cooling pools or dry casks made of concrete and steel. The U.S. will not have a undergrounds geological repository to permanently dispose of spent nuclear fuel until 2050 at the soonest. When (and if) such a repository is created, it will be necessary to move the spent nuclear fuel from the reactor sites to the repository. It is likely that any repository will be in the southwestern U.S. while most of the nuclear power reactors are east of the Mississippi. This means that thousand of tons of spent nuclear fuel will have to be moved thousands of miles which will take years. Having safe transportation methods is obviously a very important piece of disposing of spent nuclear fuel.
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has announced that Holtec International’s HI-STAR 100MB transportation package for moving spent nuclear fuel has been certified for use in the U.S. Holtec says that they expect that the HI-STAR cask is “destined to become America’s workhorse for transporting used nuclear fuel.”
The HI-STAR 100MB is based on the design of the Holtec HI-STAR 100 package. HI-STAR 100 in turn was developed from the HI-STAR 190 cask which was designed for the retrieval of large-diameter canisters from U.S. nuclear power plants with dry cask facilities on site for spent nuclear fuel storage. The HI-STAR 100MB is intended to retrieve medium-sized canisters that contain spent fuel with high-burnups and shorter cooling times that are allowed by the specifications for the HI-STAR 100.
Holtec says “Among the technology differentiators of the HI-STAR 100MB are its ability to ship contents packaged in an MPC or in a ‘bare basket’, to transport both moderate burn-up and high burn-up fuel in the various sizes employed in light water reactors, and to transport fuel with as little as 3.5 years of decay after discharge from the reactor.”
Holtec applied to the NRC for certification for the HI-STAR 100MB in February of last year. When they submitted the application, they expected that the review process would proceed quickly because the design of the HI-STAR 100MB transportation system was directly based on designs that had already been approved by the NRC.
Holtec said, “The certification of HI-STAR 100MB at present includes the high capacity canister, MCP-32M, and ‘bare baskets’ F-24M and F-32M, all using Metamic-HT as basket material for optimal performance, The cask is however sized to hold any canister loaded in the industry up to 68.5 inches in diameter which means almost every canister commissioned into dry storage in the US before 2014.”
The HI-STAR 190 is big enough to transport the extra-large canisters which have been deployed in the past five years. It can also transport some of the larger legacy canisters. Together with the HI-STAR 100MB, the Holtec transportation systems will supply safe transport for spent fuel from nuclear power plants across the U.S. The spent fuel can be transported to Holtec’s interim HI-STORE CIS or to a repository, if one is available. Holtec says that other nations that use nuclear power such as China are interested in the HI-STAR 100MB system.