The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1429 – Standford University And The University Of British Columbia Collaborate On A Study Of Costs Of Small Modular Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1429 – Standford University And The University Of British Columbia Collaborate On A Study Of Costs Of Small Modular Reactors – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         Small modular reactors (SMR) have long been touted as the future of nuclear energy. However, they will actually generate more radioactive waste than conventional nuclear power plants. This was found during research at Stanford and the University of British Columbia.
         Nuclear reactors generate electricity with limited greenhouse gas emissions. A nuclear power plant that generates one gigawatt of electricity also produces radioactive waste that must be isolated from the environment for hundreds of thousands of years. In addition, the cost of constructing a large nuclear power plant can be tens of billions of dollars.
         To address these challenges, the nuclear industry is developing SMRs that generate less than three hundred megawatts of electric power. SMRs are about one tenth to one quarter the size of a traditional nuclear energy plant due to compact, simplified designs.  They can be assembled in factories. Industry analysts say that these advanced modular designs will be cheaper and produce less radioactive waste than conventional large-scale reactors. However, a study published on May 31 of this year in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has reached the opposite conclusion.

        Lindsay Krall is a scientist at the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company and lead author of the study. She said, “Our results show that most small modular reactor designs will actually increase the volume of nuclear waste in need of management and disposal, by factors of 2 to 30 for the reactors in our case study. These findings stand in sharp contrast to the cost and waste reduction benefits that advocates have claimed for advanced nuclear technologies.”
         About four hundred and forty commercial nuclear reactors currently operate globally. They provide approximately ten percent of the world’s electricity. In the U.S., ninety-three nuclear reactors generate about a fifth of the country’s electricity supply.
         Unlike power plants that run on coal or natural gas, nuclear plants emit little carbon dioxide which is a major cause of global warming. Nuclear advocates say that as global demand for clean energy increases, more nuclear power will be needed to minimize the effects of climate change.
         However, nuclear energy is not risk free. In the U.S., commercial nuclear power plants have produced more than eighty-eight metric tons of spent nuclear fuel, as well as substantial volumes of intermediate and low-level radioactive waste. The most highly radioactive waste is mainly spent fuel. It will have to be isolated in deep-mined geologic repositories for hundreds of thousands of years. Currently, the U.S. has no program to develop a geologic repository, after spending decades and billions of dollars on the Yucca Mountain site in Nevada. Spent nuclear fuel is currently stored in pools or in dry casks at reactor sites. It is accumulating at a rate of about 2,000 metric tons per year.
         Some nuclear analysts claim that SMRs will significantly reduce the mass of spent nuclear fuel generated compared to much larger, conventional nuclear reactors. Other analysts say that conclusion is overly optimistic, including Krall and her colleagues.
         Krall said, “Simple metrics, such as estimates of the mass of spent fuel, offer little insight into the resources that will be required to store, package, and dispose of the spent fuel and other radioactive. In fact, remarkably few studies have analyzed the management and disposal of nuclear waste streams from SMR.”
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Sep 26, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Sep 26, 2024

    Ambient office = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 82 – China May Soon Surpass The U.S. In Funding Fusion Research – Part 3 of 3 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 82 – China May Soon Surpass The U.S. In Funding Fusion Research – Part 3 of 3 Parts

    Part 3 of 3 Parts (Please read Parts 1 and 2 first)
         In the early 1950s, the U.S. military tested a series of nuclear weapons in the Pacific Ocean that were “boosted” by gases that created a fusion reaction. This resulted in explosions that were seven hundred times more powerful than the Hiroshima blast.
         Sustaining nuclear fusion for long periods is much more challenging than using it in nuclear weapons. While China races ahead with its tokamaks, the U.S. is finding an edge in other technology such as lasers.
         In late 2022, scientists at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California shot nearly two hundred lasers at a cylinder holding a fuel capsule the size of a currant, in the world’s first successful experiment to generate a net gain of fusion energy. This indicates that more power came out of the process than was used to heat the capsule (though they didn’t count the energy needed to power the lasers).
         There are additional ways to achieve nuclear fusion, and the U.S. is hedging its bets with research on a variety of technologies. It is definitely possible that this approach could pay off.
         Melanie Windridge is a U.K.-based plasma physicist and CEO of Fusion Energy Insights, an industry monitoring organization. She said that “We don’t know exactly which is going to be the best concept, and it may not be one.” There may ultimately be several viable approaches for fusion power, she told an interviewer. “And then it will come down to costs and other factors in the longer term.”
         Windridge said that the tokamak is the best-researched concept. “Over time, it’s had the most research put into it, so it’s the most advanced in terms of the physics. And a lot of the private companies are building on that.”
         With all the money China is putting into research, the tokamak technology is rapidly evolving. China’s EAST tokamak in Hefei held plasma stable at seventy million degrees Celsius which is five times hotter than the core of the sun for more than seventeen minutes. This represents a world record and an objectively astonishing breakthrough.
         Mikhail Maslov is with the U.K. Atomic Energy Authority. He described the Chinese breakthrough as an “important milestone,” adding that running long plasma pulses remains one of the biggest technical challenges to commercializing fusion energy.
         While China’s government pours money into fusion, research in the U.S. has attracted far more private investment. Globally, the private sector has spent seven billion dollars on fusion in the last three to four years, eighty percent of which has been by U.S. companies, according to Allain.
         Allain said that “In the U.S., what you have is that entrepreneurial spirit of being able to really think outside the box and innovate and really address some of these gaps, not just in science, but also in the technology.”
         However, if the Chinese government continues to invest more than one billion a year, that could soon eclipse U.S. spending on fusion research, even in the private sector. And if those fusion investments pay off, colorful celebrations in Shanghai will not only be powered by fusion, but they will also cast China in a whole new light.

  • Geiger Readings for Sep 25, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Sep 25, 2024

    Ambient office = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Corn from Central Market = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 81 – China May Soon Surpass The U.S. In Funding Fusion Research – Part 2 of 3 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 81 – China May Soon Surpass The U.S. In Funding Fusion Research – Part 2 of 3 Parts

    Part 2 of 3 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         Utilizing high temperature superconduction, the ES magnets are more powerful than the copper ones used in older tokamaks. According to MIT scientists researching the same technology, they permit smaller tokamaks that can generate as much fusion energy as larger ones, and they can better confine plasma.
         The company is planning to build a second-generation tokamak to prove its methods are commercially viable by 2027. It expects a third-generation device that can feed power to the grid before 2035.
        Andrew Holland is the CEO of the Washington, D.C.-based Fusion Industry Association. He said that in contrast, the tokamaks in the U.S. are aging. As a result, the U.S. researchers have to rely on allies’ machines in Japan, Europe and the UK to further its research.
         Holland discussed a new five hundred and seventy million dollars fusion research park in eastern China under construction, called CRAFT, on track to be completed next year.
         Holland continued, “We don’t have anything like that. The Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory has been upgrading its tokamak for ten years now. The other operating tokamak in the U.S., the DIII-D, is a thirty-year-old machine. There are no modern fusion facilities at American national labs.”
         There is a growing unease in the U.S. nuclear industry that China is beating America at its own game. Some of the next-generation tokamaks China has built, or plans to, are essentially “copies” of U.S. designs. They use components that resemble those made in the U.S.
         Holland said that China’s state-funded BEST tokamak, which is expected to be completed in 2027, is a copy of one designed by Commonwealth Fusion Systems, a company in Massachusetts working with MIT. The two designs incorporate the same kind of advanced magnets ES is using. Another machine being built by a private Chinese company appears to be very similar to one designed by the U.S. company Helion. He added that there is “a long history” of China copying American tech.
         Holland continued that “They’re fast followers and then take the lead by dominating the supply chain.” Using solar panel technology as an example he added that “We’re aware of this and want to make sure that’s not the way it goes forward.”
         The China’s National Energy Administration was asked whether state-funded fusion research had copied or been inspired by U.S. designs. They have not replied to yet to the inquiry.    
         Nuclear fusion is a highly complex process that involves forcing together two nuclei that would normally repel each other. One way to do that is to increase temperatures in a tokamak to the tune of one hundred and fifty million degrees Celsius. That is ten times the temperature of the sun’s core. When they bind, the nuclei release a huge amount of energy as heat, which can then be used to turn steam turbines and generate power.
         The U.S. has been a fusion leader for decades. It was the first nation to apply fusion energy in the real world — in a hydrogen bomb.
    Please read Part 3 next

  • Geiger Readings for Sep 24, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Sep 24, 2024

    Ambient office = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 80 – China May Soon Surpass The U.S. In Funding Fusion Research – Part 1 of 3 Parts

    Nuclear Fusion 80 – China May Soon Surpass The U.S. In Funding Fusion Research – Part 1 of 3 Parts

    Part 1 of 3 Parts

         The bustling city of Shanghai marks national celebrations with world-famous light shows, illuminating its skyscrapers with dazzling colors, like beacons of Chinese innovation.
         It is here that scientists and engineers work tirelessly to pursue the next big thing in global tech, from 6G internet and advanced AI to next-generation robotics. It is also here, on an unassuming downtown street, a new small start-up called Energy Singularity (ES) is working on something extraordinary. ES has entered the hot field of nuclear fusion energy research.
         U.S. companies and industry experts are concerned that America is losing its decades-long lead in the race to master this near-limitless form of clean energy. New fusion companies sprout across China, and Beijing outspends D.C.
         Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the sun and other stars. It is extremely difficult to replicate on Earth. Many countries have achieved fusion reactions. However, sustaining them for long enough to use in the real world remains elusive. Mastering nuclear fusion is an enticing prospect that promises wealth and global influence to whichever nation tames it first.
         The most important aspect of fusion energy is its sheer efficiency. A controlled fusion reaction releases around four million times more energy than burning coal, oil or gas. It is also four times more efficient than nuclear fission, the kind of nuclear energy used today. It won’t be developed in time to fight climate change in this crucial decade. However, it could be the solution to future warming.
         Jean Paul Allain leads the U.S. Energy Department’s Office of Fusion Energy Sciences. He said that the Chinese government is pouring money into the venture, putting one billion to one and a half billion dollars annually into fusion. In comparison, the Biden administration has funded fusion research with around eight hundred million dollars a year. Allain added, “To me, what’s more important than the number, it’s actually how fast they’re doing this”.
         Private companies in both countries are optimistic, saying they can get fusion power on the grid by the mid-2030s. However, enormous technical challenges still remain.
         The U.S. was among the world’s first country to move on fusion research in earnest since the early 1950s. China’s entry into fusion research came later that decade. More recently, the pace of fusion research has accelerated. Since 2015, China’s fusion patents have surged, Now it has more patents than any other country, according to industry data published by Nikkei.
         Energy Singularity, the start-up in Shanghai, is one example of China’s accelerating fusion research. It built its own tokamak in the three years since it was established, which is faster than any comparable reactor that has ever been built. A tokamak is a highly complex cylindrical or donut-shaped machine that subjects hydrogen to extreme temperatures and pressures, forming a soup-like plasma in which the nuclear fusion reaction occurs.
         For a fledgling company working on one of the world’s most difficult physics challenges, ES is incredibly optimistic, and it has reason to be. It has received more than one hundred and twelve million dollars in private investment. It has also achieved a world first. Its current tokamak is the only one in the world to have used advanced magnets in a plasma experiment.
    Please read Part 2 next