The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 18, 2019

    Geiger Readings for Apr 18, 2019

    Ambient office  =  87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 167 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 168 nanosieverts per hour

    Carrot from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 379 – The Seawolf-class Is The Most Advanced Nuclear Submarine In the U.S. Arsenal – Part 2 of 2 Parts.

    Nuclear Weapons 379 – The Seawolf-class Is The Most Advanced Nuclear Submarine In the U.S. Arsenal – Part 2 of 2 Parts.

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
            The Seawolf-class submarines were designed to be stealthier, more heavily armed and able to match the speed and maneuverability of any adversary. As might be expected, these features did not come cheap. The initial cost estimate was thirty-three billion dollars to construct twelve of the new design. In 2018 dollars, the cost would be about five billion dollars per submarine which is three times the cost of one Los Angeles-class sub. It turned out that the HY-100 steel was prone to extensive weld-cracking problems which required massive reconstruction.
            Soon after the construction of the Seawolf class of subs began, the Soviet Union fell apart. The Soviet subs were docked and rusting and the massive investment of the U.S. in new expensive powerful subs was called into question. The initial Seawolf-class order was reduced from twelve to three. The Seawolf, the Connecticut and the Jimmy Carter were launched between 1995 and 2004. All three of these new subs are based at the Kitsap-Bangor Naval Base in Washington State.
           The Jimmy Carter was modified at an additional cost of more than eight hundred and eighty million dollars. It was made about a hundred feet longer. This was done in order to add a special Multi-Mission Platform which can carry divers or manned or unmanned underwater reconnaissance vehicles which can be deployed through special locks in the hull. The Jimmy Carter also has special thrusters that will allow it to maneuver precisely in dangerous shallow waters or ocean floors. And, finally, it carries special instruments that will allow it to tap undersea cables that carry the Internet and other long-distance communication travel.
          The missions of the Jimmy Carter remain secret. It has received multiple unit citations for unreported reasons which indicate that it has been busy. It has been reported that the Jimmy Carter deployed an aerial drone to spy on North Korean coastal artillery.
           All of the Seawolf-class subs activities have been kept secret. There have been very few pictures or articles relating to the new class of subs made available to the public. There have been reports that the subs have been traveling under the ice covering the Arctic Ocean. Some of these trips have been used to test special sonar and communication equipment. None of the Seawolf-class subs has been engaged in any combat operations.
          The Virginia-class subs being built now are cheaper than the Seawolf-class at one billion eight hundred million dollars each. They do not have some of the bulk and specials fittings of the Seawolf-class, but they do make use of some of the advanced technology on the Seawolf-class. They have stealth pump water jets for propulsions. Some of the latest Virginia-class subs have vertical launch cells for rapid land-attacks.
           The Seawolf-class may see its numbers rise as a new underwater arms races has risen between the U.S., Russia and China. China will soon have a bigger fleet but many of their subs are short range diesel subs and even their nuclear subs are much noisier than the Virginia and Seawolf-classes. Russia is developing enhanced successors to their Akula and Borei-classes of subs.

  • Nuclear News Roundup Apr 17, 2019

    The reactor core of Darlington 2 in Canada has now been rebuilt, owner and operator Ontario Power Generation (OPG) has announced, celebrating the installation of all its fuel channels. It is the first in a programme of ten reactor refurbishments. World-nuclear-news.org

    Holtec International said Tuesday it aims to buy a fourth nuclear power plant that is on the verge of retirement, the Indian Point Energy Center in upstate New York. Exchangemonitor.com

    State lawmakers are considering giving out roughly half-a-billion dollars a year in subsidies Pennsylvania’s nuclear power industry. So, how much would that cost you? Witf.org

    The Legislature is considering a measure that outlines how North Dakota would respond if the federal government were to designate parts of the state as dumping sites for nuclear waste. Sfchronicle.com

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
            The Seawolf-class submarines were designed to be stealthier, more heavily armed and able to match the speed and maneuverability of any adversary. As might be expected, these features did not come cheap. The initial cost estimate was thirty-three billion dollars to construct twelve of the new design. In 2018 dollars, the cost would be about five billion dollars per submarine which is three times the cost of one Los Angeles-class sub. It turned out that the HY-100 steel was prone to extensive weld-cracking problems which required massive reconstruction.
            Soon after the construction of the Seawolf class of subs began, the Soviet Union fell apart. The Soviet subs were docked and rusting and the massive investment of the U.S. in new expensive powerful subs was called into question. The initial Seawolf-class order was reduced from twelve to three. The Seawolf, the Connecticut and the Jimmy Carter were launched between 1995 and 2004. All three of these new subs are based at the Kitsap-Bangor Naval Base in Washington State.
           The Jimmy Carter was modified at an additional cost of more than eight hundred and eighty million dollars. It was made about a hundred feet longer. This was done in order to add a special Multi-Mission Platform which can carry divers or manned or unmanned underwater reconnaissance vehicles which can be deployed through special locks in the hull. The Jimmy Carter also has special thrusters that will allow it to maneuver precisely in dangerous shallow waters or ocean floors. And, finally, it carries special instruments that will allow it to tap undersea cables that carry the Internet and other long-distance communication travel.
          The missions of the Jimmy Carter remain secret. It has received multiple unit citations for unreported reasons which indicate that it has been busy. It has been reported that the Jimmy Carter deployed an aerial drone to spy on North Korean coastal artillery.
           All of the Seawolf-class subs activities have been kept secret. There have been very few pictures or articles relating to the new class of subs made available to the public. There have been reports that the subs have been traveling under the ice covering the Arctic Ocean. Some of these trips have been used to test special sonar and communication equipment. None of the Seawolf-class subs has been engaged in any combat operations.
          The Virginia-class subs being built now are cheaper than the Seawolf-class at one billion eight hundred million dollars each. They do not have some of the bulk and specials fittings of the Seawolf-class, but they do make use of some of the advanced technology on the Seawolf-class. They have stealth pump water jets for propulsions. Some of the latest Virginia-class subs have vertical launch cells for rapid land-attacks.
           The Seawolf-class may see its numbers rise as a new underwater arms races has risen between the U.S., Russia and China. China will soon have a bigger fleet but many of their subs are short range diesel subs and even their nuclear subs are much noisier than the Virginia and Seawolf-classes. Russia is developing enhanced successors to their Akula and Borei-classes of subs.

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 17, 2019

    Geiger Readings for Apr 17, 2019

    Ambient office  =  84 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 72 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 70 nanosieverts per hour

    Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 76 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 56 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 378 – The Seawolf-class Is The Most Advanced Nuclear Submarine In the U.S. Arsenal – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Weapons 378 – The Seawolf-class Is The Most Advanced Nuclear Submarine In the U.S. Arsenal – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
                  I have blogged about nuclear submarines in the arsenals of nuclear-armed nations before. The Chinese, Russians, U.K, France, the U.S., Pakistan and India all have nuclear submarines that can launch nuclear-tipped missiles. These constitute a leg of what is called the nuclear triad. The other two legs are nuclear bombers and ICBM with nuclear warheads. The nuclear submarines are seen as providing the ultimate retaliation capability if the other two legs of the nuclear triad have been destroyed by an enemy. Today, I am going to talk about the most advanced nuclear submarine possessed by the U.S. Navy.
            By the late 1950s, the Soviet navy had nuclear powered submarines that could reach twice the maximum depth of most of the U.S. subs. Often the Soviet subs had a higher maximum speed. However, despite these advantages, they had a very significant disadvantage against U.S. subs. The Soviet subs were a lot noisier.
            U.S. subs were able to easily detect and trail Soviet subs from a distance that made the U.S. subs undetectable by the Soviet subs. However, by the 1980s, the Soviets were improving their acoustic stealth technology. The Soviet Navy had acquired propeller-milling technology from Toshiba and Kongsberg companies. This allowed the Soviets to create a much quieter seven bladed propeller on their new Akula-class subs.
           The Pentagon concluded that the Akula-class subs had superior specification to most of the Los Angles-class subs that constituted the majority of operational U.S. subs. In 1983, the U.S. began development of the biggest, fastest, and quietest attack submarine they could imagine to regain U.S. superiority over Soviet Subs.
            The construction of the U.S.S. Seawolf began at Electric Boats in October of 1989. It would be about three hundred and fifty feet long which is more than a football field and displace over nine thousand tons when submerged. The Los Angeles-class subs carried thirty seven torpedoes in four tubes.  The Seawolf was armed with fifty heavy-weight 533-millimeter Mark 48 torpedoes or Harpoon anti-ship missiles. These could be launched from eight extra-large 660 mm torpedo tubes. Surface-attack Tomahawk missiles could also be launched from these tubes.
            The Seawolf-class of subs is made of a special high strength steel called HY-100. Its conning tower is reinforced so it can cope with operations in Arctic Ice. The S6W pressurized water reactor gives the Seawolf-class an incredible forty miles per hour top speed that allow it to chase down any sub currently in the arsenal of any other country.
           The most important advanced technology incorporated in the Seawolf-class involved acoustic stealth. The Seawolf-class generates one tenth of the noise of the quietest Los Angeles-class subs. The Seawolf-class generates about ninety-five decibels in the ocean where the background noise is ninety decibels.
            In addition, the Seawolf-class utilizes a jet propulsion pump system instead of the standard propellers that powered the Los Angeles-class. This means that the Seawolf-class can maintain its super quiet operation even traveling at twenty-three miles per hour which is much faster than other subs could travel while remaining in stealth mode.
            The Seawolf-class has a twenty-four-foot diameter spherical sonar array on its bow. It also has wide-aperture flank arrays and can tow TB-16D and TB-29 sonar arrays. The information gained by these sensors is fed to the BSY-2 combat system on the Seawolf-class. The Seawolf-class can engage multiple targets simultaneously with their Mark 48 torpedoes. The Mark 48 can be guided by wire from the sub or with their own sonar.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 16, 2019

    Geiger Readings for Apr 16, 2019

    Ambient office  =  80 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 116 nanosieverts per hour

    Bartlett pear from Central Market = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 134 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 124 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 672 – China Has Decided To Use Their Own Hualong One Reactor Design To Expand Their Nuclear Reactor Fleet

    Nuclear Reactors 672 – China Has Decided To Use Their Own Hualong One Reactor Design To Expand Their Nuclear Reactor Fleet

           China has been a strong proponent of nuclear power. They have announced ambitious programs to build and operate many new nuclear power reactors to feed their growing economy with the electricity it needs. However, the 2011 Fukushima disaster had a serious impact on their ambitious building program. Now after a few years of scaled back activities, the Chinese are again moving forward with plans for the construction of many new reactors.
           For a long time, foreign manufacturers of nuclear power reactors saw China as a great place to build their new designs for display to potential buyers. Chinese plans included their intention to build new reactors based on designs from France, the U.S. and Canada.
           In 2006, China and the U.S. signed a technology transfer agreement that made the new Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear power reactor the design of choice for China’s nuclear ambitions. China also announced that advanced third generation technology would be used as a result of safety reviews carried out after the Fukushima disaster.
           By the time that the AP1000 and the EPR reactors were finished and ready to be brought online in China after schedule delays and cost overruns, the new Chinese Hualong One home-grown reactor design appears to be as viable as those foreign designs. China has not yet completed its first Hualong One reactor but they express great confidence that it will not suffer construction delays and will be able to compete with foreign designs on cost and safety.
           China has decided to construct a Hualong One as its first new reactor project in almost three years. Construction will begin at a site in Zhangzhou later this year. The Zhangzhou site was originally going to host an AP1000 reactor.
           Li Ning is a nuclear scientist and dean of the College of Energy at Xiamen University. He said, “The problem with AP1000 – the delays, the design changes, the supply chain issues and then the trade problems – has forced their hand, and it has become Hualong.” He also remarked that the licensing procedures in China would be a big advantage for the Hualong One.  He said, “For the Hualong, there are four reactors already under construction and one of them is near completion already. It is a Chinese design so it wouldn’t be very hard to license the next four.”
            EDF, the state-run utility in France, assisted in the construction of the EPR project in Guangdong province. They have declined to comment on the change in China’s nuclear design choice. Westinghouse, which has undergone bankruptcy since the technology transfer deal was inked, also did not respond with respect to Chinese plans.
          China has not just selected the Hualong One design for domestic use. They also have serious ambitions to sell Hualong Ones to foreign customers. Currently, the Chinse are constructing a Hualong One project in Pakistan, The Hualong One is also a contender for nuclear projects in Argentina and Britain.
          Li Xioming is the assistant general manager of the state ownded China National Nuclear Corporation. (CNNC). He recently said, “The technologies are now just about the same as those of the United States, France and Russia. This is the foundation that we will rely on for our future survival and our international competitiveness.”
           “China has already become one of the small number of countries that has independently mastered third-generation nuclear power technology, and it has the conditions and comparative advantages to scale up and go into mass production,” he said at an industry conference.