The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for May 01, 2019

    Geiger Readings for May 01, 2019

    Ambient office  = 114 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Red bell pepper from Central Market = 135 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 112 nanosieverts per hour

    Filtered water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 375 – Uranium Cube From Hitler’s Nuclear Research Surfaces

    Nuclear Weapons 375 – Uranium Cube From Hitler’s Nuclear Research Surfaces

           It is well known that Hitler’s Third Reich was working on the development of nuclear weapons during the World War II. At the end of the war more than six hundred small uranium cubes were confiscated by Allied forces from one research laboratory. They were shipped to the United States where they were scattered to public and private collections.
           Timothy Koeth is a physicist at the University of Maryland at College Park. He is a collector of World War II memorabilia, including some artifacts relating to nuclear weapons research. In 2013, he received a small metal cube from a mysterious source. The cube was about two inches on a side. It was wrapped in a piece of paper which had writing on it. The writing said “Taken from the reactor that Hitler tried to build. Gift of Ninninger.”
           Koeth decide that the cube was from the cache of German uranium cubes that had be confiscated at the end of the war. The surface of the cube was pockmarked with bubbles. This indicated that it had be created with primitive technology such as that available to the Germans during the War. The name “Ninninger” on the piece of paper was another clue to its origins. It turned out that the name was probably a misspelling of “Nininger,” the last name of Robert Nininger who had been involved in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. project to develop a atomic bomb for use in World War II. The widow of Nininger told Koeth that her husband did, in fact, own a small cube of German uranium which he eventually gave to a friend. Koeth believes that the cube was passed along by several people until it was ultimately was passed to him. There was no danger from radioactivity to the people who handled the cube.
          Most nuclear reactors today are fueled with uranium in which the ratio of U-235 to U-238 has been raised to at least five percent. It is known that the Germans were trying to develop a nuclear reactor with naturally occurring uranium which is mostly U-238. When Koeth tested the cube, it turned out to be emitting gamma rays consistent with naturally occurring uranium. Additional tests indicated that the cube had never been a part of a working reactor. If the cube had been in a functional reactor, it would have contained cesium-137 but none was detected.
          Computer models of possible German nuclear reactor designs suggested that German cache of six hundred and sixty-four cubes of uranium were not sufficient to create a working nuclear reactor. In order to create a self-sustaining nuclear reaction, what is called a “critical mass” must be assembled. It turns out that the Germans would have needed hundreds of addition uranium cubes in order to achieve the necessary critical mass. Records from World War II show that there was another German nuclear research group that had four hundred of the uranium cubes. It was only the competition of the two German research groups that prevented them from assembling enough cubes to actually make a nuclear reactor. It would have taken a great deal of additional work to actually produce an atomic bomb.
           Koeth displays the cube as part of his World War II memorabilia collection. He intends to give it to a museum at some point. It is fortunate that Hitler never obtained an atomic bomb because he had missiles that could have delivered such bombs to his enemies. This could have changed the outcome of World War II and the world would be much different today.

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 30, 2019

    Geiger Readings for Apr 30, 2019

    Ambient office  =  66 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 120 nanosieverts per hour

    Carrot from Central Market = 127 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Filtered water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 374 – Some Defense Analysts Say That We Should Abandon Our Fleet Of Minuteman Missiles

    Nuclear Weapons 374 – Some Defense Analysts Say That We Should Abandon Our Fleet Of Minuteman Missiles

            The U.S. government is planning on modernization and expansion of our nuclear forces in response to the behavior of Russia in the past few years. Having three quarters of a trillion dollars this year allocated to the defense budget has encouraged the Pentagon to throw a lot of money at a variety of old and new weapons systems. I have mentioned the nuclear triad before which consists of ICBMs, nuclear armed submarines and nuclear bombers.
           The Department of Defense projected recently that three hundred and twenty-five billion dollars on modernization of the U.S. nuclear forces thru 2026. However, with current estimations for new programs rising in cost and new programs being discussed, it is likely that this estimate will fall far short of needed funds for Pentagon plans. The needed funds to maintain current and future weapons systems being planned will tax the Pentagon budget, especially if there is a turn down in the economy. Some defense analysts believe that it is time to rethink one leg of the nuclear triad.
           The U.S. has six hundred and seventy-eight Minuteman III ICBMs currently in service. At any given time, there are four hundred Minuteman missiles operationally deployed. The function of this missile fleet as a nuclear deterrent is not so much as an attack force but rather a retaliation force that the Russians would need to destroy if they attacked us. This would require them to spend a lot of missiles attacking the Minuteman installations scattered across the center of the nation which could have been used to attack other targets. The bunkers that house the Minutemen are hardened against nuclear attack and would probably require multiple direct hits by Russian missiles to reliably destroy. The nickname for the Minutemen fleet is a U.S. “nuclear sponge.”
          While there is an abstract logic to this idea of a nuclear sponge, the truth is that it invites a massive attack with hundreds of nuclear warheads on the center of the country where a great deal of our food is grown. Such an attack would cause horrendous devastation and the fallout and refugees would spread quick to the rest of the country.  The entire global weather system would undergo huge changes that might spell the end of human civilization. Many defense analysts question the actual deterrence value of the U.S. Minuteman fleet.
           The U.S. Minuteman fleet of deployed missiles is currently targeted at the open ocean just in case there is an accidental launch. Considering the time and complexity of retargeting these missiles reinforces the suggestion that these missiles are just there to be draw enemy warheads.
           There are plans for replacing the Minuteman III missiles with new missiles. The reuse of the Minuteman infrastructure will help reduce costs. However, the current estimate for a single new Minuteman replacement is one hundred billion dollars but that price appears to be to low and estimates are already rising. The Pentagon says that competition should bring the price per missile down and the new missiles will be cheaper to maintain but that may not turn out to be the case. The forty trillion-dollar price tag to replace the Minutemen is just too high.
          The money saved by eliminating the ICBM leg of the nuclear triad could be applied to the B-21 Raider Stealth Bomber program and the Columbia class nuclear ballistic submarine program. Both of these programs are more flexible and potentially effective in a conflict than the Minutemen.

  • Nuclear Weapons 374 – Some Defense Analysts Say That We Should Abandon Our Fleet Of Minuteman Missiles

    Nuclear Weapons 374 – Some Defense Analysts Say That We Should Abandon Our Fleet Of Minuteman Missiles

            The U.S. government is planning on modernization and expansion of our nuclear forces in response to the behavior of Russia in the past few years. Having three quarters of a trillion dollars this year allocated to the defense budget has encouraged the Pentagon to throw a lot of money at a variety of old and new weapons systems. I have mentioned the nuclear triad before which consists of ICBMs, nuclear armed submarines and nuclear bombers.
           The Department of Defense projected recently that three hundred and twenty-five billion dollars on modernization of the U.S. nuclear forces thru 2026. However, with current estimations for new programs rising in cost and new programs being discussed, it is likely that this estimate will fall far short of needed funds for Pentagon plans. The needed funds to maintain current and future weapons systems being planned will tax the Pentagon budget, especially if there is a turn down in the economy. Some defense analysts believe that it is time to rethink one leg of the nuclear triad.
           The U.S. has six hundred and seventy-eight Minuteman III ICBMs currently in service. At any given time, there are four hundred Minuteman missiles operationally deployed. The function of this missile fleet as a nuclear deterrent is not so much as an attack force but rather a retaliation force that the Russians would need to destroy if they attacked us. This would require them to spend a lot of missiles attacking the Minuteman installations scattered across the center of the nation which could have been used to attack other targets. The bunkers that house the Minutemen are hardened against nuclear attack and would probably require multiple direct hits by Russian missiles to reliably destroy. The nickname for the Minutemen fleet is a U.S. “nuclear sponge.”
          While there is an abstract logic to this idea of a nuclear sponge, the truth is that it invites a massive attack with hundreds of nuclear warheads on the center of the country where a great deal of our food is grown. Such an attack would cause horrendous devastation and the fallout and refugees would spread quick to the rest of the country.  The entire global weather system would undergo huge changes that might spell the end of human civilization. Many defense analysts question the actual deterrence value of the U.S. Minuteman fleet.
           The U.S. Minuteman fleet of deployed missiles is currently targeted at the open ocean just in case there is an accidental launch. Considering the time and complexity of retargeting these missiles reinforces the suggestion that these missiles are just there to be draw enemy warheads.
           There are plans for replacing the Minuteman III missiles with new missiles. The reuse of the Minuteman infrastructure will help reduce costs. However, the current estimate for a single new Minuteman replacement is one hundred billion dollars but that price appears to be to low and estimates are already rising. The Pentagon says that competition should bring the price per missile down and the new missiles will be cheaper to maintain but that may not turn out to be the case. The forty trillion-dollar price tag to replace the Minutemen is just too high.
          The money saved by eliminating the ICBM leg of the nuclear triad could be applied to the B-21 Raider Stealth Bomber program and the Columbia class nuclear ballistic submarine program. Both of these programs are more flexible and potentially effective in a conflict than the Minutemen.

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 29, 2019

    Geiger Readings for Apr 29, 2019

    Ambient office  =  89 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Filtered water = 69 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 28, 2019

    Geiger Readings for Apr 28, 2019

    Ambient office  =  87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Bartlett pear from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 101 nanosieverts per hour

    Filtered water = 90 nanosieverts per hour