The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Gov. Lee Announces Orano USA Seeks To Locate Uranium Enrichment Operations in Oak Ridge tn.gov
Kazakhstan to Decide on Nuclear Power Plant Construction in Referendum Caspian.com
Kazakhstan to Decide on Nuclear Power Plant Construction in Referendum – Caspian News search.yahoo.com
US regulator issues environmental assessment for two-unit test reactor world-nuclear-news.org
Ambient office = 52 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 93 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 96 nanosieverts per hour
Jalapeno from Central Market = 72 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 89 nanosieverts per hour
Nuclear fusion research is rapidly expanding in the U.S. and across the globe. One of the important issues with respect to the magnetic confinement approach is how to accurately measure the actual power produced by a fusion reactor.
Currently, magnetic confinement fusion devices such as tokamaks and stellarators rely completely on absolute neutron counting as a direct way of measuring fusion power.
Fusion researchers say, “This technique presents several difficulties: the emission and the transport of neutrons from an extended source like the tokamak, and their interaction with reactor materials, require the use of complicated simulation codes, as well as long and costly calibration campaigns to validate the codes.”
Researchers have developed a groundbreaking new method for measuring power in nuclear fusion reactors. They have discovered that gamma rays which are produced during the deuterium-tritium nuclear reaction, can serve as a highly accurate and alternative means of measuring the power output of new fusion reactors.
The new method makes use of the gamma-ray-to-neutron branching ratio in the deuterium-tritium reaction, a measurement that was previously unidentified. The researchers have found a way to count the rare gamma rays emitted during a fusion reaction. By counting the gamma rays emitted during a fusion reaction, researchers can now obtain valuable information about fusion power, independent of traditional neutron counting techniques.
The research team explained that “Absolute counting of deuterium-tritium gamma rays could provide the secondary neutron-independent technique required for the validation of scientific results and as a licensing tool for future power plants.” This novel method involves the precise measurement of two particular gamma rays with energies around thirteen million electron volts and seventeen million electron volts.
Marica Rebai is a researcher at Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR-ISTP) and an author of the study. She said, “From this measurement, never before carried out with sufficient accuracy, it was possible to determine the energies and relative intensities with which the two gamma rays are emitted. This gamma ray emission process has a relative probability (called branching ratio) which is much lower than that of fourteen million electron volts neutron emission.”
Andrea Dal Molin and Davide Rigamonti led another study on the same subject. They said that this work enabled them to find that one gamma ray is emitted for every forty-two thousand fourteen million electron volts produced.
Dal Molin and Rigomonti added that “It paves the way for the use of absolute gamma-ray measurement as a new alternative and complementary method to neutron measurements for determining the power achieved in new fusion reactors based on the deuterium-tritium reaction, such as ITER and SPARC”.
The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) is a global collaborative effort focused on proving the viability of fusion power. It requires two independent methods for precisely measuring the power it generates.
Marco Tardocchi is a research director at CNR-ISTP. He said that “Until now, the absence of a direct and alternative method to absolute neutron counting has been an obstacle to the independent validation of results obtained from ongoing experiments and the authorization of future commercial plants.”
Ukraine Cuts Output at Nuclear Plant After Russian Attacks usnews.com
Westinghouse Unveils Pioneering Nuclear Generative AI System businesswire.com
Energoatom denies accident at South Ukraine Nuclear Power Plant but says ‘issues’ found kyivindependent.com
China pledges to encourage investment in Nigeria reuters.com
Ambient office = 66 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 104 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 107 nanosieverts per hour
Heirloom tomato from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 102 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 87 nanosieverts per hour
The U.S. Air Force “underestimated” the complexity of building a sprawling network of launch centers and other ground infrastructure for its next nuclear missile. This led to severe projected cost overruns, the service’s acquisition chief said Wednesday.
Most of the Air Force’s and industry’s attention was initially focused on the missile portion of the LGM-35A Sentinel intercontinental ballistic missile. Andrew Hunter is the Air Force’s assistant secretary for acquisition, technology and logistics. He said at the Defense News Conference in Arlington, Virginia, on Wednesday that the Air Force “really neglected the complexity of the ground infrastructure.”
The Air Force wants to replace its arsenal of four hundred and fifty ageing Minuteman III nuclear missiles. The Minuteman III program is nearing the end of its life, with the Northrop Grumman-made Sentinel. Sentinel’s replacement includes building new launch control centers across the Plains region, refurbishing existing silos for the new missiles and replacing about seventy-five hundred miles of copper cable connecting the facilities with modern fiber optics. The projected future costs of have skyrocketed.
The Pentagon originally expected to spend seventy-seven billion seven hundred million dollars on Sentinel. However, the program is now likely to cost about one hundred and sixty billion dollars if it stays on its current course. The projected cost overruns alarmed lawmakers and Pentagon officials and triggered an event known as a critical Nunn-McCurdy breach.
After a review announced in July, the military decided that the Sentinel was too important to cancel but must be restructured to bring those costs back down. But the Pentagon said even a “reasonably modified” version would still probably cost one hundred and forty billion dollars which amounts to an eighty-one percent more than the original estimate.
Jim Slife is the Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force. He said that the Air Force is now going “line by line” through Sentinel’s funding requirements to look for places to reduce its costs. He added that the “exhaustive” process will take months.
Slife said, “The undersecretary (Melissa Dalton), Mr. Hunter’s team and I are deeply, deeply involved in looking at our requirements (and) making sure that we revalidate all the requirements.” The Air Force needs to “trace every single one of them back to either presidential guidance, or departmental guidance for things like safety, security, surety, survivability — all the things that are needed in a system that you’re going to rely on to keep the nation safe. Slife added that finding places to cut costs is challenging. Sentinel’s top-level requirements were fairly straightforward.
Silfe continued that the “derived requirements” that spell out how Sentinel will do its job “actually can become problematic.” Those can include spelling out how many facilities will be needed to carry out Sentinel’s mission and how much concrete those facilities will need to consume and how large a workforce they will require.
The Air Force has not constructed a new ICBM and accompanying infrastructure since the Minuteman III which was deployed in the early 1970s.And because it has been so long since the Air Force undertook a major acquisition of this scale, Hunter said, the Air Force underestimated Sentinel’s complexity. “We’re having to relearn some of those skills and up our game.” The “striking” complexity of Sentinel’s ground infrastructure is crucial to making the ICBM system an effective nuclear deterrent.
Hunter added that “We have to have a missile where we can respond instantly, at all times, without fail, and in the context of the highest of high-intensity conflicts, a potential nuclear exchange. And we ask our ground infrastructure to provide most of those capabilities. The missile is only a small piece of that puzzle.” The Air Force also has to “bring a lot more engineering focus on the ground infrastructure” to simplify Sentinel and bring its costs under control.
The Kremlin explained the need to update Russia’s nuclear doctrine comoreanda-news.com
Finland’s Fortum uses US nuclear fuel to cut Russia dependence reuters.com
MIT Launches Nuclear Security Center with Major Gift miragenews.com
South Korea, New Zealand condemn nuclear-armed North English.alarabiya.net
Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 98 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 98 nanosieverts per hour
Avocado from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Brazilian fuel cycle company Indústrias Nucleares do Brasil (INB) has announced that it will resume exploration for uranium in the country after a forty-year hiatus.
INB has launched the Uranium Prospecting and Mining Partnership Program. It is seeking to work in partnership with companies in the mining sector. INB said new research will be conducted in areas known for their “great mineral potential for this valuable substance”.
Adauto Seixas is the INB President. He said, “This new round of research comes at an important time for the country, since national production is still lower than the domestic consumption of the Angra I and II nuclear plants, and taking into account the increase in demand with the completion of Angra III.”
INB mentioned that the price of uranium has more than tripled in recent years. This “brings an avenue of opportunities for growth in the sector in the form of exporting concentrated uranium, and also with the possibility of offering nuclear fuel to the international market, adding value to the local production chain”.
INB added that “According to a study conducted forty years ago, Brazil had the eighth largest reserve in the world. However, considering that the second largest reserve is in Kazakhstan, which is the same size as the state of Rio de Janeiro, it is possible that the country could eventually take second place.”
According to World Nuclear Association (WNA), exploration in the 1970s and 1980s indicated that Brazil has reasonably assured resources of two hundred and ten thousand tons of uranium. There has been little investment in exploration since the mid-1980s.
The country has three main deposits. Pocos de Caldas in Minas Gerais state, where a uranium mine was closed in 1997; Lagoa Real or Caetité in Bahia state which has been operating since 1999; and Itataia, which is now called Santa Quitéria, in Ceará state, where the production of uranium as a co-product with phosphate is planned.
Uranium has been mined in Brazil since 1982, but the only currently operating mine is INB’s Lagoa Real/Caetité mine, with a capacity of three hundred and forty tons of uranium per year. The mine has known resources of ten thousand tons of uranium at 0.3%U.
INB began developing the adjacent Engenho mine in January 2017. It is a two hundred to three hundred tons of uranium per year open pit operation. Production was initially planned to begin in October of 2017, but has not yet begun.
In January of 2020, the country’s energy minister stated that investment in INB would allow it to produce one hundred and fifty tons of uranium annually from Caetité, starting in 2020. Production would expand to three hundred and sixty tons of uranium per year by 2023. The Santa Quitéria Consortium is a partnership between INB and privately owned fertilizer producer Galvani. It expects to produce two thousand three hundred tons of uranium concentrate annually from the Itataia deposit.
In 2022, Brazil produced forty-three tons of uranium. All mined uranium is used domestically, after it has been converted and enriched abroad. The country’s uranium consumption is currently about three hundred and thirty-nine tons of uranium per year.
In December of 2022, INB signed a contract with Russia’s Rosatom for the supply of three hundred and thirty tons of uranium in the form of natural UF6 to fuel the Angra nuclear power plant from 2023 to 2027. In May of 2023, three contracts were signed with Westinghouse to cover the supply of advanced fuel assemblies to be used for Angra 1 reloads.
Putin Allies Worry Nuclear Threat Isn’t Working newsweek.com
Fuel loading begins ahead of Onagawa 2 restart world-nuclear-news.org
Subsidies announced for Sizewell C development world-nuclear-news.org
Russia’s draft energy plan sets out new nuclear expansion world-nuclear-news.org
