America must not idly stand by as Russia builds nuclear capabilities. Thehill.com
The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Ambient office = 58 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 83 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 85 nanosieverts per hour
Carrot from Central Market = 111 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 130 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 122 nanosieverts per hour
CEF concerned that Ohio’s political leaders want tax payers to finance nuclear plants. Vindy.com
Wind & Solar In China Generating 2× Nuclear Today, Will Be 4× By 2030 cleantechnica.com
A giant offshore wind project has reignited debate over whether the intermittent renewable energy technology could one day replace nuclear power. Greentechmedia.com
Ambient office = 82 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 79 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 79 nanosieverts per hour
Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 99 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 115 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 108 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient office = 158 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 101 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 99 nanosieverts per hour
Broccoli tomato from Central Market = 89 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 95 nanosieverts per hour
Dover sole – Caught in USA = 119 nanosieverts per hour
I have blogged before about the importance of the molybdenum-99 radioisotope. This radioisotope is used to produce technetium-99m for about four fifths of nuclear imaging procedures for disease diagnosis. Mo-99 is produced primarily in research reactors and, since it has a half life of sixty-six hours, it cannot be stockpiled. Most of the world’s current supply of Mo-99 comes from just four reactors in Belgium, the Netherlands, Russia and South Africa.
The security of the Mo-99 supply is precarious because unexpected shutdowns of any one of the four producing reactors can result in major shortages of this critical radioisotope. In addition, most Mo-99 is produced by irradiating targets made of highly enriched uranium (HEU) which, by definition, means that the targets have twenty percent or more of U-235 which is highly radioactive. With enrichment at this level, there is a danger of nuclear proliferation.
Mo-99 is used in more than forty thousand procedures in the U.S. every day. However, the U.S. does not currently produce any Mo-99 and must import it. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) at the U.S. Department of Energy (DoE) has been working with commercial partners since 2009 to create a domestic Mo-99 supply network. They hope to make use of a variety of supply options that do not depend on HEU. Last year, the NNSA announced a new funding opportunity for the production of Mo-99 without HEU.
Yesterday, the DoE reported that the NNSA has completed its analysis of the applications submitted for the new funding. An independent review panel provided recommendations to the NNSA. Four companies have been selected to move to the next stage of the selection process to potentially receive cooperative agreement awards. The four companies are Niowave Inc, NorthStar Medical Radioisotopes LLC, Northwest Medical Isotopes (NWMI) and Shine Medical Isotopes. Funds have been allocated by Congress to provide up to fifteen million dollars for each of these companies with industry partners matching any government award.
Niowave is located in Lansing, Michigan. They are working on the use of superconducting electron linear accelerators for the production of medical radioisotoes such as Mo-99.
NorthStar is located in Beloit, Wisconsin. They are working on two different processes for the production of Mo-99 without HEU. The first process being developed relies on the Missouri University Research Reactor to irradiate Mo-98 targets to produce Mo-99. The second process will utilize a linear accelerator to produce Mo-99.
NWMI is located in Corvallis, Oregon. They have obtained technology from Oregon State University for new low-enriched uranium (LEU) to use in Triga research reactors. They have notified the Nuclear Regulatory Commission of their intent to submit an application for the construction of a facility that would produce the LEU targets. The targets would then be shipped to a network of university research reactors where they would be irradiated. The irradiated targets would then be shipped back to the NWMI facility to be processed to recover the Mo-99.
Shine is located Janesville, Wisconsin where they are building a facility. They will produce medical radioisotopes including Mo-99 at the facility. Their process uses a low-energy, accelerator-based neutron source to produce fission on a LEU target dissolved in an aqueous solution.
Rick Perry is the U.S. Secretary of Energy. He said, “Mo-99 is such a critical toll in healthcare. Doctors count on it every day. This industry outreach helps to develop a reliable domestic supply of a vital medical isotope, reduce dependence on foreign imports, and bring new opportunity to the heartland.”
Ambient office = 81 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Red bell pepper from Central Market = 72 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 81 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 70 nanosieverts per hour
There is a great deal of interest today in what are called small modular reactors (SMR) in the nuclear industry. A small modular reactor is defined as a nuclear fission reactor that produces three hundred million watts of electricity or less. It is hoped that manufacture of these SMRs in factories will improve safety and lower costs.
Holtec International is a global supplier of equipment and systems to the energy industry. They are based out of Camden, New Jersey. Holtec specializes in the design and manufacture of components for nuclear reactors. They also manufacture and sell dry cask storage systems for spent nuclear fuel assemblies.
The Holtec Inherently Safe Modular Underground Reactor SMR-160 is a design for a pressurized water reactor that will generate one hundred and sixty megawatts of electricity. In 2018, Holtec and GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy signed a contract to collaborate on the commercialization of the SMR-160.
Holtec describes the SMR-160 as a “passive, intrinsically safe, secure and economical small modular reactor that has the flexibility to be used in remote locations, in areas with limited water supplies or land, and in unique industrial applications where traditional larger reactors are not practical.”
Holtec also says that “The plant offers a balanced combination of practical innovation and proven technology to withstand the most severe postulated accidents. This advanced nuclear power plant has major appeal in domestic and international markets, offering a right-sized, cost-effective solution for carbon-free energy, and ensuring attainable power options to existing and emerging global economies demanding increased certainty of public safety, environmental protection and security from intrusion and proliferation of nuclear materials.”
The SMR-160 is currently under review by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission and is in Phase One of the three phase CNSC evaluation cycle. The State Nuclear Regulatory Inspectorate of Ukraine has a collaborative agreement with the CNSC. It is expected to coordinate its regulatory review of the SMR 160 with the CNSC.
The President of Ukraine’s Energoatom has announced that he will create a consortium with Holtec and the Ukrainian State Scientific and Technical Centre for Nuclear and Radiation Safety (SSTC-NRS) to investigate the technical and environmental feasibility of qualifying a “generic” SMR-160 system that can be constructed and operated anywhere in Ukraine. Holtec gives “…absolute assurance of public health and safety” for the SMR-160. The terms of engagement for the consortium will be announced soon.
Holtec has also announced signing a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with Exelon Generation to add them to the SMR-160 team which currently includes SNC-Lavin and Mitsubishi Electric. Chris Mudrick is the senior vice president for Northeast Operations for Exelon Generation. He said, “As the largest nuclear operator in the United States, Exelon Generation is pleased to partner with Holtec to develop an operating model for the SMR-160. This project is a great example of how innovation and new technologies are bringing our industry together and driving the future of nuclear power.”
The MoU says that Exelon will support the market acceptance of the SMR-160, create a generic deployment schedule and staffing plan, and assist improvements of the SMR-160 operational and maintainability features. As SMR-160s as built and deployed around the world, Exelon could supply reactor operating services to customers who do not have an established nuclear industry infrastructure.