Georgia regulators want more money to pay outside consultants to help keep track of the Plant Vogtle nuclear project. Thebrunswicknews.com
The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Ambient office = 89 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 105 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 94 nanosieverts per hour
Brussell sprout from Central Market = 102 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 91 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient office =116 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside =89 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 88 nanosieverts per hour
Zuccini from Central Market = 97 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 20 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 115 nanosieverts per hour
Dover sole – Caught in USA = 75 anosieverts per hour
The Russian Mining and Chemical Combine (MCC) was established in 1950 in Russia to produce plutonium for the Soviet Union nuclear arsenal. It is located in the city of Zheleznogorsk, Krasnoyarsk Krai. The company is currently part of the Rosatom group, the national nuclear company of Russia.
Some cities in the old Soviet Union where development and production of weapons and other important and sensitive technologies were carried out were referred to as “closed” cities where travel was severely restricted, and security was very tight. Zheleznogorsk was one of these closed cities. These closed cities did not even appear on any official Soviet maps. In 1992, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, President Boris Yeltsin decreed that these closed would now be added to official Russian maps and that their historic names could now be used. During the Soviet Era, Zheleznogorsk was referred to by such slang names as Soctown, Iron City, the Nine, and Atom Town.
The MCC said this week that it had just completed the next stage in the development of a nuclear battery. The new battery is what is called a beta battery which means that it is energized by the emission of highly energetic electrons from the decay of nickel-63 (NI-63). They claim that this battery would produce electricity for over fifty years.
The MCC said “Conversion of the working gas enriched for a Ni-63 to a form suitable for drawing on the semiconductor converter has been established. At the moment the delivery of the appropriate components for the deposition of Ni-63 and the final assembly of a prototype atomic battery is expected. The new converter design qualitatively increases the efficiency of all components.”
The MCC is acting as a system integrator for the new nuclear battery project. One important aspect of the project is procuring highly enriched NI-63 isotope. Another is the creation of a special structure for a semiconductor converter which changes the output of the isotope battery to a form suitable for use in electronic equipment.
The MCC had to create a number of different technologies in order to create the battery. They had to produce the necessary reagents to generate a working gas from NI-63 which could be fed to centrifuges. They had to restart the Electrochemical Plant to put a cascade of centrifuges into operation. Then they had to convert the NI-63 rich gas for deposition onto semiconductor material. The new technologies that had to be developed to the production chain for the isotope are protected by ten patents.
The technologies permit miniaturization of power sources for miniature devices used in cybernetics and artificial intelligence. It is hoped that it may aid the development of artificial neurons that could be used to imitate processes in the human brain. The new power sources should not be seen as replacement for lithium batteries. The MCC believes that the new type of devices that they are working on will become the foundation for a whole new architecture of electronic devices.
Ambient office = 92 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 75 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 75 nanosieverts per hour
Red onion from Central Market = 95 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 78 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 71 nanosieverts per hour
When we talk about commercial nuclear power reactors, it is usually in the context of generating electricity to feed the national grid. Nuclear plants generate heat which is converted to steam to generate the electricity. There are direct uses for that heat that do not require conversion to electricity. The heat could be used to desalinate seawater, produce hydrogen for heavy industry, decarbonize the transport sector and supply heat for use in residential and commercial applications.
Last week, the16th Dialogue Forum of the IAEA’s International Project for Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO), was held in Vienna, Austria. Sixty people from thirty-three countries discussed some benefits of nuclear cogeneration as well as technical challenges. Some of those attending presented current cogeneration projects and others presented plans for countries that are just starting their nuclear programs. One piece of advice at the meeting was that countries that were just ramping up a nuclear program should include plans for cogeneration from the very beginning.
Mikhail Chudakov is the IAEA Deputy Director General and Head of the Department of Nuclear Energy. He said, “Nuclear cogeneration is very important, particularly if nuclear power is to expand much more broadly in energy markets to meet the need for clean and sustainable energy, while helping to mitigate climate change through avoidance of carbon emissions.”
There have been cogeneration projects at some nuclear power plants since the 1960s. Because of economic and regulatory reasons, cogeneration never took off commercially. There have been significant changes in technology and regulations that have improved the conditions significantly.
Cogeneration offers other benefits for the nuclear industry. It could provide more flexibility for the production of electricity by being able to switch between electricity and heat as electricity demand rises and falls. Another important application is removing salt from seawater, so it can be used for residential and commercial needs.
Juergen Kupitz was a Co-Chair of the 16th Dialogue Forum. He is an industry expert from Germany. He said, “This could substantially increase the fresh water supply in many regions and thus contribute to development and increased standard of living. Water, energy and a healthy environment are basic life support systems.”
The market in heat is bigger than the market for electricity. However, while electricity can be sent to sites remote from the location of the generators, heat demand and use takes place in scattered local markets.
Commercialization of cogeneration at nuclear power plants is impeded by several challenges. The biggest challenge lies in the economics of the heat market. There are also problems in the absence of political commitment to cogeneration. There is low public acceptance for nuclear cogeneration as well.
It would be helpful to the cogeneration movement for there to be demonstration plants that possible customers could actually see in operation. However, it is difficult for nuclear power plants to make such a huge commitment on a demo cogeneration system unless they have a committed customer for the heat.
Some potential non-electric applications of nuclear energy may require obtaining specials licenses, new regulations and approval of national regulatory agencies. Nuclear power plants that intend to use cogeneration to sell heat might need to apply for special licenses.
Critical to the prospects for commercial cogeneration is the availability of technicians with specific expertise to operate such plants. The lack of such human resources is another barrier for the spread of cogeneration.
Xin Yan was a Co-Chair of the 16th Dialogue Forum from the Japan Atomic Energy Agency who summed up some cogeneration challenges. He said, “First, we need to learn from other conventional industries who have been successful in forming alliances. This is happening already on a smaller scale, as the Republic of Korea and Saudi Arabia have joined forces to develop an SMR for desalination and cogeneration in the Middle East. Second, the IAEA is the best international body to help guide Member States to develop non-electric applications and should play a larger role in increasing public awareness. And thirdly, nuclear newcomer countries should make use of available tools, such as those offered by the IAEA, to understand non-electric applications, to help them in their economic development and to understand the technical challenges.”
Ambient office = 104 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 93 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 96 nanosieverts per hour
Bannana from Central Market = 87 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 144 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 135 nanosieverts per hour