Pompeo gives Russia an ultimatum: 60 days to comply with nuclear weapons treaty or US will leave. Cnbc.com
The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Ambient office = 113 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 138 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 139 nanosieverts per hour
Yellow bell pepper from Central Market = 96 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 118 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 109 nanosieverts per hour
Nuclear power plants are designed to prevent the escape of radioactive materials. As nuclear power plants age, the danger of release of radioactive materials increases. All nuclear power plants contain a vast network of pipe to carry coolant through the different components of the system. As these pipes age, the danger of corrosion and cracks allowing radioactive materials to leak increases. Monitoring and maintaining the network of pipes in a nuclear power plant is a critical task.
Most of the commercial power reactors in the world today are pressurized water reactors (PWR). In a PWR, the primary coolant is water. Radioactive water and steam are pumped through a closed system of pipes that carries them to the core to be heated by the heat released from the nuclear fission reaction. From there they are carried to a heat exchanger that transfers the heat to water circulating in secondary network of pipes. The water in the secondary system is converted to steam that is fed into a turbine to create electricity.
A failure anywhere in the network of pipes could be a major problem. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is concerned that pipes in nuclear power plants may be undergoing corrosion that could result in leaks and ruptures. This could lead to disasters in which the function of the plant is impaired and/or radioactive materials are released into the environment.
It is difficult to monitor corrosion inside pipes. One source of corrosion is from gases that might be trapped inside the pipe network. Gases mixed with water naturally rises to the highest spot in the container. In a network of pipes, the highest points can become places where gases accumulate, and corrosion occurs. One of the ways to detect potential problems spots is to map the network of pipes.
If highest points can be correctly identified, then vents can be installed in those parts of the pipe network to allow gas to escape and prevent corrosion. The old system to mapping pipe networks utilized hand tools which required staff to spend a lot of time in and around the pipe network. This could result in exposure to dangerous levels of radiation. And, using hand tools is a crude system and could easily miss important information about the pipe network.
Exact Metrology (EM) is a company that specializes in 3D and CT scanning. A few EM technicians can scan the entire pipe network of a nuclear power plant using Leica HDS scanners. These scanners are able to capture full-volume, 360° 3D point clouds for a location in just three minutes. A point cloud is a very accurate digital record of an object or space. Some rooms only require one such scan, while other rooms require multiple scans. Once the scanner is set up and started, the rest of the process is automatic, and the technician can retreat to a safer area if necessary. Once all the scans have been carried out, the separate scans are combined into a single point cloud.
Once the complete point cloud is created, sophisticated computer algorithms are used to identify the pipe sizes, centerlines and positions, even if some section of pipe are concealed from view. The point cloud for nuclear reactor pipe networks is able to identify sections of pipe which are crystalized and leaking.
Once the scanning and point cloud assembly are completed, 3D CAD models are created. Computer snapshot are recorded with elevations descriptors marked on the pipe runs. These snapshots are sent to engineers at the facility to determine if it is necessary to install vents at particular high points.
One big benefit of 3D scanning is that the scans can be carried out at ground level. This means that technicians do not need to climb ladders and scaffolding which reduces the danger to the technicians. Another benefit of 3D scans is that additional measurements can be conducted without the need to return to the actual pipe network. The point cloud assembled in the computer can be accessed to provide the additional measurements.
The development of 3D scanning systems has been of great benefit to the nuclear power industry.
Ambient office = 69 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside = 88 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 86 nanosieverts per hour
Bartlett pear from Central Market = 134 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 73 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 67 nanosieverts per hour
I have blogged about the San Onofre Generating Station near San Diego before. This plant is owned and was operated by the Southern California Edison (SCE) utility. The plant was shut down in 2013 after replacement steam generators failed. SCE redesigned the replacement generators but were told by the manufacturer that the new designs might not work correctly. SCE told the manufacture to go ahead and build the redesigned generators. SCE also told the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that they had made no changes to the generators and did not need to get approval from the NRC.
As with all shuttered nuclear power plants, there was a question of what to do with all the spent fuel. Some California activists wanted it removed from the site. The operators decided that they would lease land at the Navy’s nearby San Onofre Camp Pendleton for their underground storage facility. They put spent fuel rods into Holtec dry cask containers made of concrete and steel and moved them under ground. Activist fought this decision but lost.
Now the NRC has just issued a report that states that every Holtec dry cask that has been lowered into the ground is damaged. Apparently, there is not enough clearance between the dry casks and the divider shell in the storage hole. The sides of the dry casks already show signs of wear. As a result of such wear, cracks form in the walls of the dry casks. Over time, these cracks will grow and multiply. This could result in the leakage of radioactive materials in casks as well as explosions.
The NRC says that SCE and Holtec have known about this problem since January of 2018 but continued to lower twenty nine dry casks into the storage hole. The NRC has ordered SCE and Holtec to stop loading dry casks into the storage hole until this problem is dealt with. SCE and Holtec say that there is no way to inspect and repair dry casks once they are in the storage hole.
Activists say that the NRC should admit that the Holtec dry casks are based on a faulty design and that the NRC should revoke the licenses of SCE and Holtec to carry out their current dry cask storage plan. They say that the NRC should mandate that all the thin-walled Holtec dry casks should be removed from the storage hole and the spent nuclear fuel in them should be transferred to new thick-walled transportable dry casks. These transportable casks are the only temporary storage system for spent nuclear fuel that can be inspected, maintained, repaired and monitored sufficiently to reduce the risk of explosions and the release of radioactive materials. There are calls for responsible California state agencies to cancel the permits for San Onofre dry cask storage and to withhold Decommissioning Trust Funds until these problems have been solved.
Critics of the work done so far by SCE and Holtec say that the leases for Navy land should be cancelled and that the Navy should bring in their own nuclear experts to deal with what the critics consider to be a national security issue. They say that the thin-walled dry casks being used by SCE and Holtec are a clear and imminent danger to the health and lives of the citizens, and pose potential financial, security and ecological disaster for the state of California, and beyond.
San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station:
Ambient office = 69 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside =88 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 86 nanosieverts per hour
Avocado from Central Market = 134 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 73 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 67 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient office = 104 nanosieverts per hour
Ambient outside =89 nanosieverts per hour
Soil exposed to rain water = 89 nanosieverts per hour
Beefstreak tomato from Central Market = 79 nanosieverts per hour
Tap water = 106 nanosieverts per hour
Filter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour