The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
There are many sites around the world contaminated by radioactive materials. Some sites such as the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Washington State were dedicated to nuclear weapons production and little regard was given to safely disposing of radioactive materials. Some sites such as the Nevada Test Site were used to test nuclear weapons before a treaty banned above ground and atmospheric tests. Some sites such as Fukushima were contaminated by accidents at nuclear power plants. There are millions of tons of soil around the world contaminated by radioactive materials that can threaten the environment and public health.
Last November, Japan’s Fukushima Prefecture and France’s Alternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) carried out a successful test of a new process for decontaminating radioactive soil.
The French Demeterres project was launched in 2013 for the purpose of developing bio- and eco-technology that could decontaminated soil and effluents for post-nuclear accident remediation. Twenty-three million dollars was allocated for the five-year project involving CEA, Orano, Veolia, the Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety (IRSN), the National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), and the French Agricultural Research Centre for International Development (CIRAD).
One of the physiochemical processes that was developed by the Demeterres project utilizes particulate floatation foams. Soil contaminated with cesium is mixed with water to create a suspension. This mixture is injected into the middle of a floatation column. Air is pumped into the bottom of the floatation column to create bubbles. The contaminated soil particles adhere to the surface of the bubbles of air which rise to the surface of the column. Uncontaminated soil particles sink to the bottom of the column. The first test of the system took place in 2016 when uncontaminated soil was run through the column to gather data on the process.
After the March 2011 nuclear disaster at Fukushima, about twenty-nine million cubic yards of soil were removed. They wanted evacuees to be able to move back into their homes as quickly as possible. The contaminated soil was placed in huge storage bags and stored at several dedicated sites. The Japanese government is looking for the best way to reduce or remove the radioactivity in the soil.
In April of 2017, Japan’s Ministry of the Environment put out a call for demonstrations of decontamination techniques. The froth floatation process was one of ten techniques that were selected for demonstration out of a total of nineteen submissions.
The froth floatation process was tested on about six hundred pounds of contaminated soil at Okuma in Fukushima Prefecture between November 13 and November 17 of 2017. The radioactivity of the soil samples was cut to between one third and one half of the original contamination level. As a result of the tests, pretreatment of soil through drying, crumbling, pre-sifting and/or dispersion in water were suggested to improve the process.
A spokesperson for CEA said, “If the technology presented is selected by the Japanese authorities, the next stage will be to develop the process on a larger scale so that it can be used in the Japanese municipalities that house storage centers.”
There is an eight hundred and ninety square mile Federal site in the desert in southeastern Idaho which includes that Idaho National Laboratory, the nation’s leading federal nuclear research lab. The site is located about fifty miles west of the city of Idaho Falls. It has been used by the U.S. government for storage and disposal of nuclear waste from nuclear weapons development and research since the 1950s. There have been a series of court battles between the State of Idaho and the Federal government over the cleanup of the site. Idaho officials were fearful that Idaho was becoming a national nuclear waste dump.
The Radioactive Waste Management complex occupies seventy-seven acres of the remote desert site. It includes an administration area, the Subsurface Disposal Area and the Transuranic Storage Area. Fluor Idaho is a contractor for the DoE who is employing more than seven hundred people to clean up the site
The Subsurface Disposal Area occupies ninety-seven acres of the site. It has been used for disposing of low-level hazardous and transuranic waste which includes such items as work clothing, rags, machine parts and tools that have been contaminated by uranium, plutonium, americium and other radioactive elements. Most of the transuranic waste in the Subsurface Disposal Area was generated during nuclear weapons production at the Rocky Flats Plant near Denver, Colorado.
The Transuranic Storage Area occupies about fifty-six acres. Containers of transuranic waste sit on asphalt pads and are covered by an earth berm. Workers are retrieving eighty-five thousand cubic yards of waste that is being prepared for shipment to the U.S. geological repository at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, New Mexico.
Yesterday, Federal officials activated an Emergency Operations center. Crews were sent to investigate an incident that was reported at the site. The U.S. Department of Energy announced that it is gathering information about the incident.
A fifty-five gallon barrel of radioactive sludge cracked open at the complex. A fire alarm was triggered which resulted in the arrival of three Idaho National Laboratory firefighters who extinguished the smoldering barrel and removed it from proximity to a dozen other barrels nearby. The current theory of what caused the barrel to rupture is that the waste in the barrel heated it and ignited particles of uranium.
Emergency workers detected a small amount of radioactivity on the skins of the firefighters after they dealt with the ruptured barrel. The firefighters were taken to a medical facility and the radioactive material on their skin was washed off. Fortunately, they did not inhale any radioactive material because they were protected by their suits. No radioactive material was detected outside the building. The officials said that there was no danger to the public.
Federal officials said that this was the first case of a barrel rupturing but there might be more. Bad record keeping at the complex means that they are not sure exactly what is in the barrels of fluids and solvents left over from nuclear weapons production.
The DoE said that it was their standard practice to activate the Emergency Operations Center to coordinate incident responders when there is a report of an incident. State, county and tribal officials were notified of the incident by the DoE.
