The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
The European Union is a political and economic union with twenty-eight member states, most of which are located in Europe. “The EU has developed an internal single market through a standardized system of laws that apply in all member states. EU policies aim to ensure the free movement of people, goods, services, and capital within the internal market, enact legislation in justice and home affairs, and maintain common policies on trade, agriculture, fisheries, and regional development.” Wikipedia
The EU has the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union that work on legislation for the Union. The European Commission is the executive branch responsible for the management of the EU (EC). It also has the Court of Justice of the European Union (ECJ) that adjudicated legal disputes between the member nations.
Some nations in the EU such as the U.K. and France are committed to nuclear power while other members such as Luxembourg and Austria are strongly opposed to the use of nuclear power in the EU. In 2015, Austria filed a law suit in the ECJ against the decision of the European Commission to allow new UK state subsidies for the Hinkley Point C project. The Commission said that the construction of new nuclear power reactors at the Hinkley Point power plant would be a “objective for common interest of the members of the EU.” Luxembourg supported Austria in the suit which should be decided sometime this summer.
Now Austria is mounting a legal challenge to the Commission’s support for an expansion of the Paks nuclear power plant in Hungary with construction contracted to the Russian company Rosatom. Once again, Luxembourg is supporting Austria in the ECJ. The two EU members want to gather more EU members into an alliance to counterbalance what they see as blank approval by the EC of state subsidies for nuclear power plant projects in the EU.
Some member nations in the EU see the Hungarian project as an example of the Hungarian Prime Minister moving closer to Russia in economic matters. The Commission gave final approval for the project a year ago after Budapest promised to “limit distortions in competition.”
Austria’s minister for sustainability, agriculture and tourism said, “I am very pleased that Luxembourg is joining the complainants with regards to the extension of the Paks nuclear plant and is joining us in court proceedings. This strengthens our position. Further action will be taken at European level. It is important that no one invests public money into nuclear energy, because it is certainly the wrong way if they want to achieve climate protection goals.”
With respect to an anti-nuclear alliance, the Austrian minister said, “We have great hopes for the new German coalition. In the coalition agreement, they also say that no state aid should be granted to build nuclear power plants. On Wednesday, I’ll meet Frau [Barbara] Hendricks [German minister for environment and nuclear safety] in Berlin and we will talk about this topic.”
The Luxembourg minister of the environment said that the two countries wanted to stop the “renaissance of nuclear energy”. She went on to say, “It is important that no one invests public money into nuclear energy, because it is certainly the wrong way if they want to achieve climate protection goals.”
The head of the European Commission said last year that the EC would publish a “communication” on the future of the Euroatom treaty by the summer of 2018. Hopefully, the EU will be able to work out a nuclear policy that is more acceptable to all EU members.
Members of the European Union:
Part 2 (Please read Part 1 first)
The U.S. had a nuclear missile engine under development in the 1960s called Project Pluto. They did some development work and testing but ultimate abandoned the project. The engine was so “dirty” that it would have left a trail of nuclear fallout as it flew. This was a serious problem if you wanted to launch it from inside the U.S. or you wanted to fly it over any friendly country. The same problems might plague any Russian nuclear engine.
Putin also talked about a new cruise missile powered by a miniature nuclear engine with a basically unlimited range that could be launched from a Russian nuclear bomber. As he said with respect to some other nuclear missiles in his speech, this one is supposed to have an unlimited range and the ability to evade any existing antimissile defense system. The same issues with respect to nuclear engines detailed above would also apply to this cruise missile. One question that could be important is the question of how much each of the nuclear engines would cost. Obviously, the cost would be much greater than the cost of conventional engines. This could limit the number of these missiles that could be practically deployed even if the nuclear engine to power them really exists.
The RS-28 Sarmat is a liquid-fueled super heavy intercontinental ballistic missile that carries ten to twenty-four nuclear warheads. This missile is under development at the Makeyev Rocket Design Bureau. Estimated weight of the Sarmat is over a hundred tons. It has a payload of ten tons which would allow it to carry ten heavy warheads, fifteen lighter warheads or as many as twenty-four hypersonic glide vehicles. The range of the Sarmat is about six thousand miles. This is an upgraded version of the Satan ICBM that the Russians already have in their arsenal. A non-nuclear-powered version will be deployable around 2020.
Putin said in his speech that the Kinzhal is a new hypersonic cruise missile launched from an aircraft. (An aircraft is considered hypersonic if it travels at about ten times the speed of sound or around six thousand miles per hour.) It is a low to medium altitude all weather short-range missile system. It is designed for attacking airplanes, helicopters, cruise missiles, precision guided munitions, unmanned air vehicles and short range ballistic threats. Putin claims that it has the ability to fly at an extremely low altitude and avoid missile defense systems by maneuvering around their detection zones. It is said to have a range of about one thousand miles. Putin claims that this missile is already deployed in the Southern Military District in Southern Russia.
The Status-6 is an unmanned underwater drone that could could cruise undetected into a port and explode in a multi-megaton blast that would destroying everything for miles. It is supposed to be much faster than any existing underwater craft. Stories of such a weapon have been floating around for years. The problem is that there is no certainty that it even exists. As they say, if something sounds too good (or bad) to be true, it probably does not.
Non-Russian nuclear weapons experts questioned the presentation of these nuclear weapons as new developments. Some say that Putin was just repackaging and rebranding some existing weapons for publicity. There are also questions about the accuracy of the presented specifications.
RS-28 Sarmat missile: