The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Reactors 1498 – Molex Working on a Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycling Facility

    Nuclear Reactors 1498 – Molex Working on a Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycling Facility

    Moltex Energy Canada Inc has started pre-licensing consultation with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission in relation to the development of its Waste to Stable Salt (WATSS) process for converting spent uranium oxide fuel into molten salt reactor fuel.

    The innovative process extracts valuable materials and radioactive byproducts from spent nuclear fuel in oxide form, including Candu, light water reactor and certain fast reactor fuels, such as mixed oxide (MOX) fuels. It accomplishes this in a single, streamlined twenty-four-hour chemical process, with a versatile pretreatment step that the company says can accommodate exotic, experimental, or advanced reactor fuels.

    The extracted transuranic elements are concentrated to create molten salt fuel, while fission products are removed. This reduces the volume of the waste dramatically but also transforms spent nuclear fuel into clean, dispatchable energy, permanently eliminating long-lived transuranic elements like plutonium, Moltex says. Coupled with the company’s Stable Salt Reactor-Wasteburner (SSR-W) reactor technology, the process enables the creation of a closed fuel cycle.

    Moltex states that it has now signed a Service Level Agreement with the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC), which “lays out a framework for engagement and discussions with the regulator to receive feedback on key topical areas such as safety, security and safeguards, to ensure that regulatory requirements are suitably taken into account at every stage of the development”.

    Moltex added, “This framework will in turn allow the CNSC to facilitate engagement with the International Atomic Energy Agency to ensure that the WATSS facility and associated fuel cycle will be compatible with the application of international obligations under the treaty on the non-proliferations of nuclear weapons, and ensure best practices are incorporated into the design as early as possible.”

    Last month, Moltex announced that its WATSS process had been successfully tested on spent nuclear fuel bundles from a “commercial reactor in Canada” through hot cell experiments carried out by Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL) which has the only facilities in Canada equipped to handle spent nuclear fuel. The experiments demonstrated that the process can extract ninety percent of the transuranic material from spent nuclear fuel in twenty four hours, with greater efficiency over longer periods of time, the company said.

    The company intends to deploy the first WATSS unit at NB Power’s Point Lepreau site in New Brunswick. Molex also plans to deploy the first SSR-W by the early to mid-2030s. The commercial-scale demonstration facility will recycle an anticipated two hundred and sixty spent nuclear fuel bundles from existing Candu pressurized heavy water reactors and create recycled fuel for the entire sixty-year operating life of one three-hundred-megawatt demonstration SSR-W. Moltex said it is now progressing with the engineering design and safety analysis of the commercial facility.

    Olivier Gregoire is the Licensing Manager at Moltex. He said, “We appreciate the opportunity to get early feedback on the design from the CNSC to ensure we are designing a facility that meets the highest standards. “Early engagement minimizes the risk of late-stage additions to the design which can create needless cost increases. This engagement will streamline site specific licensing.”

    Moltex Energy Limited is the U.K.-based parent company of MoltexFlex Limited and Moltex Energy Canada Inc. Earlier this month, it was announced that the company had entered administration. When a company enters administration, it means that the company is insolvent and unable to pay its debts. Offers are currently being requested to acquire the business and assets of Moltex Energy Limited and/or shares in the company’s subsidiaries. The deadline for such offers is the 7th of May.

    Molex Energy

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 14, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 109 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 63 nanosieverts per hour

    Celery from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 111 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 13, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Beefsteak tomato from Central Market = 104

    Tap water = 121 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 112 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 12, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 84 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 126 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 95 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1497 – GE Hitachi Is Working On A Steel-Concrete Composite for Reactor Walls

    Nuclear Reactors 1497 – GE Hitachi Is Working On A Steel-Concrete Composite for Reactor Walls

    A research team led by GE Hitachi Nuclear has successfully tested an innovative new building block made of steel-concrete composite that is purported to significantly reduce the cost of building nuclear reactor containment structures.

    In 2021, the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) awarded a cost-shared, multi-year project to GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) and other stakeholders for the first project of the Advanced Construction Technology Initiative (ACTI). The purpose of this cost-shared public-private partnership is to help demonstrate several technologies that, when combined, could reduce the construction costs of building new reactors by more than ten percent and significantly lower the scheduling risks and uncertainties associated with constructing them.

    As part of the initiative, GEH is working on the development of its Diaphragm Plate Steel Composite (DPSC), a modular steel-concrete composite. The DPSC design has several advantages over conventional steel concrete composite techniques, such as reinforcing concrete with two continuous steel plates connected using adjoining plates with circular concrete flow holes.

    The design of the composite features reinforced concrete with two continuous steel plates, allowing for enhanced durability and flexibility. These modules can be manufactured off-site, shipped, and assembled quickly, significantly reducing labor costs and construction timelines. The modules are connected to form structural walls, floors, or mat foundation sections. DPSC test samples were recently tested at Purdue University’s Bowen Laboratory in Lafayette, Indiana.

    The modules can also be manufactured to have different plate material on either side of a wall to improve meeting certain corrosion requirements in nuclear power plants.

    Researchers filled the modular plates with concrete to simulate a reactor containment wall. They subjected the structure to various loading conditions to mimic real-life situations that a reactor building might experience, such as an earthquake.

    Luke Voss is the program manager at the Idaho National Laboratory. He said, “The DPSC system tests at Purdue exceeded our expectations. We are very excited and enthusiastic about the use of this construction technology to help save time and money in the deployment of new nuclear reactors.”

    Sean Sexstone is the Executive Vice President, Advanced Nuclear, GE Hitachi. He commented, “The successful design, fabrication and testing of DPSC modules demonstrates the potential of this advanced fabrication and construction technology to lead to cost savings and improved project schedules in the deployment of small modular reactors.”

    The data collected during the demonstration will be utilized to support licensing of the modules for use in future reactor containment construction.

    The National Reactor Innovation Center is currently reviewing a proposal from GEH to construct a portion of a reactor containment building using the DPSC design for the walling system to further test the technology. The demonstration would also create a digital twin of the civil structure and utilize non-destructive evaluation techniques that were developed in Phase 1 of the project.

    GEH intends to implement this technology in its first four BWXR-300 small modular reactors in Darlington, Ontario, Canada. A construction license was granted to Ontario Power Generation earlier this month for this purpose.

    National Reactor Innovation Center

  • Geiger Readings for Apr 11, 2025

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Ambient office = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 1230 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 126 nanosieverts per hour

    White onion from Central Market = 13 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 120 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 108 nanosieverts per hour