
Blog
-
Geiger Readings for Jan 31, 2017
Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 89 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 84 nanosieverts per hourBeefsteak tomatofrom Central Market = 83 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 117 nanosieverts per hourFilter water = 101 nanosieverts per hour -
Nuclear Reactors 544 – Researchers At A Russian University Are Investigating The Use Of Molybdenum Alloys For Fuel Rod Cladding
I have blogged in the past about research projects that are using molybdenum to produce a better nuclear fuel for reactors. Now researchers at the National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Russia) Russia are working on improving the covering of nuclear fuel rods with a special form of molybdenum.
Currently, zirconium alloys are used to create the material called cladding that is used to cover the uranium fuel pellets in most nuclear fuel rods. Zirconium alloys are resistant to corrosion and erosion in water. They also have a low thermal neutron capture cross-section. This is a measure of the probability of a chemical interaction between neutrons and the atomic nuclei of the alloy. The smaller the cross-section, the lower the probability.
Zirconium alloys have several problems with their use for nuclear fuel rod cladding. They can generate heat in water and produce hydrogen gas which is highly explosive. This will happen if the temperature in the core of the reactor gets above thirteen hundred degrees Fahrenheit. This means that if there is a major problem with the cooling system at a nuclear power plant that is cooled by water, the zirconium cladding could caused explosions and fires. Hydrogen gas generated from zirconium cladding on the fuel rods at Fukushima totally demolished one of the reactor buildings and seriously damaged another.
Molybdenum alloys have been considered as a replacement for zirconium alloys in the cladding of nuclear fuel rods. Molybdenum alloys have high corrosion and erosion resistance like zirconium alloys, but they have a greater thermal conductivity which reduces their tendency to build up heat. The main problem with the use of molybdenum alloys for nuclear fuel cladding is the expense of their use. The uranium being used in the fuel rods would have to be more highly enriched than the fuel currently in use which would also add to the expense of their use.
The Russian researchers believe that they can overcome some of the problems of molybdenum alloy use by changing the proportions of the different isotopes in the molybdenum from the composition of naturally occurring molybdenum. The same centrifuges that are used to enrich uranium can also be used for this purpose. This allows the creations of alloys with a thermal cross-section that is as small or smaller than the thermal cross-section of zirconium alloys. The use of these alloys for nuclear fuel rod cladding would definitely increase nuclear power plant safety.
A professor at MEPHI’s Department of molecular physics said that the study carried out by the researchers has provided “all the information necessary for the design of a separation system for the large-scale production of isotopically modified molybdenum on the basis of existing Russian technology for the separation of non-uranium isotopes in gas centrifuges.”
The study at MPEhI was funded by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. It was carried out in cooperation with the department of engineering physics at the Tsiunghua University in Beijing, China.
-
Geiger Readings for Jan 30, 2017
Ambient office = 80 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 77 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 79 nanosieverts per hourCarrot from Central Market = 86 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 89 nanosieverts per hourFilter water = 77 nanosieverts per hour -
Radioactive Waste 329 – Scientists Using Yeast To Clean Up Radioactive Environmental Contamination
Uranium is a very common element on Earth. It combines with many other elements to form a wide variety of minerals. There are deposits of uranium ore in many locations that can be mined. Uranium is a main contributor to background radiation that is found in varying amounts all over the Earth.
There is a tiny amount of radium mixed in with naturally occurring uranium. All isotopes of radium are highly radioactive. The most stable isotope of radium is radium-226 which has a half-life of sixteen hundred years. R-226 decays into radon which is a gas.
The Environmental Working Group (EWG) website says that the EWG is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to protecting human health and the environment. They have just released the results of an important study on radioactive elements in U.S. drinking water. The study was conducted between 2010 and 2015.
The EWG investigation found that over half of the drinking water available in the U.S. contains radioactive elements. During the investigation, the EWG tested almost fifty thousand public water systems. They estimated that the water consumed by over one hundred and seventy million citizens of the U.S. contain radioactive elements. The EPA sets safe limits for such elements in drinking water and twenty-seven states have water supplies in which the radioactive elements exceed what is considered safe by the EPA.
The most common element that was found in drinking water by the EWG was radium. Radium is dissolved out of soil and rock by the passage of water. Radon gas is also released into underground water as the radium decays. In areas where the Earth is shocked and strained by the process of fracking, the amount of radium in the water is greater. Radium releases ionizing radiation which is potentially carcinogenic which means it can cause cancers.
The EWG found that in one hundred and fifty-eight public water supply systems used by two hundred and seventy-six thousand U.S. citizens, the level or radium is greater than that allowed by the EPA. The EPA requirements say that there should not be more than seventy cases of cancer caused by drinking water out of one million consumers. Texas was found to be the state with radium in the most water supplies. It is estimated that about eighty percent of Texans have some radium in their water supply.
The EPA guidelines for safe drinking water have been criticized as being too lenient. In 2006, California released much more stringent requirements for safe levels of radium than the EPA. The California standards say that there should not be more than one case of cancer caused by drinking water in a million consumers. By these standards, over one hundred and twenty-two million people nationwide are drinking water with too much radium in it.
A senior science advisor with EWG issued a statement that said, ““Most radioactive elements in tap water come from natural sources, but that doesn’t take away the need to protect people through stronger standards and better water treatment.” “Millions of Americans are drinking water with potentially harmful levels of radioactive elements, but the outdated federal standards mean many people don’t know about the risk they face when they turn on the tap.”
The EWG has created this interactive map of U.S. water supplies that contain radium.
-
Geiger Readings for Jan 29, 2017
Ambient office = 61 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 75 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 76 nanosieverts per hourOrange bell pepper from Central Market = 126 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 126 nanosieverts per hourFilter water = 116 nanosieverts per hour -
Geiger Readings for Jan 28, 2017
Ambient office = 96 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 117 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 106 nanosieverts per hourAvocado from Central Market = 115 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 125 nanosieverts per hourFilter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour