The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Fusion 74 – Researchers At Fluminense Federal University Investigate One-neutron Stripping

    Nuclear Fusion 74 – Researchers At Fluminense Federal University Investigate One-neutron Stripping

         Nuclear fusion is the process that powers the Sun and stars, and results in high-energy output. However, achieving nuclear fusion in lab settings is very challenging because it requires extreme temperature and pressure conditions.
         A new study details a more practical alternative to nuclear fusion. It shows that one-neutron stripping (ONS) can produce similar or more output than a fusion reaction. This is particularly true in low-energy regions close to the minimum energy threshold required for a nuclear reaction.    ONS is a nuclear reaction during which a neutron from a moving nucleus is kicked out as it hits another nucleus. ONS is a type of one-neutron transfer reaction. The expelled neutron (from the moving nucleus) is absorbed by the target nucleus.
         Compared to nuclear fusion, ONS is much simpler to achieve in the lab. These findings open a new and feasible avenue for achieving our nuclear energy goals.
         Jesús Lubián is one of the study authors and an associate professor at Brazil’s Fluminense Federal University. He said, “By better understanding the behavior of nuclei in these conditions, we can enhance our approaches to nuclear energy production and radiation therapy.”
         Scientists have been trying to comprehend the mechanism that leads to the transfer of neutrons in weakly bound nuclei for decades, It is important for us to decode this mechanism because it can greatly improve our understanding of nuclear physics, including various nuclear reactions.
         The authors of the report performed an interesting experiment for this purpose. They examined the ONS process between Li-6 (a Lithium isotope) and Bi-209 (an isotope of Bismuth). Then they compared its output with that of the complete fusion reaction involving the same isotopes.
         They utilized the GALILEO Array (a grammar-ray detector) in combination with the 4π Si-ball EUCLIDES (an advanced laser detector) to study gamma-ray emissions and detect charged particles during the reactions.
         The researchers note that they also used a special method known as the gamma-gamma coincidence, to study different gamma rays identified in the ONS. They said, “The gamma-gamma coincidence was crucial in isolating specific reaction channels, allowing the team to pinpoint the behavior of nuclei under different conditions with high accuracy.”
         The results of ONS between Bi-209 and Li-6 surprised the researchers. Here’s what the researchers found:

    In the tested reaction, the weekly bound Li-6 collides with much heavier Bi-209. The result of this interaction indicates that one-neutron transfer is capable of producing output similar to that of a fusion reaction.
         The study authors said that “One-neutron stripping process yields results comparable to those of complete fusion reactions especially in energy regions near nuclear barriers. Contrary to previous expectations, the results indicate that the one-neutron transfer plays a dominant role at lower energies, exceeding the output of fusion reactions.”
         These findings may unlock new opportunities for employing one-neutron transfer in areas such as nuclear energy research.
         The study authors added that “The process underscores the intricate and nuanced nature of nuclear reactions, providing a steppingstone for future scientific breakthroughs in nuclear science and technology.”

  • Geiger Readings for Aug 01, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Aug 01, 2024

    Ambient office = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 99 nanosieverts per hour

    Purple onion from Central Market = 95 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

  • July 2024 – No posts for June.

    Shut down system to deal with technical problems.

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 30, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Jun 30, 2024

    Ambient office = 106 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 132 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    Mini bella mushroom from Central Market = 83 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 65 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 56 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 29, 2024

    Geiger Readings for Jun 29, 2024

    Ambient office = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 119 nanosieverts per hour

    Green onion from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 63 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 98 nanosieverts per hour

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory Researches The Use Of Gallium Nitride For Nuclear Reactor Sensors

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory Researches The Use Of Gallium Nitride For Nuclear Reactor Sensors

         The safety and efficiency of a large, complex nuclear reactor can be improved by hardware as simple as a tiny sensor that monitors a cooling system. Researchers at the Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) are working to make those basic sensors more accurate by combining them with electronics that can withstand the intense radiation inside a reactor.
         The ORNL research team recently met with high success using a gallium nitride semiconductor for sensor electronics. A transistor made with this material continued with operations near the core of a nuclear reactor operated by research partner The Ohio State University.
         Gallium nitride is a wide-bandgap semiconductor. It had previously been tested against the ionizing radiation encountered when rockets travel through space. Devices that employ wide-bandgap semiconductors can operate at much higher frequencies, temperatures and irradiation rates. However, gallium nitride had not faced the even more intense radiation of neutron bombardment.
         Kyle Reed is a member of the Sensors and Electronics group at ORNL. He is the lead researcher for the transistor research. He said, “We are showing it is great for this neutron environment.”
         This discovery could offer a big boost for equipment monitoring in nuclear facilities. The information collected by sensors provides early warnings about wear and tear on equipment. This allows timely maintenance to avoid broader equipment failures that cause reactor downtime. Currently, this sensing data is processed from a distance. It must travel through yards of cable connected to electronics with silicon-based transistors.
         Reed said, “Our work makes measuring the conditions inside an operating nuclear reactor more robust and accurate. When you have lengthy cables, you end up with a lot of noise, which can interfere with the accuracy of the sensor information. By placing electronics closer to a sensor, you increase its accuracy and precision.” In order to meet that goal, scientists need to develop electronics that can better tolerate radiation.
         Researchers irradiated gallium nitride transistors for three days at temperatures up to one hundred and twenty-five degrees Celsius close to the core of The Ohio State University Research Reactor.
         Reed added, “We fully expected to kill the transistors on the third day, and they survived. The team pushed the transistors all the way to the reactor’s safety threshold which was seven hours at ninety percent power.”
         The gallium nitride transistors were able to withstand at least one hundred times higher accumulated dose of radiation than a standard silicon device, said researcher Dianne Ezell, leader of ORNL’s Nuclear and Extreme Environment Measurements group and a member of the transistor research team.
         She said that the transistor material must be able to survive at least five years, the normal maintenance window, in the pool of a nuclear reactor. The research team exposed the gallium nitride device to days of much higher radiation levels within the core itself. They concluded that the transistors would exceed that requirement.
         This is a critical technical advance as researchers turn from the large-scale existing fleet of nuclear energy plants to microreactors that could generate from tens to hundreds of megawatts of power. These novel reactor designs are still in the development and licensing stage. Their potential portability could allow them to be deployed on the back of a truck to a military or disaster zone.