The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Nuclear Weapons 286 – Sandia National Laboratory Invents Better Scintillators To Detect Smuggled Radioactive Materials

           Researchers at Sandia National Laboratories (SNL) have been working on the science of scintillators which can be used to detect nuclear threats. They have made a significant breakthrough that will allow such devices to be both more efficient and cheaper to make. The new scintillators are made of an organic glass which is a carbon-based material that can be melted but does not crystallize when it is cooled. It also does not become translucent or opaque when cooled.

            For forty years, the crystalline form of a molecule called trans-stibene has been the best material for scintillators. Trans-stibene can tell the difference between gamma rays which are common in the natural environment and neutrons which are primarily produced by materials such as plutonium and uranium which are dangerous radioactive materials that can be used to make weapons. Trans-stibene produces bright light in the presence of both of these types of radiation. Unfortunately, trans-stibene is very expensive to produce and is not common in devices used outside of a laboratory.

            The most common materials used in scintillators for use in the field are plastic. They are cheap and can be made into large shapes which is important for the sensitivity of the scintillator. Plastics are not good at distinguishing gamma rays and neutrons. The detectors have to include a tube of helium to make this distinction. The particular isotope of helium used for these tubes is rare, expensive and non-renewable which makes the detectors more expensive and complex. Plastics are also less sensitive and emit less light than trans-stibene.

          SNL began working on scintillator technology in 2010 with the goal “strengthen national security by improving the cost-to-performance ratio of radiation detectors at the front lines of all material moving into the country.” The team worked on combining the best and most sensitive scintillator material with the lower cost of less sensitive materials.

          The SNL team tested different scintillator materials that they had synthesized to better understand the relationship between molecular structures and radiation detection properties. They were able to create scintillator materials that could differentiate between dangerous radioactive materials that could be use for weapons and other non-threatening nuclear materials used in industry and medicine.

           A major breakthrough happened in June of 2016 with the realization that scintillators were a lot like light-emitting diodes (LEDs). LEDs produce light when electrical current is supplied to a material. Scintillators produce light when bombarded with radiation. Depending on the intensity of light and the speed of the appearance of the light, the nature of the radiation can be identified. It turned out that fluorine, a light emitting material used in some LEDs could be included in the scintillator compounds being made by the lab. This led to the best combination of features including stability, transparency and brightness.

           The organic glasses being developed at SNL are much brighter than the plastics and they can distinguish gamma rays from neutrons. The incorporation of fluorene yielded stable organics glasses that could be made into large shapes for detectors that could be deployed for wide use. The next step is to create prototype detectors that can be tested in real life conditions. The team also needs to give their new scintillators the ability to tell the difference between dangerous radioactive materials and normal-use radioactive materials. The National Nuclear Security Administration is funding the project for an additional two years. 

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 29, 2017

    Ambient office = 115 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Ambient outside = 148 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Soil exposed to rain water = 154 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Avocado from Central Market = 103 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Tap water = 116 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Filter water = 110 nanosieverts per hour  
     
  • Nuclear Reactors 286 – Cyberwarfare Poses Unacceptable Danger To U.S. Infrastructure Including Nuclear Power Plants

           In 2010, the Stuxnet computer worm was discovered in the centrifuge control systems in Iran’s nuclear program. It did a great deal of damage to the infected systems. It was designed to influence control systems for industrial equipment. Among other things, it caused some of the centrifuges to spin so fast that they were destroyed. Although neither country has admitted anything, it is commonly assumed that the U.S. and Israel created the worm to attack Iran and retard its nuclear program.

           There have been many hacking attacks on various public and private computer systems in the U.S. in the past decades. Pentagon computers have been accessed illegally raising national security concerns. Commercial databases have been hit and the financial and personal information of millions of Americans has stolen.

           The Russian attack on political party email systems and voting registration databases in 2016 influenced the U.S. Presidential and Congressional elections. It has not yet been revealed to what degree these attack may have altered the outcome of the elections. This sustained and massive attack on the computer systems that underpin our democracy has brought the issue of computer attacks to broader public awareness.

            There has been a growing concern over the last few years that major infrastructure like power systems in the U.S. might be attacked by malicious software in what is being called cyberwarfare. A television news show demonstrated how a computer attack could cause a generator at a power station to explode. Hydroelectric systems could be hacked to release water and flood downstream communities. Traffic systems could be hacked to cause massive traffic jams. Financial systems could be crashed wiping out billions of dollars. One of the biggest fears is that a computer attack on the systems that operate a nuclear power plant could cause a major nuclear accident that would threaten millions of people.

           This week, there was a major malware attack on companies around the world. The Petya virus was something called ransomware. In this type of attack, all the records on the infected computer are encrypted and the perpetrators then demand ransom in return for a key to decrypt the files. One of the targets hit in the attack was a nuclear power plant in Chernobyl. A system that monitored radiation levels was encrypted and the operators could not access the records of operations. They had to manually monitor radiation levels.

           Now ABC has reported that a U.S. nuclear power plant was also a victim of the ransomware attack. Fortunately the attack penetrated and encrypted administrative computer systems at the plant and did not hit any operational or safety systems. No safety alert was issued by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or the International Atomic Energy Agency. This indicates that attack posed little risk to public safety or the environment.

          As I have commented in the past, the level of computer security in the U.S. public and private computer systems is abysmal. Governmental computer systems at all levels are chronically underfunded and behind the latest technology including security. Private companies are too cheap to install decent security unless forced to by the government. Hopefully, this situation can be remedied before there is a truly horrific event like the melt down of a nuclear power plant.

    Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant:

     

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 28, 2017

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Ambient outside = 132 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Soil exposed to rain water = 137 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Heirloom tomato from Central Market = 85 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Filter water = 85 nanosieverts per hour  
     
  • Scientists Exposed To Uranium Particles At The National Criticality Experiments Research Center In 2014

           I recently wrote a post about problems at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. The LANL is not the only national laboratory with a poor record for safety. Other national labs transgressions have also been reported by government inspectors.

           In the spring of 2014, ninety-seven nuclear researchers from the U.S. and other countries convened in Nye County, NV. They met at the place where the U.S. had conducted hundreds of nuclear weapons tests. The testing of nuclear weapons at that site had ended. The scientists had come to the National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC) to use a piece of equipment called Godiva. The purpose of their visit was to test nuclear pulses.

           The Godiva machine had originally been located at Los Alamos, N.M. but was moved to Nevada nine years before the gathering of scientists. There was a cover for the machine that was intended to prevent the escape of any loose radioactive particles but that cover was not reinstalled after the move to Nevada.

            When Godiva was operating, it often set of radiation alarms at the NCERC so the staff decided to turn off the alarms. Unfortunately, the alarm system was designed to turn on ventilation and air filtration so when the alarms were shut off so was the ventilation system. The only operational ventilation system left was a small exhaust fan that moved air into a room where scientists watched next to the room where Godiva was located.

          The Godiva test runs were completed in mid May of 2014. On June 16th, routine tests of the facility revealed that there were radioactive particles in the room where the scientists had been working. When the room that contained the Godiva machine was tested, it was found to have twenty times more radiation than the adjacent room. The site operators had the rooms decontaminated. However, they did not notify and check the scientists who had attended the test sessions.

           On July 17th, a researcher at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California who had participated in the Godiva tests at NCERC had a routine exam for radiation exposure. Particles of highly enriched uranium were found in his urine. Following that revelation, National Securities Technologies, the lead contractor at the NCERC, tested the urine of NCERC staff members who had been in the Godiva room when the tests were being conducted. The results showed that three technicians had inhaled highly-enriched uranium.

           No public announcements of the findings were made. Eventually, all ninety seven scientists who had gathered for the Godiva tests were contacted. The testing of the group for radioactive exposure proceeded slowly and by 2016, it was found that thirty one of them had inhaled uranium. Though the amount of uranium was small, uranium particles can keep emitting radiation for years and pose a serious cancer risk. The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) said in a letter to the NCERC that the exposures were “safety-significant and preventable.”

           NCERC had been warned in 2010 that there could be problems with the Godiva machine installation. The warning even explicitly mentioned that there were concerns about the ventilation system. Even with advanced warning, workers and visiting scientists were still exposed to uranium particles. In other words, this exposure should not have and did not need to have happened.

           The Center for Public Integrity conducted a review of over sixty violations of safety regulations at ten federal nuclear weapons facilities. Their review said that the protective system for such facilities was dysfunctional. Contractors continued to make high profits while fines were often reduced or entirely waived. Auditors said that federal agencies such as the NNSA and the DoE which were supposed to overseen these facilities were so understaffed that contractors were basically left to police themselves.

           During the Cold War, there was great pressure to complete nuclear weapons projects as quickly as possible. A system evolved where profits were based on the ability to deliver results and safety issues took a back seat. Unfortunately, this culture of “profits first” still exists today. Some workers feel that “safety is completely gone.” 

  • Geiger Readings for Jun 27, 2017

    Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Ambient outside = 91 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Soil exposed to rain water = 81 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Bartlett pear from Central Market = 91 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Tap water = 121 nanosieverts per hour
     
    Filter water = 109 nanosieverts per hour  
     
  • Nuclear Reactors 285 – Sanctions on Qatar May Destabilize The World Helium Market And Lead To Record Price Increases

           Helium is a chemical element with He for the symbol and it has an atomic number of two. It is next most abundant element in the universe after hydrogen. About twenty four percent of the elemental mass of the universe is helium. It is a colorless, odorless, tasteless, non-toxic, inert, monatomic gas.

           Helium is rare on Earth. It is present in the atmosphere in the ratio of about five parts per million. Helium is naturally produced by radioactive decay of of elements such as uranium and thorium. There were concerns that the world supply of helium was declining but recent studies suggest that there may be great quantities of helium trapped in cavities far below the surface of the Earth.

           Helium is a very important element with many industrial uses including medical imaging, manufacturing and nuclear reactors. About a quarter of the helium produced in the world is used to cool superconducting magnets for MRI scanners. It is used as a protective atmosphere for arc welding and in processes that grow crystals for production of silicon wafers for electronics. Helium is a potential fuel for fusion reactors and is used as a coolant for the superconducting magnets that compress and restrain the plasma in the reactor. Russian companies are working on the Gas Turbine Modular Helium Reactor. It uses fast neutrons, is more efficient than conventional reactors and can transmute nuclear waste.

           The U.S. was an early producer of helium from natural gas deposits under the center of the country. The Helium Natural Gas Reserve was established in 1925 in Amarillo, Texas to store gas for blimps. In 1927, the Helium Control Act was passed to ban the export of helium. After World War II, the market for helium was depressed but expanding industrial demands such as the use of liquid helium as a coolant to create oxygen/hydrogen rocket fuel increased the market for and production of helium. After the Helium Acts Amendments of 1960, the U.S. created five production plants for helium and routed pipelines from them to the gas reserve in Texas.

           By 1995, there was a billion cubic meters of helium in the reserve and the reserve was over a billion dollars in debt. The Helium Privatization Act of 1996 directed the sale of the helium in the reserve and sales started in 2005. The U.S. had been the primary producer of helium for many years but then plants were built in other countries such as Qatar and Algeria. In 2012, the U.S. reserve held about thirty percent of the helium in the world. World demand and consumption increased and it was estimated that the U.S. would run out of helium from the reserve in 2018.

           In 2013, the biggest helium production plant went operational in Qatar. In 2014, the world helium supply passed demand briefly but continued increases in demand have led to concerns about supply and prices. In June of this year, a consortium of Gulf states in the Middle East with the support of the U.S. administration set up sanctions on Qatar because of supposed support for terrorist groups and activities. By this time, Qatar was supplying about one third of the helium being produced in the world. Analysts fear that the sanctions on Qatar could destabilize the world market and send prices to new heights. Although the U.S. still has major reserves of helium and helium producing fields and plants, it is unlikely that U.S. producers could make up for the shortfall that may be caused by the Qatar sanctions which call for a air, land and sea blockade of Qatari products including helium.

           The Qatar helium plants have been shut down and prices will soon rise. The thirteen demands on Qatar in order to have the sanctions lifted are being rejected by Qatar as an attempt to punish Qatar for its independence. The U.S. has supported the embargo so far but the U.S. has important military bases in Qatar and that may ultimately undermine U.S. support of the sanctions.

    Qatar helium plant: