Even as China has indicated its unwillingness to support India’s attempt to enter the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), the country will still go ahead with its plans to have 63,000 MW of nuclear capacity by 2032. timesofindia.indiatimes.com

The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
I have often blogged that ultimately it will be the market and public opinion that will kill off nuclear power. One or two more major accidents will sour the public and investors on nuclear power. Increasingly cheap alternative energy and rising costs for nuclear power will also doom nuclear as a source of electricity. Relevant to this point of view is the fact that the Ft. Calhoun nuclear power plant in Nebraska is being shut down because it could not compete in the marketplace.
The Fort Calhoun Nuclear Generating Station is located between Fort Calhoun and Blair, Nebraska next to the Missouri River. The plant began construction in 1966 and was put into operation in 1973. The plant has one pressurized water reactor that generates four hundred and seventy six megawatts at full power. The Omaha Public Power District owns the plant and it is operated by Exelon Nuclear Partners. The plant was originally licensed for forty years but had its license extended an additional twenty years to 2033 in 2003.
In April of 2011 the FCNGS was shut down for refueling. In May of 2011 the Missouri River flooded and the plant was surrounded by flood waters. Then in June, there was an electrical fire that shut off the supply of water to the spent fuel cooling pool for ninety minutes. Following the flood and the fire, there was a major inspection of the plant. It was discovered that the original design of the plant had some serious deficiencies and critics said that the plant should never have been licensed for operation in the first place. The plant remained shut down for three years while further inspections and repairs were carried out. It resumed operation in 2013.
Federal and state government have refused to provide subsidies or other support for the FCNGS on the basis of it being a low carbon energy source. The demand for electricity in the area is down due to slow economic growth. The plant has the smallest nuclear power reactor in the country and is not as competitive in the energy market as the bigger power reactors. For all these reasons, in June of 2016 the OPPD made the decision to shut down the FCNGS permanently even though it is licensed to operate for another seventeen years. The NRC does not permit nuclear power plants to operate if they cannot show a profit.
The power being generated by the reactor is being gradually reduced over a six month period. The fission process in the reactor is scheduled to stop completely in March of 2017. The plant will then be ready for decommissioning in November of 2017. The FCNGS will either be boarded up and fenced in for twenty to forty years in what is call a Safstor process before it is dismantled or it will be dismantled immediately in what is referred to as the Decon method.
As more licenses expire and more aging nuclear power plants become too expensive to compete in the energy marketplace and are closed, the number of nuclear power reactors operating in the U.S. will steadily decline. They will not be replaced by new nuclear power reactors but by alternative sustainable sources of energy. It is twilight for the age of nuclear power in the U.S.
Fort Calhoun Nuclear Generating Station:
In 2010 Russia and Turkey signed an agreement for the construction of the Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant which would consist of four nuclear reactors with an total capacity of forty eight hundred megawatts. The plant was to be operational by 2023. The Akkuyu plant is located in the Turkish province of Mersin. It is the first of three plants that Turkey is planning in order to reduce its dependency on importing foreign power. The estimated cost of the plant was twenty billion dollars. Rosatom, the Russian nuclear firm, was tapped to construct the plant. The plant will produce thirty five billion kilowatt-hours a year when completed. It will be licensed for a service life of sixty years.
A second nuclear power plant is slated to be constructed by a French-Japanese consortium in the city of Sinop near the Black Sea. A third nuclear power plant will be constructed in the Igneada district of the Turkish province of Kirklareli.
Cengiz Holdings is a Turkish construction firm that works of major energy infrastructure projects. They are currently building a thirteen hundred megawatt coal plant in the Turkish province of Canakkale. Cengiz Holdings is involved in the Akkuyu power plant project. They recently submitted the winning bid for construction of the Akkuyu power plant water intake for the cooling system. Rosatom wants to make use of Cengiz Holding’s experience in constructing power plants.
When Turkish air defenses shot down a Russia fighter on the border with Syria in November of 2015, there was a serious chill in Russian-Turkish relations. Russia took economic retaliation on Turkey, including a suspension of work on the Akkuyu power plant. Cengiz Holdings has offices in Russia. They decided to continue to operate those offices in spite of the problems between Turkey and Russia. They assumed that normal relations would be restored quickly and that work on the power plant would go forward. This was a wise decision on their part and the power plant project is once again progressing.
In April of 2016 Rosatom decided to sell up to forty nine percent of the Akkuyu power plant to Turkish investors. Cengiz Holdings is unable to provide a share of the financing and is seeking to partner with other Turkish firms which will assist in financing the project. Cengiz Holding says that they need to be involved in the financing because they need to be shareholders in order to take part in the management of the project.
Turkey is in a delicate position with respect to international relations. Russia is a major trading partner and a neighbor. On the other hand, Turkey is a member of NATO with strong ties to Europe and the U.S. The current conflict in Syria has brought Turkey into confrontation with Russia. Recently, there has been tension between Turkey and NATO over the Syrian refugee crisis. Erdogan, the President of Turkey has been walking a tightrope playing the NATO and the U.S. against Russia. It will be interesting to see how successful Erdogan will be in the game of international politics.
Artist’s concept of Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant (Image: AEP):