Governments that reject nuclear power are speeding up action on reducing carbon emissions and the adoption of renewable energy sources. eco-business.com
The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
Belarus is an eastern European country that is bordered by Russia to the northeast, Ukraine to the south, Poland to the west, and Lithuania and Latvia to the northwest. It was once a member of the Soviet Union. During the early 1980s, Belarus was working on the creation of a nuclear power plant but the1986 Chernobyl reactor accident in nearby Ukraine put those plans on hold. Problems with adequate power generation in 2007 reignited interest in build a nuclear power plant.
Environmentalists in Belarus had come out strongly against nuclear power in 2005 even before the project to build the plant was even restarted. In 2006, Ecodom organized a formal anti-nuclear movement. There was a Belarusian Anti-Nuclear Campaign in 2008 that brought together many of the anti-nuclear groups and parties.
In the meantime, plans were made and changed for the reactor project. A Russian loan of two billion dollars was secured in 2009. Also in 2009, legal disputes with Ukraine over treaty violations arose and various courts and agencies got involved. In 2011 a contract was signed with Rosatom, the Russian-owned nuclear company for the construction of two VVER-1200 Russian reactors which will generate two billion four hundred million watts. Construction began in 2013 at the Astravets (Ostrovets) site in Hrodna Voblast, on the Belarus border 28 miles from Vilnius, Lithuania. From the start, the government was reluctant to allow reporters to visit the construction site.
In 2005, a survey of Belarusians found that only twenty eight percent supported nuclear power. The government worked hard to suppress the opposition to nuclear power. Among other tactics, they supported non-profit organizations that were pro-nuclear. The effort to bolster support within the Belarusian public was so successful that by 2016, with the construction of the plant well underway, a new survey revealed that over fifty percent of the Belarusians now supported nuclear power.
In April of 1016, a supporting structure collapsed in a maintenance building on the construction site. Although a construction worker told reporters that the event had taken place, the project managers claimed that it had not happened. When the Ministry of Energy admitted the incident later, they said that it was not that significant.
On July 10 this year, the reactor casing which weighs over three hundred tons, fell about to the ground from a height of about nine feet. This time, ten people who worked at the site passed information to the media but again the management claimed that it did not happen. Finally, the incident was officially admitted on July 25th. The management swore that safety was of the greatest importance on the project. Rosatom said that even though their tests showed no damage to the reactor casing, they would replace it to ” mitigate rumors and panic among the population.”
On August 26th, an oxygen tank exploded and killed a worker. This string of accidents has caused the public and the media to question the honesty and competence of those in charge of the nuclear plant project. The Belarus media is asking the Ministry of Energy tough questions including whether they would have ever reported the accidents if whistleblowers had not informed the reporters. Rosatom was also accused of being more interested in making money than in the long term safety of the project.
It appears that Belarus will have its nuclear power plant. Unfortunately for the citizens, it also appears that the government, contractor and management involved in the project are more interested in controlling and suppressing any information about accidents and problems than informing the public. This attitude could ultimately result in a serious nuclear accident at the plant.
Belarus nuclear power plant:
I have often written about North Korea and its nuclear program. North Korea is thought to have a few nuclear bombs and it often threatens to attack South Korea and the United States over perceived threats. South Korea does not have nuclear weapons and relies on the nuclear arsenal of the United States, the conventional forces of the US and other allied nations and the U.S. Patriot missile defense system in S.K. to protect it from hostiles nations including North Korea which has nuclear weapons. Recently, Donald Trump, the candidate for U.S. President has mentioned that it might be a good idea for South Korea to develop its own nuclear weapons for its own defense.
In the last year, N. K. has demonstrated a number of advancements in its military capabilities. N.K. has
· Launched a satellite with its big Unha rocket.
· Shown a second generation international continental ballistic missile.
· Presented images of what it says is a miniaturized nuclear warhead that could be fitted to a ballistic missile.
· Tested a N.K. air defense missile that appears to be based on the design of the Russia S-300 missile.
· Flight tested the Musudan intermediate range ballistic missile.
· Tested an underwater solid propellant sea-launched ballistic missile which appears to be based on the design of the Soviet SSN 6.
In response to the growing threat of N.K. missile capability, the U.S. and S.K. have announced plans to build an additional THAAD missile defense system in 2018. The U.S. and S.K. are conducting a series of joint training exercises to demonstrate readiness to repel any N.K. attack. Two weeks ago, the U.S. flew three different types of USAF strategic bombers in what was called a “integrated bomber deterrent operation in the Indo-Asian-Pacific region. The B-1B Lancer, the B-2 Spirit and the B-52 Stratofortress all flew in the exercise.
N.K. got very upset with these U.S. and S.K. actions and threatened to preemptively start a nuclear war if they felt that there was any threat of an actual invasion of N.K. by the U.S. and S.K. The N.K. foreign minister said that the “U.S. never ending nuclear blackmail will make American pay a terrifying price.”
China also expressed disapproval of the U.S. and S.K. actions. China said that in addition to being able to deter N.K. missile attacks against S.K., the new THAAD missile defense system that was being planned could also be used against China in any conflict in the South China Sea. China even suggested that U.S. actions had been the cause of the recent N.K. missile tests. The Chinese U.N. Ambassador has requested that the U.S. “de-escalate the situation” by refraining from provoking N.K.
It would be unwise for the U.S. to withdraw its protection from S.K. A desperate N.K. might decide to invade S.K. at any time and could conceivably use nuclear weapons. U.S. military planner have concluded that N.K. is on the way to developing the capability to hit the U.S. mainland with nuclear weapons. It would be best for the U.S. to stay involved with S.K. in opposing the militarism of N.K. With U.S. forces on the Korean Peninsula and U.S. missile defense systems located in S.K., any aggressive actions by N.K. could be quickly and decisively dealt with.
North (Green) and South Korea (Orange):