The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for May 28, 2024

    Geiger Readings for May 28, 2024

    Ambient office = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 117 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Corn from Central Market = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 146 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 137 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1398 – The U.S. Government Is Promoting Nuclear Power For Data Centers – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1398 – The U.S. Government Is Promoting Nuclear Power For Data Centers – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         The White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy is strongly backing nuclear power a reliable and sustainable energy source for data centers.
         About two years ago, nuclear energy was unwelcome as an important source of energy. One of the keynote speeches at Data Center World 2024 was delivered by Rian Bahran, Ph.D., Assistant Director of White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. He suggested a broadening of the definition of clean energy to include nuclear. This has opened the door to a reversal of the long-term trend of closing nuclear power facilities. It also heightened advocacy for onsite nuclear power in large data centers.
         Bahran began on familiar ground. Data centers account for one to two percent of annual US energy consumption. In key metros, nuclear power consumption is much higher. Combined with pressure on the grid and the hefty power demands occasioned by AI, new ways need to be found to power data centers efficiently and sustainably. 
         One possible option is to site a new data center beside a nuclear power plant. Amazon Web Services (AWS) has acquired a twelve hundred acre data hub known as the Cumulus data center campus in Berwick, PA. It is directly connected to the two and a half billion gigawatt Susquehanna Steam Electric Station (a nuclear plant). An existing forty eight megawatt data center was already operating at the site. AWS plans to eventually extend that to as much as nine hundred and sixty megawatts. In order to power it, the company has entered into a ten-year plus energy supply agreement with Talen, the current owner of the nuclear plant.
         Bahran said, “Wind and solar play a major role in decarbonization but we need a stable and firm nuclear backbone. Nuclear and renewables can be complementary.”
         As a suggested alternative to huge new nuclear facilities, another way to introduce nuclear is small modular reactors (SMRs). Each SMR can generate an average of seventy seven megawatts.
         Britt Burt is an energy analyst at research firm Industrial Info Resources. He said, “Hopes are rising about SMRs. About two gigawatts of new-build nuclear is scheduled to begin construction during the next five years.”
         Data center operator Standard Power is planning to deploy up to two dozen SMRs on two data center campuses in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Reactors built by ENTRA1 will use SMR technology from NuScale Power. NuScale already has an SMR design approved by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). NE Edge plans to build a one and a half million square foot data center campus beside a Dominion Energy nuclear power plant in Waterford, Connecticut.
         Bahran made comparisons between a conventional reactor, SMR, and microreactor in terms of their sizes and generated power.
         He said, “The latest generation of SMRs have small footprints, greater safety, better seismic capabilities, and provide reliable electricity.Small nuclear designs can grow modularly as the data center grows and won’t need to be refueled for up to eight years.”
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for May 27, 2024

    Geiger Readings for May 27, 2024

    Ambient office = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 123 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 122 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 68 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 79 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for May 26, 2024

    Geiger Readings for May 26, 2024

    Ambient office = 62 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 110 nanosieverts per hour

    Avocado from Central Market = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 91 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 77 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for May 25, 2024

    Geiger Readings for May 25, 2024

    Ambient office = 56 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Asparagus from Central Market = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 89 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 113 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1397 – Pacific Gas & Electric Is Working On Restarting Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Reactors 1397 – Pacific Gas & Electric Is Working On Restarting Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
        If the state decides to extend its current five-year PG&E extension approval through 2030, the federal approval will already be in place.
         Those opposed to license extension are also proceeding with their attempts to get the plant to shut down as scheduled.
         Three climate activist groups filed a motion for the immediate closure of Diablo in March of 2024. They said that the nuclear plant poses an “unacceptable safety risk.”
         San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, Environmental Working Group, and Friends of the Earth also requested a hearing with the NRC to force the agency to consider the groups’ safety concerns.
         The groups say the location of the Diablo Canyon plant near earthquake faults makes it susceptible to an earthquake that could cause a catastrophic nuclear meltdown.
         Zawalick countered, “So, Diablo Canyon is the most studied region, from a seismic standpoint of any nuclear plant in the United States and possibly the world, as a condition of our original license to operate these plants and it will continue into extended operations.”
         However, the environmental groups’ court filing also says keeping the plant open “hurts the state’s shift to safe, renewable energy and prolongs the risk of disaster at the plant.”
         Jane Swanson is one of the original members of Mothers for Peace. She said, “It inputs 24/7. You can’t ramp up and down a nuclear power plant on the basis of need because it’s too dangerous. That’s how things get out of control. And so, as long as it’s inputting this into the western grid, you can’t add more renewables, so it’s counterintuitive but this big source of electricity is blocking the addition of some renewables.”
         Even with CPUC approval and NRC application review, there are several more agencies which have yet to weigh in. They could derail the license extension process. The agencies include the California Coastal Commission, the California State Lands Commission, the California Energy Commission, and the California Air Resources Board.
         Currently, PG&E is moving forward on two different tracks. It is planning for continued operation (the plant’s Unit 2 reactor is currently being refueled) and planning for the plant’s eventual decommissioning.
         Zawalick said, “The state has a few more to do. So now, I just say that we continue to, like every nuclear plant is, planning for decommissioning no matter where you are on the timeline.
         Whether it is five, ten or twenty years from now, the Diablo Canyon plant will eventually need to be shut down. On Wednesday, May 22, the Diablo Canyon Decommissioning Engagement Panel hosted an in-person and virtual meeting from 6-9 p.m. at the Atascadero City Hall. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss how the seven-hundred-and-fifty-acre site on which Diablo Canyon Power Plant is located could be repurposed in the future.
         Also on Wednesday, the NRC’s Atomic Safety and Licensing Board heard oral arguments on the petition from Mothers for Peace, the Environmental Working Group, and Friends of the Earth. The hearing will be held at NRC headquarters in Rockville, Maryland.