Proposed following the Fukushima accident, these four EDF regional nuclear emergency bases will be capable of rapidly responding to a serious accident at any French nuclear power plant. world-news-nuclear.com

The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.
Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.
Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.
Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.
Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb
Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?
The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.
What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?
“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.
I try not to get too angry when I read about the misdeeds of companies handling radioactive waste but sometimes it is difficult. Many of my blogs focus on the nuclear industry, nuclear reactors and their waste, mining of uranium, nuclear weapons, etc. but today I am going to talk about an industry that at first glance is not related to nuclear issues. I am talking about fracking.
The fracking industry is raping the landscape all over this country, polluting the aquifers and ground water and causing earthquakes, in the quest for cheap natural gas. Although inexpensive natural gas is eroding the support for building more nuclear reactors, one of the waste products in the sludge pumped out of fracking wells consists of natural radioactive uranium in the soil and rock which also contains trace amounts of radium. Radium is very dangerous to biological systems. During fracking operations, there are large cloth filters that capture some of the uranium and radium from fracking operations as waste is pumped out of fracking wells.
North Dakota is home to major fracking operations. An estimated seventy five tons of fracking waste is being pumped out of fracking wells daily in ND. Fracking filters cannot be disposed of in North Dakota landfills if they are emitting more than five picocuries. There are no disposal options in ND for filters emitting more than five picocuries. If companies are caught trying to dispose of such filters in ND landfills, the fine is a thousand dollars a filter. It has been reported that many filters are being improperly disposed of in ND to avoid the cost of shipping them out of state to a legal disposal area.
An Indian reservation found that fracking filters were being tossed into dumpsters and garbage cans on the reservation. Whole flat bed truck trailers full of bags of fracking filters have been found abandoned along ND roads. In the tiny town of Noonan near the Canadian border, old buildings on the property of a closed gas station were found to contain hundreds of bags of highly radioactive fracking filters. The owner of the property is a fugitive wanted on larceny charges. It is unclear whether or not the owner is aware of and complicit in the use his buildings for dumping fracking filters.
The State of North Dakota has no office or staff that is monitoring and attempting to control the illegal dumping of fracking filters in ND. This is a horrible example of an polluting industry moving into a poor state and just doing anything it wants to make a profit. All of the pretty ads about clean cheap natural gas that are appearing on TV are based on a lie. The gas is cheap because the people drilling and operating the fracking wells are dumping the environmental damage and public health threats on the citizens of ND and pocketing the profits from selling the natural gas. If the actual damage to the ecosystem were to be factored into the cost of natural gas, it would not be anywhere near as cheap as is being advertised. I have seen studies that indicate that if the environmental costs of fracked natural gas are factored in, it is no cleaner that burning coal in power plants. The illegal dumping of fracking filters in ND as if it were one big garbage dump is an outrage and if the State of North Dakota cannot afford to stop it, then the Federal government should get involved and prosecute the dumpers.
Illegally abandoned fracking filters in North Dakota:
Recently, I blogged about the accidents at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) near Carlsbad, New Mexico which included an accidental release of radiation into the environment. Something happened in the underground repository for plutonium and americium contaminated nuclear waste materials generated by the U.S. nuclear weapons program. The cause and nature of the accident that released the radioactive materials was unknown at the time of my last blog around February 28, 2013. Thirteen workers were known to have been exposed to radiation but the location where the accident occurred was too radioactive to be investigated. There have been a number of news items published since then and I decided that it was time to put together another blog with update about the WIPP situation.
The two scenarios that are being considered were anticipated during the construction of WIPP. The first scenario concerns the possibility that a drum of waste spontaneously combusted and ruptured, spilling the contents. The Department of Energy (DOE) said that there was a one in ten thousand chance that this would happen in any particular year of operation.
The second scenario dealt with the possibility that a portion of the roof could collapse and crush a number of drums of waste, releasing their contents. Two roof collapses occurred in the salt caverns during the stress tests twenty years ago. The DOE gave this occurrence a one in a million chance of happening in any particular year of operation. Considering that the facility has only been in use for about twenty years, the DOE is either wrong in its projections or the WIPP has had really bad luck.
There was a public meeting on March 6 where the DOE tried to reassure residents of the area that there was no danger to the public although americium was detected up to eleven miles from the facility. Residents have complained that they were not given enough information about the accident to be confident in what the DOE was saying. If ingested or inhaled, americium tends to accumulate in the bones, liver and muscle. The exposure of tissue to the radiation emitted by americium can result in the development of cancer.
A few days ago, doctors confirmed that a total of seventeen workers at WIPP had been exposed to radiation from the accident. It has also been confirmed that radiation has reached the town of Carlsbad which is twenty six miles from the facility. Once again, authorities are saying that the amount of radiation that reached Carlsbad does not pose a public health threat.
The operators at WIPP are waiting for the radiation to subside so they can enter the damaged area and find out what actually happened. Once again, a nuclear facility has been the victim of an accident that was supposed to be almost impossible. And, once again, although radiation has been released into the environment, the authorities are saying that there is no danger to the people who live in the area. I am afraid that I lack confidence in the projections and pronouncements of the Department of Energy when it comes to nuclear accidents. However, there is one projection about WIPP that I do believe. The operators at WIPP have said that the facility will be out of operation for a protracted period of time.
Drums of waste in the WIPP:
There are claims that US officials hid concerns as Fukushima melted. enenews.com
Germany increased its carbon dioxide emissions for the second year in a row due to its Energiewende policies and the effects of global fuel markets. world-nuclear-news.com
In this blog, I alternate posts between general and timely topics involving radioactivity. Today, I am going to blog about the situation in Ukraine. Ukraine uses nuclear power generation. The question I am interested in is what happened with the nuclear reactors during the recent political turbulence.
Ukraine has fifteen reactors at four locations, all operated by Energoatom. Energoatom’s full name is the National Nuclear Energy Generating Company of Ukraine. It is a Ukraine state enterprise. Ukraine is seventh in the world in terms of nuclear power generation with almost half of their electricity being generated by the four nuclear power stations.
All of the Ukrainian reactors are based on the Russian VVER design with most of the units generating a gigawatt of electricity. Twelve of the fifteen reactors are currently operating with the other three shut down for scheduled maintenance. During the recent political upheaval, the reactors have continued to operate normally but security has been upgraded at all four nuclear power stations.
Energoatom says that they have enough fuel in house or scheduled for delivery to operated for March and April. However, although their purchase of fuel for coming months has been paid for, TVEL, the Russian nuclear fuel company, may not be able to deliver the fuel because of a new ban on transport of nuclear fuel across Ukraine. TVEL says that European nations that depend on Russian nuclear fuel will still be supplied but alternate travel routes that exclude Ukraine will have to be found.
A partnership consisting of Energoatom and TVEL is in the process of constructing a fuel cycle plant in central Ukraine near the village of Smoline. It will supply fuel to the Ukrainian reactors. The first stage of production will be completed in 2015 if the political issues between Russia and Ukraine do not interfere with the project. The first phase facility will be able to produce eight hundred fuel assemblies per year.
Westinghouse supplied fuel assemblies to Ukraine for tests between 2005 and 2009. Unfortunately for Ukraine’s need to have energy independence from Russia, the tests were considered a failure. Ukraine said that the defects in the fuel assemblies led to a long shutdown of one of their reactors. Westinghouse countered with the claim that the Ukrainians created problems because they did not load the fuel correctly. That seems hard to believe given that they have been loading fuel into their reactors for decades without major outages.
Most of the recent focus with respect to energy in Ukraine has been on natural gas. The Russians supply large amounts of natural gas to Ukraine and most of the gas that Russian ships to Eastern and Western Europe goes through Ukraine pipelines. If there is further decline in relations between Ukraine and Russia, other European countries could suffer a reduction in natural gas supplies from Russia. In addition, there is also a concern about the supply of electricity from nuclear power in Ukraine if nuclear fuel shipments to Ukraine are halted. As with natural gas, if Russia maintains its ban on shipping nuclear fuel across Ukraine to European countries, some European countries may experience shortfalls in their production of electricity from nuclear power. It is in the interest of the whole world that Ukraine and Russia find a peaceful resolution to their political conflict.
Energoatom logo:
Some of the smallest children in Koriyama, a short drive from the crippled Fukushima nuclear plant, barely know what it’s like to play outside. voiceofrussia.com
Unit 2 at Nine Mile Point in upstate New York is back online after the failure of an uninterruptible power supply prompted operators to shut it down last week. nuclearstreet.com