
Blog
-
Geiger Readings for February 2, 2013
Ambient office = 74 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 87 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 90 nanosieverts per hourVine ripened tomato from Top Foods = 67 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 118 nanosieverts per hourFiltered water =123 nanosieverts per hour -
Radiation News Roundup February 1, 2013
Tons of Fukushima radioactive waste are kept in an area beyond Tokyo, 150 miles from reactors. enenews.com
Can governments be trusted to tell the truth about the Sellafield nuclear leak? the-tap.blogspot.com
Southern Co. announced Wednesday that it has filed the paperwork for a loan guarantee that’s been under negotiation since 2010 for new reactors at Plant Vogtle. nuclearstreet.com
-
Radiation News Roundup February 1, 2013
Tons of Fukushima radioactive waste are kept in an area beyond Tokyo, 150 miles from reactors. enenews.com
Can governments be trusted to tell the truth about the Sellafield nuclear leak? the-tap.blogspot.com
Southern Co. announced Wednesday that it has filed the paperwork for a loan guarantee that’s been under negotiation since 2010 for new reactors at Plant Vogtle. nuclearstreet.com
-
Geiger Readings for February 1, 2013
Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 109 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 92 nanosieverts per hourVine ripened tomato from Top Foods = 92 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 118 nanosieverts per hourFiltered water =111 nanosieverts per hourAlaskan Copper River Salmon = 99 nanosieverts per hour -
Nuclear Reactors 101 – Russian Assistance in Ukraine Nuclear Program
In my last post, I talked about how there is a civil war brewing in Ukraine over Russian involvement in Ukrainian affairs. There is a substantial Russian minority in Ukraine. During the Soviet years, Ukraine was the second most powerful member of the Soviet Union after Russia but it was ultimately controlled by the central Soviet government. Since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia has often exerted strong influence over Ukraine politics via its economic and technical assistance.
Last year, the Smolino site in Kirovograd Region of Ukraine was being prepared for the construction of nuclear fuel production plant. The plant is supposed to begin producing nuclear fuel in 2020 and it is hoped that it will ultimately be producing eight hundred fuel assemblies per year. A joint venture company was formed to build the plant. The Nuclear Fuel State Concern of Ukraine and TVEL, a subsidiary of Rosatom, the Russian state enterprise are partners in the new company. Seventy percent of the cost of the project is to come in the form of a Russian loan and the rest from investors of the two countries. TVEL beat out Westinghouse in 2010 for the international tender issued by Ukraine.
Advanced Russian nuclear fuel technology referred to TVSA-12 fuel assemblies has already been introduced in Ukraine reactors. The new Ukraine nuclear fuel plant will utilize the TVSA technology to produce nuclear fuel. There will be a WWER-1000 nuclear reactor at the plant.
Ironically, the Smolino nuclear fuel plant is being advertised by TVEL, the Russian half of the joint partnership, as a way for Ukraine to become independent of the need for outside energy assistance. (Perhaps TVEL means independent of help from anyone but Russia.) Russia is pushing hard to become a major supplier of nuclear technology to other countries in Eastern Europe and TVEL says that both Russia and Ukraine will benefit from this partnership to produce nuclear fuel. Ukraine gets fifty percent of its power from nuclear power so the ability produce its own nuclear fuel would be advantageous. Ukraine is currently dependent on massive imports of natural gas from Russia. There is also the claim that this new plant will produce more jobs for Ukraine.
This is the first such major nuclear project between Russia and Ukraine. It was hoped that this project would be the beginning of a continuing partnership in the production of nuclear fuel and nuclear technology for export to other countries. On the other hand, a Russian nuclear expert expressed doubts that this fuel plant would have a major impact on the nuclear market in Eastern Europe because the fuel assemblies that it produces will be mainly used in the Ukrainian reactors. It is also clear that the deep involvement of the Rosatom subsidiary, TVEL, will mean that Russia will exert major influence in the management of the nuclear fuel plant. So much for Ukrainian energy independence.
The big question is what effect a change of government in Ukraine will have on this partnership. With the hostility of the protester in Ukraine to the involvement of Russia in Ukrainian affairs, it very well may turn out that even if the nuclear fuel plant is completed, further partnerships between Russia and Ukraine in the nuclear marketplace will not materialize.
Smolino nuclear fuel plant in Ukraine:
-
Radiation News Roundup January 31, 2013
As the Davis-Besse nuclear power plant prepares to begin work to replace its steam generators, the plant’s operator is highlighting the benefits to the local economy from the operation. world-nuclear-news.org
Inspections during a refueling outage have turned up flaws in the housing of control rod drive mechanisms at the Palisades nuclear plant. nuclearstreet.com
-
Geiger Readings for January 31, 2013
Ambient office = 106 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 79 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 79 nanosieverts per hourRed seedless grapes from Top Foods = 91 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 129 nanosieverts per hourFiltered water =109 nanosieverts per hour -
Nuclear Reactors 100 – Threats Against Nuclear Reactors in Ukraine
There are many different important issues when considering nuclear power. I have spent a lot of time on the threat nuclear weapons and the environmental, health, technical and economic issues of nuclear reactors. I have posted blogs that dealt with the possibilities that terrorists could target nuclear reactors and/or nuclear waste storage. I have even mentioned that if Russia succeeds in building reactors in third world countries, they could apply economic pressure to those countries by threatening to shut off the reactors if the other countries do not comply with Russian demands. Of course, nuclear reactors would be prime targets in wars because they would deny the enemy huge amounts of electrical power. But recently, there have reports of the possible role of nuclear reactors in the internal power struggles with in a single country. This is a subject that I have not covered.
There is a complicated struggle for control of Ukraine. The President and the recent government have been oriented toward cooperation with the Russians. The mass of the people are fed up with Russian interferences in the affairs of Ukraine and would like to turn toward Europe and the European Union for economic assistance. For weeks there has been a battle between police and government security forces and protesters in Ukraine. It has been becoming increasingly violent as both sides dig in for what must be seen as the possible opening battles of a full out civil war. A few days ago, the Ukrainian President accepted the resignation of the whole government in an attempt to appease the protesters after an attempt to buy them off with promises of participation in the government failed.
The Security Service of Ukraine has issued a statement with respect to the on-going conflict. They say that anonymous parties have threatened to sabotage critical infrastructure in Ukraine unless their demands are met. Along with threats to bomb hydroelectric power installations, there have also been threats against the nuclear power plants in Ukraine. There are currently four nuclear power plants in Ukraine with fifteen operating reactors. I have blogged about the vulnerabilities of nuclear reactors to attacks in the past. Reactors are highly complex machines which can be directly stopped or destroyed in many ways. They store spent nuclear fuel which would be an excellent target for a saboteur. All reactors require a huge amount of cooling water, the blocking of which is another way that reactors could be stopped.
Blowing up a reactor in Ukraine would cause widespread environmental devastation, public health impacts and economic disaster. While it is difficult to understand the logic of a protester who would do such a thing to their own country, it should never be doubted that there are such people in all societies. If Ukrainian reactors are attacked, it will be the first use of nuclear terrorism in a civil war. And, the damage would reach far beyond Ukraine into other countries in the area.
Zaporizhia Nuclear Power Station in Ukraine, the biggest nuclear power plant in Europe:
-
Geiger Readings for January 30, 2013
Ambient office = 74 nanosieverts per hourAmbient outside = 80 nanosieverts per hourSoil exposed to rain water = 65 nanosieverts per hourHoney Crisp apple from Top Foods = 83 nanosieverts per hourTap water = 76 nanosieverts per hourFiltered water = 65 nanosieverts per hour