The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • U.S. Nuclear Reactors 18 – Brunswick, North Carolina

                   The Brunswick Nuclear Generating Station is located near Southport, North Carolina on the Atlantic coast. It draws cooling water from the Cape Fear River and discharges the heated water into the Atlantic Ocean. The plant contains two nine hundred and ninety megawatt General Electric boiling water reactors. The plant was built by Carolina Power & Light Company. Eighty two percent of the plant is currently owned by Progress Energy which also operates the plant. North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency owns the remaining eighteen percent. The plant was put into operation in 1975 with a forty year license. The plant was granted an extended license in 2006 to 2035.

                The population in the NRC plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of ten miles around the plant contains about thirty six thousand people. The NRC ingestion pathway zone with a radius of fifty miles around the plant contains about four hundred and sixty eight thousand people. The NRC estimates that there is a moderate risk of an earthquake that could damage the plant. The plant is vulnerable to hurricanes coming in from the Atlantic Ocean.

                 In 1992, the NRC proposed a fine for Brunswick because of problems with air intake valves and poor maintenance of emergency diesel generators. The NRC had known about problems at the plant for years but had allowed it to continue to operate. The building housing the emergency generators had not been constructed properly and could not withstand an earthquake. Eight five percent of the bolts in the walls were either substandard or fakes. The operators had known about the problem since 1987 but had not taken any steps to fix it. The reactors were shut down to fix the structural problems in 1992. Unit 1 was shut down for two years while NRC mandated repairs were performed. Unit 2 required a year for repairs.

                 There were also severe management problems at the plant with inadequate training, poor oversight and frequent changes of management and staff. Equipment at the plant was allowed to deteriorate and corrode without proper maintenance. Many necessary repairs were not performed. Funds were not always provided for critical repairs.

                 We have blogged about other reactors that had problems with construction but this is the first time I have encountered a situation where outright fraud was perpetrated during construction. Heads of bolts were cut off and attached to the walls to make it look like there were bolts that attached the walls to the steel supports. Once again, the operators of a reactor ignored warnings from the NRC and their own people about ongoing problems. Once again the NRC failed to halt operations of a plant that had serious long term problems. The management was incompetent and concerns of the staff were ignored. Routine maintenance was not carried out, repairs were not made and funds were not available to deal with difficult problems. Given the wretched history of this nuclear plant, the NRC should not have granted an extension of the license in 2006.

    Photo by Jonathan Hass:

     

  • Geiger Readings for March 14, 2013

    Latitude 47.704656 Longitude -122.318745

    Geiger Counter Readings in Seattle, WA on March 14 , 2013

    Ambient office = .098 microsieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = .083 microsieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain = .089 microsieverts per hour

    Bulk raw peanuts  from grocery store  = .090 microsieverts per hour

    Tap water = .117 microsieverts per hour

    Filtered water = .114 microsieverts per hour

  • U.S. Nuclear Reactors 16 – Salem, New Jersey

                  The Salem Nuclear Power Plant is located on Artificial Island in the Delaware Bay of New Jersey. It contains two Westinghouse pressurized water reactors which together can generate two thousand two hundred and seventy five megawatts of electricity.  Unit One began commercial operation in 1977 and was licensed for forty years of operation. Unit Two began commercial operation in 1981 and was licensed for forty years of operation. The plant is owned by PSEG Nuclear LLC and Exelon Generation LLC. In 2009, the reactors at the plant were granted extended licenses, Unit One to 2036 and Unit Two to 2040.

                 The population in the NRC plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of ten miles around the plant contains about fifty thousand people. The NRC ingestion pathway zone with a radius of fifty miles around the plant contains about five million four hundred and eighty thousand people. The NRC estimates that there is a very low risk of an earthquake that could damage the plant.

                  In 1995, the operators shut down Unit One because the ventilation fans for the electrical switchgear rooms were not functioning. The NRC had been tracking performance decline at the plant for years at the Salem plant but had allowed operations to continue.  A month after Unit One was shut down, Unit Two went into automatic shutdown. The NRC had identified forty three technical issues and twenty one programmatic issues. Among the problems were leaky generators, unreliable reactor controls and workers who were afraid of retaliation if they reported problems. The NRC told the Salem operators that they should not restart either reactor until the problems had been fixed. The steam generator tubes in Unit One showed extensive cracking so the Salem operators worked to restart Unit Two first while they repaired Unit One. The repairs to Unit Two took two years. Ultimately, the operators bought new steam generators for Unit One. It took three years to fix all the problems at Unit One.

              The reactors at Salem are cooled by water drawn from Delaware Bay. Sometimes layers of grass clog the intake pipes and the reactors run at reduced power for weeks. The coastal flooding that came with Hurricane Sandy in 2012 caused the operators of the plant to shut down Unit One because four of the six recirculation pumps were no longer available. Non-radioactive steam had to be vented into the atmosphere because the pumps were off.

              Critics of the NRC have pointed out that the NRC knew of most of the problems for years before the plant was shut down for fixes in 1995. Once again we have design problems, equipment breakdowns that were not promptly fixed and management that appeared to be more interested in profits than safety. Fouling of intake pipes is either a matter of poor design or poor maintenance. Global climate change will result in more extreme events like Hurricane Sandy that will threaten reactors on the shore of the Atlantic Ocean.

  • Geiger Readings for March 13, 2013

    Geiger Counter Readings in Seattle, WA on March 13 , 2013

    Ambient office = .097 microsieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = .159 microsieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain = .058 microsieverts per hour

    Banana from grocery store  = .131 microsieverts per hour

    Tap water = .104 microsieverts per hour

    Filtered water = .063 microsieverts per hour

  • U.S. Nuclear Reactors 16 – Browns Ferry, Alabama

                 The Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant is located on the Tennessee River on the north shore of Wheeler Lake in northern Alabama near Decatur and Athens. The plant has three General Electric boiling water reactors that can each generate about one thousand one hundred megawatts. Unit One began operating in 1973, Unit Two in 1974 and Unit Three in 1976. The plant was built and is owned and operated by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). It went into operation in 1974. In 2006, the NRC licensed all three reactors for another twenty years.

           The population in the NRC plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of ten miles around the plant contains about forty thousand people. The NRC ingestion pathway zone with a radius of fifty miles around the plant contains about one million people. The NRC estimates that there is an extremely low risk of an earthquake that could damage the plant. The plant is vulnerable to tornados and has had to be shut down because a tornado cut off external power to the site.

            Unit One was damaged by a fire in 1975 and had to be shut down for a year for repairs. Temporary flammable sealing in the cable spreading room was set afire by a worker using a candle to check for air leaks and the fire spread through the control cabling for Unit One and Unit Two. This fire prompted review of and changes to the NRC fire codes for nuclear reactors. In 1985, all three reactors at the plant were shut down due to operational and management problems. In 2002, the TVA began work on restoring Unit 1 to operation and spent one billion eight hundred million to fix the reactor’s problems. Unit 1 finally began operating again in 2007.

            Unit 2 was shut down in 1985 along with the other units. The necessary repairs and changes were made and Unit 2 was brought back into operation in 1991. In 2007, Unit Two had to be shut down for a day because the temperature of the water in the Tennessee River was too high for cooling water to be drawn from the river.

            Unit Three was shut down in 1983 to inspect the recirculation system and remain out of service until 1984 when repairs were finished. In 1984, the water level in the reactor dropped below the safe level but the automatic safety equipment did not function. In 1985, the reactor was shut down to investigate problems with the instrumentation and other equipment. Unit Three was finally restarted in 1995 with at a cost of one billion four hundred thousand dollars.

            Following the shutdown of all three Units in 1985, problems with equipment design and maintenance as well as poor training of the staff were identified. Senior managers brought in in 1986 to oversee repairs were found to have violated ethical standards. In 1987, almost thirty percent of the staff was found to be unqualified for their positions. In 1988 and 1989, the plant was found to be non-compliant with new fire protection regulations that had been prompted by the fire in Unit One in 1975. Many of these problems had been seen in the years before 1985 but the plant was allowed to continue to operate. It was reported by a watchdog group that the plant management allowed quality and nuclear safety to deteriorate in favor of keeping up the production of electricity. The entire licensing and regulatory process of the NRC was called into question by the problems at Browns Ferry.

           At Browns Ferry we have poor design, poor maintenance, poor training, lack of ethics, sacrificing safety to profits, poor oversight, advanced knowledge of serious problems, climate change related temperature increases interfering with cooling water supply and tornado damage. One reactor was shut down for over ten years. I question whether this plant should have been relicensed in 2006. It sounds like a major nuclear accident just waiting to happen.

  • U.S. Nuclear Reactors 15 – FitzPatrick, New York

              The James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant is located near Oswego, New York on the southeast shore of Lake Ontario. The plant contains one eight hundred and thirty eight megawatt General Electric boiling water reactor. The reactor was built by the Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation and put into operation in 1975 with a forty year license to 2014. Ownership passed to the Power Authority of the State of New York and eventually to Entergy. An extended license was issued in 2008 to operate until 2034.

              The population in the NRC plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of ten miles around the plant contains about thirty five thousand people. The NRC ingestion pathway zone with a radius of fifty miles around the plant contains about nine hundred thousand people. The NRC estimates that there is a very low risk of an earthquake that could damage the plant.

             In late 1991, the NRC sent a Diagnostic Inspection Team (DET) to the plant. On November 27th of 1991, the reactor was voluntarily shut down. The report of the inspection team was issued on December 3rd of 1991. The report detailed deficiencies in the plants programs for operation, maintenance, testing and engineering. Especially troubling was the finding that the isolation valves in the core spray system could not be relied upon to close properly and prevent the release of radioactive materials in the event of an accident. The operators of the plant agreed to plant upgrades and management changes to fix the problems revealed in the DET report. As the work proceeded additional problems were uncovered in the fire protection systems and the original design for the isolation valve system. Ultimately, the plant was closed over a year in order to make the necessary changes. The NRC issued a warning to other plants about the isolation valve problems that were uncovered at FitzPatrick.

             During the extended outage, the operators of the plant reported dozens of safety problems that had been known for years including deficiencies in the fire protection systems, the isolation valves already mentioned, failure to test equipment properly and flawed electrical installation. Of grave concern is the fact that the NRC had repeatedly inspected the FitzPatrick plant over the preceding years and yet had not identified many existing problems.

             In 1999, poor maintenance led to a hydrogen fire on the roof of the control building which forced a shutdown of the plant.

             Once again, a plant with a wide variety of problems continued to operate because the NRC failed in its oversight function for years. We have design flaws, fire suppression problems, electrical problems and failures to test equipment properly. Fortunately, in view of all the long-standing problems at FitzPatrick, there was not a serious accident that endangered the public.

  • U.S. Nuclear Reactors 14 – Donald C Cook, Michigan

              The Donald C. Cook Nuclear Generating Station is located eleven miles north of St. Joseph, Michigan on the southeast shore of Lake Michigan. The plant contains two 1000 megawatt Westinghouse four loop pressurized water nuclear reactors. The Unit 1 reactor was put into operation in 1974 and was licensed until 2014. The Unit 2 reactor was put into operation in 1977 and was licensed until 2017.  In 2005, both reactors were granted extended licenses, 2034 for Unit 1 and 2037 for Unit 2. The plant is owned by American Electric Power and operated by a subsidiary, Indiana Michigan Power.

              The population in the NRC plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of ten miles around the plant contains about fifty five thousand people. The NRC ingestion pathway zone with a radius of fifty miles around the plant contains about one million two hundred thousand people. The NRC estimates that there is a low risk of an earthquake that could damage the plant.

              In 1976, argon gas in a recirculation pit asphyxiated two workers. In 1979, one thousand gallons of radioactive coolant were sprayed over upper levels of the containment building. In 1990, the explosion of switchgear severely burned four people, killing one.

               In 1997, an NRC inspection questioned whether the plant was designed to be able to withstand a variety of possible accidents including earthquakes, explosions, fires, flood and tornados. The operators dealt with the specific problems that the NRC identified by early 1998 and preparations were made for a restart. The Union of Concerned Scientists pointed out that some identifiable problems at the plant had not been remedied, some of which concerned the ice condenser containment equipment. Problems of ice condensers had been identified at other nuclear reactor plants but the NRC took no actions on those warnings until the complaint of the UCS. Further inspection by the NRC confirmed that there were twenty nine violations of federal requirements at the plant. The plant operators proceeded to work on the identified problems and eventually reported back that over two hundred material conditions and seventy design problems had been fixed. Both Units were out of service for about three years while the work was done. In addition to the physical repairs and changes at the plant, there were changes in management.

              In 2003, a problem with a transformer triggered an automatic shutdown in Unit 1. Also in 2003, a huge number of fish entered the cooling intake and caused both units to be shut down for a day. In 2008, the main turbine and generator in Unit 1 was damaged by broken turbine blades. There was also a fire in the generator of Unit 1 that same year.

              The main problems at this plant stemmed from poor design at the plant and poor oversight on the part of the NRC. If the Union of Concerned Scientists had not intervened, the reactors at the plant would have been restarted while serious design problems were still present. In addition, we see that the behavior of fish in the lake providing cooling water forced the plant to shut down. Nuclear power is hyped as being a constant and reliable source of power in contrast to renewable energy such as wind and solar. Being shut down for three years for repairs is not my definition of reliable.

    Photo from David Wayne Prins:

  • U.S. Nuclear Reactors 13 – Calvert Cliffs, Maryland

              Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant is located on the western shore of Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. The plant contains two nine hundred megawatt Combustion Engineering  Generation II two-loop pressurized water reactors. Unit 1 was put into commercial operation in 1975 with a license to operate until 2014 and Unit 2 was put into operation in 1977 with a license to operate until 2016. Unit 1 was relicensed until 2034 in 2000 and Unit 2 was relicensed until 2036 in 2000. The plant is owned by Constellation Energy Nuclear Group (CENG) which is a joint venture between Exelon Corporation and Electricity of France (EDF), a French energy company.            

              The population in the NRC plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of ten miles around the plant contains about fifty thousand people. The NRC ingestion pathway zone with a radius of fifty miles around the plant contains almost three million people. The NRC estimates that there is a very low risk of an earthquake that could damage the reactors at the plant.

              In 1989, while Unit 1 was shut down for refueling, leaking pressurized heater sleeves had to be replaced which took over a year to accomplish. Unit 2 also had pressurized heater sleeve that leaked and it required over two years to fix those problems after a shut down for refueling in 1989. The NRC was tracking declining performance for months but was unable to force the needed changes until the problems became too serious to ignore.

              From 2000 on, operators knew that a roof was leaking whenever it rained but did nothing about the problem for years. Finally, in 2010 electrical equipment was shorted out by the water that came through the roof and one of the reactors shut down automatically. The second reactor automatically shut down because an inoperative protective device had not been replaced due to cost-cutting at the plant.

               In 2007, UniStar Nuclear Energy, a company jointly owned by CENG and EDF, launched a proposal to build a third reactor at Calvert Cliffs  and the plan began working its way through the licensing process. In 2009, an opponent of the plan to build the new reactor asked the NRC to deny an emissions permit needed for the third reactor. In 2010, CENG sold its stake in the UniStar Nuclear Energy to EDF. In 2011, the NRC said that UniStar could not own a reactor in the United States because it was not a U.S. company.

              Calvert Cliffs is another example of poor design/improper construction that required reactors to be shut down for years to remedy. It is also another example of the regulatory impotence of the NRC which saw problems but could not get them fixed until they became serious. The operators knew about a leaking roof for years but did nothing until the leak shut down the reactors. Calvert Cliffs is also the first plant that we have discussed where inoperative safety equipment was not replaced because the operators wanted to save money. Given the history of the operators of this plant, it is probably just as well that the plan to build a third reactor failed.

    Photo from Jbs666: