The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for October 18, 2023

    Geiger Readings for October 18, 2023

    Ambient office = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 95 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 96 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 145 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 126 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 835 – U.S. National Laboratories Are Building A Machine Called Scorpius To Help Improve Computer Models Of Nuclear Materials – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Weapons 835 – U.S. National Laboratories Are Building A Machine Called Scorpius To Help Improve Computer Models Of Nuclear Materials – Part 2 of 2 Parts

    Part 2 of 2 Parts (Please read Part 1 first)
         One of the major questions that will be answered by Scorpius is how effective the plutonium in the U.S. nuclear stockpile may prove to be, given its age.
          Custer said, “The newest systems we have first went into the stockpile in the 1980s. If you bought a car in 1992 and parked it in your garage, doing nothing to it, do you think it would start tomorrow on the first turn of the key? Not a perfect analogy, but you could do experiments and simulate things all you want, but you still want to turn the key and hear the engine turn over every once in a while, to know it will start when you need it.”
         Custer goes on to say that we know that plutonium does undergo spontaneous fission. “This means that the material we first made and shaped precisely decades ago now has impurities from the fission in it, and the crystal structure has been damaged by the energetic decays. If you look at steel, very small changes to composition can make large changes to, for example, the mechanical strength. The X-ray images from Scorpius will help validate that at full scale, the plutonium still behaves as needed in spite of such changes.”
         Scorpius is designed to generate high-energy pulses of electrons. It slams the electrons into a heavy metal target to create bright X-ray flashes that will capture pictures of the plutonium.
         Custer said, “There are very good models of what happens inside a nuclear weapon. We will now be able to take detailed X-ray images of what happens as the device implodes to see if the models are right. If the models are not right, we will make them right. We can’t afford to be wrong.”
         A key part of the Scorpius design is the manner in which it can generate huge pulses of electrical energy. Instead of relying on giant banks of capacitors for this task, it will use more than forty thousand commercial printed circuit boards to create four twenty-five-thousand volt pulses. These will energize a twenty-two million electron-volt electron beam.
         Custer said, “The flexibility and programmability of the units makes it much easier to create precisely the X-ray bursts that the experimenters want for their particular experiment. Taking advantage of commercially available chips and standard electronics assembly similar to, for example, a desktop computer board, is just a good engineering choice. It also is likely that as commercial parts get more capable—higher voltages, higher currents—there are upgrade paths in the future for even higher performance of the machine if wanted.”
         With the release this year of Christopher Nolan’s movie “Oppenheimer,” the public’s attention has turned once again to nuclear weapons. Custer said, “One of the scenes in the movie was several scientists betting whether the Trinity test would ignite the atmosphere, which was disturbing—an understatement—to General Groves. There was uncertainty there, although the possibility was swiftly debunked in real life. Scorpius aims to eliminate any uncertainty.”

  • Geiger Readings for October 17, 2023

    Geiger Readings for October 17, 2023

    Ambient office = 92 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 112 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 115 nanosieverts per hour

    Strawberry tomato from Central Market = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 97 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 86 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Weapons 834 – U.S. National Laboratories Are Building A Machine Called Scorpius To Help Improve Computer Models Of Nuclear Materials – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Nuclear Weapons 834 – U.S. National Laboratories Are Building A Machine Called Scorpius To Help Improve Computer Models Of Nuclear Materials – Part 1 of 2 Parts

    Part 1 of 2 Parts
         Below the Nevada desert, a machine called Scorpius is being constructed that will utilize high explosives to crush plutonium to states that exist just before a nuclear explosion. The goal of the U.S. two-billion-dollar project is to scan this plutonium with X-rays to help check the accuracy of supercomputer models designed to predict whether the U.S. aging nuclear arsenal will work.
         In the first fifty years of the U.S. nuclear weapons program, scientists tested whether the nuclear bombs worked by actually detonating them. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush signed into law a moratorium on nuclear tests.
         Currently, supercomputer models are used to predict whether U.S. nuclear weapons might work. However, the accuracy of the models remains uncertain. Scientists do use data from actual explosives for these models. However, these surrogate materials possess significant differences from the plutonium typically used to make nuclear weapons. This raises the question of exactly how well these models simulate real nuclear explosions.
         Jon Custer is a technical manager at Sandia National Laboratories in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He said, “Plutonium is a strange element, displaying six different crystal structures between room temperature and melting, at normal pressure, and a seventh phase at slightly elevated pressure. Three of these crystal structures are unique to plutonium. This means that there is no surrogate material that will truly mimic plutonium behavior.”
        Nuclear bombs use high explosives to force weapons-grade plutonium or uranium-235 to implode. This triggers a catastrophic nuclear chain reaction. Scorpius is designed to create nanosecond-long X-ray images of plutonium as it compresses the plutonium or uranium with high explosives. Scorpius took its name from Scorpius X-1 which is the brightest extrasolar X-ray source. The name also reflects its subterranean location where desert scorpions burrow underground.
         The goal of Scorpius is to help give supercomputer models the accurate data that they require to ascertain whether they are generating realistic simulation of nuclear-weapon behavior. The device is expected to be operational by late 2027. It is under construction a thousand feet beneath the Nevada National Security Site which is a test area bigger than the state of Rhode Island.
         Jon Custer is the lead scientist for Scandia’s part of Scorpius. He said, “We will understand the performance and reliability of the nuclear stockpile, a critical part of our national security.” Scorpius is a joint project of the Sandia, Los Alamos, and Lawrence Livermore national laboratories, as well as the Nevada National Security Site.)
         Scorpius is specifically designed to “tickle the dragon’s tail” according to Custer. The explosives are designed to bring plutonium to a highly compressed, hot state, but not beyond the critical point at which it would explode.
         Custer said, “The conditions in an implosion, even before nuclear yield, are unfathomable to humans. Well before the device would go critical, the temperature inside is well above the surface of the sun, and the pressure is approaching that of the core of the sun. So while we think the models we use are really, really good across such huge changes, we need to test just how good they are. Scorpius allows us to image the real thing. While Scorpius will image late-time behavior, the subcritical experiments are not physically able to assemble into a critical configuration.” Custer also said that there is a long history of experiments bringing plutonium to “subcritical” conditions.
    Please read Part 2 next

  • Geiger Readings for October 16, 2023

    Geiger Readings for October 16, 2023

    Ambient office = 76 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 80 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Mini cucumber from Central Market = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 84 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for October 15, 2023

    Geiger Readings for October 15, 2023

    Ambient office = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 113 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 111 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberryy from Central Market = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 74 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 62 nanosieverts per hour