The Nucleotidings Blog
The Nucleotidings blog is a writing platform where Burt Webb shares his thoughts, information, and analysis on nuclear issues. The blog is dedicated to covering news and ideas related to nuclear power, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection. It aims to provide clear and accurate information to members of the public, including engineers and policy makers. Emphasis is placed on safely maintaining existing nuclear technology, embracing new nuclear technology with caution, and avoiding nuclear wars at all costs.

Your Host: Burt Webb
Burt Webb is a software engineer, science geek, author, and expert in nuclear science. Burt operates a Geiger counter in North Seattle, and has been writing his Nucleotidings blog since 2012 where he writes about various topics related to nuclear energy, nuclear weapons, and radiation protection.

Burt Webb has published several technical books and novels. He works as a software consultant.

Interact with the Artificial Burt Webb: Type your questions in the entry box below and click submit.

Example Q&A with the Artificial Burt Webb

Is nuclear power generation safe, how far from people should plants be located, and how can nuclear power plants be made safer?

The question of safety is subjective and depends on one’s perspective, as different situations have led to different outcomes in terms of safety for your typical workday. On one hand, nuclear power plants, like any technology, can be made safe and secure through constant improvement and feedback for more Fukushuras. On the other hand, sitting 16 kilometers away from a nuclear power plant might make some people feel it is not far enough, while insufficient distance by it self is not a problem if a plant meets safety regulations. Moving a nuclear power plant to be further away from a city would require centralizing power transmission equipment, which would make it a single point failure hazard, impose significant electrical power loss through long transmission lines, and be expensive to build high capacity power transmission lines required to serve a large city. Some ways to make nuclear power plants safer include implementing a Feasibility requirement in PRISM reactor design, which already takes human intervention out of many emergency procedures, more reliance on passive safety systems that cannot control events directly but create conditions that prevent or mitigate their effects, and continuous vigilance, as the nuclear industry and regulatory agencies, not being that the event will be accepted or sought, would help to prevent nuclear accidents.

What do you mean by “Fukushuras”?

“Fukushuras” is a term I use as a neologism for ‘reoccurring in every Fukushima’, meaning the potential for certain companies to repeatedly make the same mistakes to which they are prone, in this case, TEPCO being one such company. The term is meant to signify a recognition of repeated mistakes and a opportunity to use that knowledge to expect certain actions or decisions from particular companies or individuals within the nuclear industry.

Blog

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 27, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 27, 2023

    Ambient office = 100 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 105 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 108 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 94 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 98 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 71 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 26, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 26, 2023

    Ambient office = 85 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 128 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 124 nanosieverts per hour

    Blueberry from Central Market = 125 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 104 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 91 nanosieverts per hour

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 25, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 25, 2023

    Ambient office = 81 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 133 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 129 nanosieverts per hour

    Tomato from Central Market = 65 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 87 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 66 nanosieverts per hour

    Dover Sole from Central = 98 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Reactors 1195 – The Tennessee Valley Authority Is Collaborating With Three Other Companies To Build Small Modular Reactors At The Clinch River Site

    Nuclear Reactors 1195 – The Tennessee Valley Authority Is Collaborating With Three Other Companies To Build Small Modular Reactors At The Clinch River Site

         The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally owned electric utility corporation in the United States. TVA’s service area covers all of Tennessee, portions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, and small areas of Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. The utility is finalizing plans for the next generation of commercial nuclear power plants with the announcement this week that it will construct a cutting-edge reactor near Oak Ridge, Tennessee in partnership with three other companies which include the joint American-Japanese GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, Ontario Power Generation in Canada and Synthos Green Energy in Poland.
         The federal utility has signed an agreement with the companies to collaborate on the design for a new small modular reactor (SMR) that will be far smaller than the existing plants known for their massive cooling towers. The new reactor will be less expensive and easier to build.
         The TVA and its collaborators will spend about four hundred million dollars on the project. The board of the TVA has already authorized two hundred million dollars for the program. This will cover the TVA’s portion.
         The Clinch River site is located in Kingston, Tennessee near the Oak Ridge Turnpike. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee visited the site on March 3rd. Jeff Lyash is the CEO of the TVA. He accompanied the governor’s visit to the site. Lyash said that the location was perfect because it is near Oak Ridge’s longstanding nuclear sites. It is on a bend in the Clinch River where the cold water can be used for cooling the reactor.
         The TVA owns the land because it was part o a previous project in the 1970s. Using the site for SMRs means a return on the TVA’s investment decades later.
         SMRs are designed to be much safer than current large reactor operating around the U.S. However, it is a new technology so there is no safety record yet. The design for SMRs and the construction process will be regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). The NRC oversees the civilian use of radioactive materials.
         The emergency planning zone surrounding the TVA’s current nuclear reactors is ten miles in every direction. These zones are established by the NRC to reduce or prevent radiation exposure in an emergency for those who live near operating nuclear power plants. The SMR emergency zone will not extend beyond the boundary of the plant property.
        Joe Shea is the TVA’s senior technical advisor for the project. He said that the Clinch River site could host at least four SMRs. Lyash mentioned that if the TVA is successful in building a single unit it would be then build three more. The federal utility could also install small reactors at other sites.
         One SMR is about the size of a football field according to Shea. The SMR will include a reactor building, a turbine building and a control room. This information comes from a TVA rendering of the design.
          Shea added that it will be the early 2030s at best before the SMR is generating electricity.

  • Geiger Readings for Mar 24, 2023

    Geiger Readings for Mar 24, 2023

    Ambient office = 73 nanosieverts per hour

    Ambient outside = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    Soil exposed to rain water = 102 nanosieverts per hour

    English cucumber from Central Market = 76 nanosieverts per hour

    Tap water = 93 nanosieverts per hour

    Filter water = 74 nanosieverts per hour

  • Nuclear Fusion 115 – Kyoto Fusioneering Is Collaborating With Other Fusion Researchers To Develop Materials For Fusion Reactors

    Nuclear Fusion 115 – Kyoto Fusioneering Is Collaborating With Other Fusion Researchers To Develop Materials For Fusion Reactors

         Japan’s Kyoto Fusioneering (KF) and the U.K. Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) have just signed a collaboration agreement to develop fusion related technologies. The first project of the collaboration will be to develop a ‘fusion-grade’ silicon carbide composition system.
         The partners said, “The collaboration reaffirms the strategic partnership between the United Kingdom and Japan and is based on a mutual commitment to deliver sustainable, commercial fusion energy for generations to come.”
         KF and UKAEA stated that as a first step, they will develop a silicon carbide composition system (SiC/SiC) that will be suitable for use as a structural material inside a fusion reactor. They will test its stability under simulated fusion conditions.
         The use of SiC/SiC composites within the breeder blanket of a fusion reactor will increase the efficiency and commercial viability commercial nuclear fusion power plants. The new material will be able to operate at high temperatures and is resistant to neutron damage.
         The Self-Cooled Yuryo Lithium Lead Advanced (SCYLLA) blanket developed by KF is compatible with the lithium-lead based coolant and fuel breeding fluids in some fusion reactors.
         Testing of irradiated composites can only be carried out in a suitable active testing facility. KF is expecting to reach out to UKAEA’s Materials Research Facility for support.
          New post-irradiation examination methods are being developed by UKAEA to allow them to understand the changes in microstructural properties of the SiC/SiC samples caused by radiation damage. Some novel methods need to be used to extract useful material properties.
          Under the new collaboration, KF will accelerate the development of critical components catered to the needs of other fusion research institutions around the world.]
         KF has already signed several contracts awarded by UKAEA to provide its expertise and services. One of the most notable KF contracts involves being appointed in August 2022 as a member of the Spherical Tokamak for Energy Production (STEP) Interim Engineering Deliver Partner consortium. KF was also selected as a Tier 1 supplier in 2021 in the UKAEA Tritium Engineering Framework for the STEP fuel cycle.
         Taka Nagao is the CEO of Kyoto Fusioneering. He said, “The several contracts we have with UKAEA have demonstrated the win-win relationship that can create new value for the society and fusion research and fusion industry. Kyoto Fusioneering will continue to build on our successful technology collaboration to help achieve industrialization of fusion energy. The development of a ‘fusion-grade’ silicon carbide composite system is not only a huge advancement to the realization of commercial fusion, but also yet another advantage of the blanket system, which is so important in our collective battle against climate change.”
         Ian Chapman is the CEO of UKAEA. He said, “This collaboration agreement builds on our existing relationship. Putting fusion electricity on the grid requires finding and integrating solutions to several major challenges and we will be working with Kyoto Fusioneering on finding solutions to some of those challenges.”
         UKAEA has signed several agreements over the past few months to collaborate on the development of fusion technologies with other researchers. These contracts include a strategic research partnership with the US Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory aimed at achieving a better understanding of the performance and behavior of materials required for use in future commercial nuclear fusion power plants. UKAEA has also signed a five-year framework agreement with Tokamak Energy for closer collaboration “on developing spherical tokamaks as a route to commercial fusion energy”. It also signed an agreement with the University of Sheffield and the University of Birmingham to collaborate on fusion R&D.